Preoperative biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Identifying patients who require percutaneous drainage after failed endoscopic drainage

Endoscopy

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1124-1131

  Wiggers, Jimme K ^a   Koerkamp, Bas Groot ^b,c   Coelen, Robert J ^a   Rauws, Erik A ^a   Schattner, Mark A ^b   Nio, C Yung ^a   Brown, Karen T ^b   Gonen, Mithat ^b   Van Dieren, Susan ^a   Van Lienden, Krijn P ^a   Allen, Peter J ^b   Besselink, Marc G H ^a   Busch, Olivier R C ^a   D'Angelica, Michael I ^b   Dematteo, Robert P ^b   Gouma, Dirk J ^a   Kingham, T Peter ^b   Jarnagin, William R ^b   Van Gulik, Thomas M ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILIRUBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILIARY STENT; BILIARY TRACT DRAINAGE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLESTASIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAUNDICE; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; PERIHILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; DRAINAGE; KLATSKIN TUMOR; NETHERLANDS; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

AGED; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILIARY TRACT SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLESTASIS; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KLATSKIN TUMOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84942066890     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392559     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Valle J., Wasan H., Palmer D. H. et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. NEJM: 2010; 362 1273 1281
2. Ebata T., Kosuge T., Hirano S. et al. Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. Br J Surg: 2014; 101 79 88
3. Matsuo K., Rocha F. G., Ito K. et al. The Blumgart preoperative staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of resectability and outcomes in 380 patients. J Am Coll Surg: 2012; 215 343 355
4. Nuzzo G., Giuliante F., Ardito F. et al. Improvement in perioperative and long-term outcome after surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: results of an Italian multicenter analysis of 440 patients. Arch Surg: 2012; 147 26 34
5. Nagino M., Ebata T., Yokoyama Y. et al. Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg: 2013; 258 129 140
6. Kennedy T. J., Yopp A., Qin Y. et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage of liver remnant prior to extended liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford): 2009; 11 445 451
7. Farges O., Regimbeau J. M., Fuks D. et al. Multicentre European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg: 2013; 100 274 283
8. Neuhaus P., Thelen A., Jonas S. et al. Oncological superiority of hilar en bloc resection for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol: 2012; 19 1602 1608
9. Kaiser G. M., Paul A., Sgourakis G. et al. Novel prognostic scoring system after surgery for Klatskin tumor. Am Surg: 2013; 79 90 95
10. Nagino M., Kamiya J., Uesaka K. et al. Complications of hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg: 2001; 25 1277 1283
11. Sakata J., Shirai Y., Tsuchiya Y. et al. Preoperative cholangitis independently increases in-hospital mortality after combined major hepatic and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg: 2009; 394 1065 1072
12. Iacono C., Ruzzenente A., Campagnaro T. et al. Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks. Ann Surg: 2013; 257 191 204
13. Kloek J. J., van der Gaag N. A., Aziz Y. et al. Endoscopic and percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg: 2010; 14 119 125
14. Kawakami H., Kuwatani M., Onodera M. et al. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol: 2011; 46 242 248
15. Khan S. A., Davidson B. R., Goldin R. D. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut: 2012; 61 1657 1669
16. Dumonceau J-M, Tringali A., Blero D. et al. Biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 277 298
17. van Gulik T. M., Kloek J. J., Ruys A. T. et al. Multidisciplinary management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor): extended resection is associated with improved survival. Eur J Surg Oncol: 2011; 37 65 71
18. Charlson M. E., Pompei P., Ales K. L. et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis: 1987; 40 373 383
19. Bismuth H., Corlette M. B. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet: 1975; 140 170 178
20. Bismuth H., Nakache R., Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg: 1992; 215 31 38
21. Vergouwe Y., Royston P., Moons K. GM et al. Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach. J Clin Epidemiol: 2010; 63 205 214
22. Rubin D. B. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York Wiley: 1987
23. Budczies J., Klauschen F., Sinn B. V. et al. Cutoff Finder: a comprehensive and straightforward Web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS One: 2012; 7 e51862
24. Cover T., Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on: 1967; 13 21 27
25. Steyerberg E. S. Clinical prediction models. New York Springer: 2009
26. van der Gaag N. A., Rauws E. A., van Eijck C. H. et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. NEJM: 2010; 362 129 137
27. Paik W. H., Park Y. S., Hwang J. H. et al. Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 55 62
28. Vienne A., Hobeika E., Gouya H. et al. Prediction of drainage effectiveness during endoscopic stenting of malignant hilar strictures: the role of liver volume assessment. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 72 728 735
29. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. et al. The elements of statistical learning data mining, inference, and prediction. In: Springer series in statistics. New York, NY Springer-Verlag: 2009
30. Janssen K. JM, Donders A. RT, Harrell F. E. et al. Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore. J Clin Epidemiol: 2010; 63 721 727
31. Kawashima H., Itoh A., Ohno E. et al. Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg: 2013; 257 121 127
32. Hwang S., Song G-W, Ha T-Y et al. Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage tract recurrence after resection of perihilar bile duct cancer. World J Surg: 2012; 36 379 385
33. Takahashi Y., Nagino M., Nishio H. et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg: 2010; 97 1860 1866
34. Wiggers J. K., Coelen R. JS, Rauws E. A. et al. Preoperative endoscopic versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (DRAINAGE trial): design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterology: 2015; 15 20