Crookedness of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) growing under a canopy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 688-698

  Skrzyszewski, Jerzy ^a   Pach, Maciej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

Author keywords

height increment; stand conversion; stem curvature; understorey

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; RESEARCH;

BROAD-LEAVED FORESTS; COMPETITIVE PRESSURE; DIAMETER-AT-BREAST HEIGHTS; ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE; HEIGHT INCREMENTS; NATURAL REGENERATION; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; UNDERSTOREY;

REFORESTATION;

EID: 84942198326     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2015.1048713     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. T.Alméras, A.Thibaut, J.Gril 2005. Effect of circumferential heterogeneity of wood maturation strain, modulus of elasticity and radial growth on the regulation of stem orientation in trees. Trees. 19:457–467.
2. A.Bolte, C.Ammer, M.Löf, P.Madsen, G.J.Nabuurs, P.Schall, P.Spathelf, J.Rock 2009. Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scand J Forest Res. 24:473–482.
3. A.Bravo-Oviedo, H.Pretzsch, C.Ammer, E.Andenmatten, A.Barbati, S.Barreiro, P.Brang, F.Bravo, L.Coll, P.Corona,. 2014. European mixed forests: definition and research perspectives. Forest Syst. 23:518–533.
4. C.L.Brown 1971. Secondary growth. In: M.H.Zimmerman, C.L.Brown, editors. Trees: structure and function. New York: Springer-Verlag; p. 94–157.
5. I.Frost, H.Rydin 2000. Spatial pattern and size distribution of the animal-dispersed tree Quercus robur in two spruce-dominated forests. Ecoscience. 7:38–44.
6. S.Getzin, K.Wiegand 2007. Asymmetric tree growth at the stand level: random crown patterns and the response to slope. For Ecol Manag. 242:165–174.
7. R.Goris, V.Kint, K.Haneca, G.Geudens, H.Beeckman, K.Verheyen 2007. Long-term dynamics in a planted conifer forest with spontaneous ingrowth of broad-leaved trees. Appl Veg Sci. 10:219–228.
8. J.Hansen 2004. Conversion of coniferous forests – will ecological and economic needs meet? EFI News. 12:3–6.
9. F.Hegyi. 1974. A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: G.Fries, editor. Growth models for tree and stand simulation, Research Note 30. Stockholm: Royal College of Forestry; p. 74–90.
10. J.S.Jensen 2000. Provenance variation in phenotypic traits in Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Danish Provenance Trials. Scand J For Res. 15:297–308.
11. J.S.Jensen, H.Wellendorf, K.Jager, S.M.G.De Vries, V.Jensen 1997. Analysis of a 17-year old dutch open-pollinated progeny trial with Quercus robur (L.). Forest Genet. 4:139–147.
12. G.Kenk, S.Guehne 2001. Management of transformation in central Europe. For Ecol Manag. 151:107–119.
13. V.Kint 2005. Structural development in ageing temperate Scots pine stands. For Ecol Manag. 214:237–250.
14. V.Kint, P.Lasch, M.Lindner, B.Muys 2009. Multipurpose conversion management of Scots pine towards mixed oak–birch stands – a long-term simulation approach. For Ecol Manag. 257:199–214.
15. V.Kint, G.M.J.Mohren, G.Geudens, R.De Wulf, N.Lust 2004. Pathways of stand development in ageing Pinus sylvestris forests. J Veg Sci. 15:549–560.
16. T.Knoke, C.AmmerCh, B.Stimm, R.Mosandl 2008. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J For Res. 127:89–101.
17. J.Krahl-Urban 1959. Die Eichen [The Oaks]. Hamburg: Paul Parey.
18. A.Kremer, J.L.Dupouey, J.D.Deans, J.Cottrell, U.Csaikl, R.Finkeldey, S.Espinel, J.Jensen, J.Kleinschmit, B.Van Dam, 2002. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann For Sci. 59:777–787.
19. J.Matsuzaki, M.Masumori, T.Tange 2006. Stem phototropism of trees: a possible significant factor in determining stem inclination on forest slopes. Ann Bot. 98:573–581.
20. J.Matsuzaki, M.Masumori, T.Tange 2007. Phototropic bending of non-elongating and radially growing woody stems results from asymmetrical xylem formation. Plant Cell Environ. 30:646–653.
21. F.Mirschel, S.Zerbe, F.Jansen 2011. Driving factors for natural tree rejuvenation in anthropogenic pine Pinus sylvestris L. forests of NE Germany. For Ecol Manag. 261:683–694.
22. R.Mosandl, A.Kleinert 1998. Development of oaks Quercus petraea Matt./Liebl. emerged from bird-dispersed seeds under old-growth pine Pinus silvestris L. stands. For Ecol Manag. 106:35–44.
23. R.Mosandl, R.Küssner 1999. Conversion of pure pine and spruce forests into mixed forests in eastern Germany: some aspects of silvicultural strategy. In: A.F.M.Olsthoorn, H.H.Bartelink, J.J.Gardiner, H.Pretzsch, H.J.Hekhuis, A.Franc, editors. Management of mixed-species forest: silviculture and economics. IBN Sci. Contrib. 15; Wageningen (The Netherlands); p. 208–218.
24. J.Nagel 1992. Program Stanly 2.0. In: B.Sloboda, editor. Modelle zu automatisierten Zuwachsmeß- und Auswerttechniken, klimaorientierte Wachstumsmodelle, Inventurmethoden und ihre Anwendungen [Models for the automated techniques of increment determination and evaluation, climate-oriented growth models, forest inventory methods and their applications]. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt. Frankfurt: J.D. Sauerländer's Verlag; p. 32–38.
25. A.J.Newbold, F.B.Goldsmith 1981. The regeneration of oak and beech: a literature review. Discussion papers in conservation, 33. University College, London.
26. M.Noack 2011. Growth and nutrition of Quercus petraea underplanted in artificial pine stands under conversion in the northeastern German Lowlands. Forest Sys. 203:423–436.
27. R.Paluch 2005. Odnowienie naturalne dębu w Leśnym Kompleksie Promocyjnym „Puszcza Białowieska” – stan, warunki i perspektywy [Natural regeneration of oak in the “Białowieża Primeval Forest” promotional forest complex – state, conditions and prospects]. Sylwan. 1:30–41. (In Polish).
28. R.Paluch 2007. Możliwość i celowość wykorzystania ekspansji dębu w drzewostanach sosnowych do realizacji celów hodowlanych [The possibility and desirability of expanding the use of oak in pine stands to achieve silvicultural objectives]. In: P.Rutkowski, editor. Hodowla dębów w Polsce. Wybrane zagadnienia [Oak silviculture in Poland. Selected issues]. Idee Ekologiczne; Poznań 16:83–90. (In Polish).
29. A.M.Petriţan, B.von Lüpke, I.C.Petriţan 2009. Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech Fagus sylvatica L., maple Acer pseudoplatanus L. and ash Fraxinus excelsior L. saplings. Eur J For Res. 128:61–74.
30. I.Pigan, M.Pigan 1999. Naturalne odnowienie dębu w drzewostanach sosnowych [Natural regeneration of pedunculate oak in pine]. Sylwan. 9:23–29. (In Polish)
31. A.Reif, U.Brucker, R.Kratzer, A.Schmiedinger, J.Bauhus 2010. Forest management in times of climate change – synergies and potential conflicts between forestry and nature conservation. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung. 42:261–266.
32. A.Robards 1966. The application of the modified sine rule to tension wood production and eccentric growth on the stem of Crack Willow Salix fragilis L. Ann Bot. 30:513–523.
33. E.Röhrig, N.Bartsch, B.von Lüpke 2006. Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage [Silviculture on ecological basis]. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer.
34. E.Sinnot 1952. Reaction wood and the regulation of tree form. Am J Bot. 39:69–78.
35. J.Skrzyszewski, K.Skrzyszewska 2004. Species conversion of spruce stands in the Wisła Forest District. Dendrobiology. 51(Suppl.):95–99.
36. H.Spiecker, J.Hansen, E.Klimo, J.P.Skovsgaard, H.Sterba, K.von Teuffel, editors. 2004. Norway Spruce Conversion – options and consequences. European Forest Institute Research Report 18. Leiden: Brill.
37. P.T.Stancioiu, K.L.O’Hara 2006. Morphological plasticity of regeneration subject to different levels of canopy cover in mixed-species, multiaged forests of the Romanian Carpathians. Trees. 20:196–209.
38. StatSoft, Inc. 2010. STATISTICA data analysis software system. Version 9.1. www.statsoft.com
39. T.Trampler, A.Kliczkowska, E.Dmyterko 1994. A system of natural-forest regionalization of Poland as based on ecological and physiographical principles. Fol For Pol Series A – Forestry. 36:63–77.
40. A.F.M.Van Hees 1997. Growth and morphology of pedunculate oak Quercus robur L. and beech Fagus sylvatica L. seedlings in relation to shading and drought. Ann For Sci. 54:9–18.
41. K.Verheyen, N.Lust, M.Carnol, L.Hens, J.J.Bouma 2006. Feasibility of forest conversion: ecological, social and economic aspects FEFOCON. Scientific support plan for a sustainable development policy. Report for Belgian Science Policy. Brussels.
42. A.B.Wardrop 1964. Reaction anatomy of arborescent angiosperms. In: M.H.Zimmermann, editor. Formation of wood in forest trees. New York: Academic Press; p. 405–456.
43. A.Węgiel, R.Jaszczak, G.Rączka, P.Strzeliński, D.Sugiero, A.Wierzbicka 2009. An economic aspect of conversion of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. stands in the Polish Lowland. J For Sci. 55:293–298.
44. B.F.Wilson, R.R.Archer 1979. Tree design: some biological solutions to mechanical problems. Bioscience. 29:293–298.
45. A.Woś 1999. Klimat polski [climate of Poland]. Warszawa: PWN. (In Polish).
46. S.Zerbe 2002. Restoration of natural broad-leaved woodland in Central Europe on sites with coniferous forest plantations. For Ecol Manag. 167:27–42