Linking the Cell Cycle to Cell Fate Decisions

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 592-600

  Dalton, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Cell fate; Pluripotency; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL KINETICS; CELL POPULATION; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; CELL DIVISION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS;

CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; G1 PHASE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMANS; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

EID: 84942117693     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.007     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Sela Y., et al. Human embryonic stem cells exhibit increased propensity to differentiate during the G1 phase prior to phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. Stem Cells 2012, 30:1097-1108.
2. Pauklin S., Vallier L. The cell-cycle state of stem cells determines cell fate propensity. Cell 2013, 155:135-147.
3. Dalton S. G1 compartmentalization and cell fate coordination. Cell 2013, 155:13-14.
4. Blagosklonny M.V., Pardee A.B. The restriction point of the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2002, 1:103-110.
5. Sherr C.J. D-type cyclins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1995, 20:187-190.
6. Connolly B., et al. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1988, 8:2342-2349.
7. Wu J.R., Gilbert D.M. The replication origin decision point is a mitogen-independent, 2-aminopurine-sensitive, G1-phase event that precedes restriction point control. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17:4312-4321.
8. Ferrezuelo F., et al. The critical size is set at a single-cell level by growth rate to attain homeostasis and adaptation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:1012.
9. Egli D., et al. Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:505-516.
10. Walter J., et al. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:685-697.
11. Reddy K.L., et al. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008, 452:243-247.
12. Tumbar T., Belmont A.S. Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:134-139.
13. Thomson I., et al. The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:166-172.
14. Dekker J. Two ways to fold the genome during the cell cycle: insights obtained with chromosome conformation capture. Epigenetics Chromatin 2014, 7:25.
15. Singh A.M., et al. Cell-cycle control of developmentally regulated transcription factors accounts for heterogeneity in human pluripotent cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2013, 5:532-544.
16. Snow M.H.L. Gastrulation in the mouse: Growth and regionalization of the epiblast. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 1977, 42:293-303.
17. Hogan B., et al. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo 1994, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 2nd edn.
18. Murray A.W., Kirschner M.W. Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle. Nature 1989, 339:275-280.
19. Lawson K.A., et al. Clonal analysis of epiblast fate during germ layer formation in the mouse embryo. Development 1991, 113:891-911.
20. Edgar B.A., Lehner C.F. Developmental control of cell cycle regulators: a fly's perspective. Science 1996, 274:1646-1652.
21. Yarden A., Geiger B. Zebrafish cyclin E regulation during early embryogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 1996, 206:1-11.
22. Stead E., et al. Pluripotent cell division cycles are driven by ectopic Cdk2, cyclin A/E and E2F activities. Oncogene 2002, 221:8320-8333.
23. Collart C., et al. Titration of four replication factors is essential for the Xenopus laevis midblastula transition. Science 2013, 341:893-896.
24. Li V.C., et al. Gap 1 phase length and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:12550-12555.
25. Singh A.M., Dalton S. The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:141-149.
26. Mummery C.L., et al. Cell cycle analysis during retinoic acid induced differentiation of a human embryonal carcinoma-derived cell line. Cell Differ. 1987, 20:153-160.
27. Coronado D., et al. A short G1 phase is an intrinsic determinant of naïve embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cell Res. 2013, 10:118-131.
28. Chetty S., et al. A simple tool to improve pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:553-556.
29. Savatier P., et al. Contrasting patterns of retinoblastoma protein expression in mouse embryonic stem cells and embryonic fibroblasts. Oncogene 1994, 9:809-818.
30. White J., et al. Developmental activation of the Rb-E2F pathway and establishment of cell cycle-regulated cyclin-dependent kinase activity during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005, 16:2018-2027.
31. Faast R., et al. Cdk6-cyclin D3 activity in murine ES cells is resistant to inhibition by p16(INK4a). Oncogene 2004, 23:491-502.
32. Brons I.G., et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007, 448:191-195.
33. Tesar P.J., et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:196-199.
34. Nichols J., Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4:487-492.
35. Neganova I., et al. Expression and functional analysis of G1 to S regulatory components reveals an important role for CDK2 in cell cycle regulation in human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 2009, 28:20-30.
36. Bernstein B.E., et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006, 125:315-326.
37. Takahashi T., et al. The cell cycle of the pseudostratified ventricular epithelium of the embryonic murine cerebral wall. J. Neurosci. 1995, 15:6046-6057.
38. Lange C., et al. Cdk4/cyclinD1 overexpression in neural stem cells shortens G1, delays neurogenesis, and promotes the generation and expansion of basal progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:320-331.
39. Salomoni P., Calegari F. Cell cycle control of mammalian neural stem cells: putting a speed limit on G1. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:233-243.
40. Arai Y., et al. Neural stem and progenitor cells shorten S-phase on commitment to neuron production. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2:154.
41. Britz O., et al. A role for proneural genes in the maturation of cortical progenitor cells. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16(Suppl. 1):i138-i151.
42. Ali F., et al. Cell cycle-regulated multi-site phosphorylation of Neurogenin 2 coordinates cell cycling with differentiation during neurogenesis. Development 2011, 138:4267-4277.
43. Orford K.W., Scadden D.T. Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9:115-128.
44. Laurenti E., et al. CDK6 levels regulate quiescence exit in human hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16:302-313.
45. Kim Y.H., et al. Cell cycle-dependent differentiation dynamics balances growth and endocrine differentiation in the pancreas. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13:e1002111.
46. Ma Y., et al. How the cell cycle impacts chromatin architecture and influences cell fate. Front. Genet. 2015, 6:19.