Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 257, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 121-127

  Kawashima, Hiroki ^a   Itoh, Akihiro ^a   Ohno, Eizaburo ^b   Itoh, Yuya ^a   Ebata, Tomoki ^a   Nagino, Masato ^a   Goto, Hidemi ^a   Hirooka, Yoshiki ^b  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD); perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; postprocedure complication; preoperative biliary drainage; risk factors for complications

Indexed keywords

BILIRUBIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; CHOLANGITIS; ENDOSCOPIC NASOBILIARY DRAINAGE; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREATITIS; PANCREATOGRAPHY; PERIHILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL DRAINAGE;

AGED; BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGITIS; DRAINAGE; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PANCREATITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84871619888     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262b2e9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Povosky SP, Karpeh MS, Conlon KC, et al. Association ofpreoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:131-142. (Pubitemid 30191877)
2. Sewnath ME, Birjmohun RS, Rauws EA, et al. The effect of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:726-734. (Pubitemid 32506500)
3. Martignoni ME, Wagner M, Krahenbuhl L, et al. Effect of preoperative bil-iary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy Am J Surg. 2001;181:52-59. (Pubitemid 32209123)
4. Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR, et al. Effect of preoperative biliary decom-pression on pancreatoduodenectomy: associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:47-55. (Pubitemid 32619334)
5. Takada T. Is preoperative biliary drainage necessary according to evidence-based medicine? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:58-64. (Pubitemid 33690514)
6. 1Van Der Gaag NA, Rauws EA, van Eijck CH, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010;362: 129-137.
7. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. Preoperative management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1995;2: 215-223.
8. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, et al. Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:155-162.
9. Nagino M, Takada T, Miyazaki M, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:25-30. (Pubitemid 351279838)
10. Nagino M, Kamiya J, Nishio H, et al. Two hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer surgical outcome and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg. 2006;243:364-372. (Pubitemid 43327769)
11. Kloek JJ, van der Gaag NA, Aziz Y, et al. Endoscopic and percutaneous preop-erative biliary drainage in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:119-125.
12. Takahashi Y, Nagino M, Nishio H, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic bil-iary drainage catheter tract recurrence in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1860-1866.
13. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, et al. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1990;107:521-527. (Pubitemid 20156653)
14. Kinoshita H, Sakai K, Hirohashi K, et al. Preoperative portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 1986;10:803-808. (Pubitemid 17197533)
15. Natsume S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Clinical significance of left trisec-tionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an appraisal and complication with left hepatectomy Ann Surg. 2012;255:754-762.
16. Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, et al. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:297-305.
17. Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, et al. Parenchyma-preserving hepatec-tomy in the surgical treatment ofhilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:575-583.
18. Shimada H, Endo I, Sugita M, et al. Is parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy a noble option in the surgical treatment for high-risk patients with hilar bile duct cancer?Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388:33-41. (Pubitemid 37092463)
19. Sugiura T, Nishio H, Oda K, et al. Value ofmultidetector-row computed to-mography in diagnosis ofportal vein invasion by perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2008;32:1478-1484.
20. Senda Y, Nishio H, Oda K, et al. Value of multidetector row CT in the assess-ment of longitudinal extension of cholangiocarcinoma\-correlation between MDCT andmicroscopic findings. World J Surg. 2009;33:1459-1467.
21. Maguchi H, Takahashi K, Katanuma A, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14:441-446. (Pubitemid 47517211)
22. Arakura N, Takayama M, Ozaki Y, et al. Efficacy of preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:473-477.
23. Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M, et al. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management ofpatients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:242-248.
24. Chapman WC, Sharp KW, Weaver F, et al. Tumor seeding from percutaneous biliary catheters. Ann Surg. 1989;209:708-713.
25. Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carci-noma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;140:170-176.
26. Kawashima H, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, et al. Progress ofendoscopic ultrasonography and intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis ofmalignant biliary diseases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:69-74.
27. Itoh A, Goto H, Naitoh Y, et al. Intraductal ultrasonography in diagnos-ing tumor extension of cancer of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:251-260. (Pubitemid 27423805)
28. Kamiya S, Nagino M, Kanazawa H, et al. The value ofbile replacement during external biliary drainage: an analysis ofintestinal permeability integrity and microflora. Ann Surg. 2004;239:510-517. (Pubitemid 38372767)
29. Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes G, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complica-tions and their management. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:383-393.
30. Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endo-scopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective random-ized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:151-155. (Pubitemid 36236749)
31. Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T, et al. Surgical treatment ofhilar cholangiocar-cinoma in the "new era": the Nagoya University experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:449-454.
32. Nagino M, Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, et al. Logistic regression and discriminant analyses of hepatic failure after liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. World J Surg. 1993;17:250-255. (Pubitemid 23120857)
33. Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T, et al. Prophylaxis ofpost-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by an endoscopic pancreatic sponta-neous dislodgementstent. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1339-1346. (Pubitemid 350019054)