Politics and qualitative nursing research

Routledge International Handbook of Qualitative Nursing Research

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 371-379

  Johnson, Joy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942244574     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203409527     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Baylis, F. (2012). Knowledge: The best return on investment. The Mark. First posted March 20, 2012. http://www.themarknews.com/articles/8299-knowledge-the-best-return-on-investment
2. Benner, M., & Sandström, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29, 291-301
3. Buxton, M., & Hanney, S. (1996). How can payback from health services research be assessed? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1, 35-43
4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (2012). CIHR guide to knowledge translation. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
5. Carey, M. A. (1997). Qualitative research in policy development. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project: Details and dialogue (pp. 345-355). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
6. Chubin, D. E., & Hackett, E. J. (1990). Peer review and U.S. Science policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press
7. Cohen, D. J., & Crabtree B. F. (2008). Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: Controversies and recommendations. Annals of Family Medicine, 6, 331-339. doi: 10.1370/afm.818
8. Dey, P., & Nentwich, J. (2006). The identity politics of qualitative research: A discourse analytic inter-text. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 28. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/ index.php/fqs/article/view/173/387
9. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum
10. Government of Canada. (2007). Mobilizing science and technology to Canada's advantage. Ottawa: Publishing and Depository Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada
11. Habermas. J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1, Reason and rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon
12. Lavis, J. N., Wilson, M. G., Oxman, A., Lewin, S., & Fretheim, A. (2009). SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 4: Using research evidence to clarify a problem. Health Research and Policy Systems, 7(Suppl. 1): S4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S4
13. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
14. Martin, B. (1998). Information liberation. London: Freedom Press
15. Mukherjee, S. (2010). The emperor of all maladies: A biography of cancer. New York: Scribner
16. Panel on Return on Investment in Health Research (2009). Making an impact: A preferred framework and indicators to measure returns on investment in health research. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences
17. Peters, D. (2012). Research rising. University Affairs, 53(1), 18-23
18. Rist, R. C. (1994) Influencing the policy process with qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545-559). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
19. Slow Science Academy (2010). The slow science manifesto. Retrieved from http://slow-science.org/
20. Smit, B. (2003). Can qualitative research inform policy implementation? Evidence and arguments form a developing country. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), Art. 6
21. Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journal. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 178-182. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
22. Thorngate, W., Faregh, N., & Young, M. (2002). Mining the archives: Analyses of CIHR research grant adjudications. Ottawa, ON: Psychology Department, Carleton University
23. Udry, J. R. (1993). The politics of sex research. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 103-110
24. Wooding, S., Hanney, S., Buxton, M., & Grant, J. (2005). Payback arising from research funding: Evaluation of the Arthritis Research Campaign, Rheumatology, 44, 1145-1156. First published online July 27, 2005