Consumer co-evolution as an important component of the eco-evolutionary feedback

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Hiltunen, Teppo ^a   Becks, Lutz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; COEVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MICROCOSM; PREDATOR; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREY SIZE;

CILIATE; COEVOLUTION; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGY; HUMAN; MICROCOSM; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATOR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA;

CILIOPHORA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECOSYSTEM; FEEDBACK; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DENSITY; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; TETRAHYMENA THERMOPHILA;

EID: 84942054501     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6226     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Murdoch, W. W., Briggs, C. J. & Nisbet, R. M. Consumer-Resource Dynamics (Princeton University Press, 2003).
2. Kendall, B. E., Prendergast, J. & Bjørnstad, O. N. The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in population cycles. Ecol. Lett. 3, 160-164 (1998).
3. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. The population dynamics of microparasites and their invertebrate hosts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 291, 451-524 (1981).
4. May, R. M. On relationships among various types of population models. Am. Nat. 107, 46-57 (1972).
5. Rosenzweig, M. L. & MacArthur, R. H. Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator prey interactions. Am. Nat. 97, 209-223 (1963).
6. Volterra, V. Variazione e fluttuazione del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. (Abridged translation in R. N. Chapman. 1931. Animal Ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York). Mem. Accad. Naz. Lincei 2, 31-113 (1926).
7. Lotka, A. J. Elements of Physical Biology (Williams & Wilkins, 1925).
8. Nicholson, A. J. & Bailey, V. A. The balance of animal populations. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 105, 551-598 (1935).
9. Becks, L., Ellner, S. P., Jones, L. E. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. The functional genomics of an eco-evolutionary feedback loop: linking gene expression, trait evolution, and community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 15, 492-501 (2012).
10. Yoshida, T., Jones, L. E., Ellner, S. P., Fussmann, G. F. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424, 303-306 (2003).
11. Abrams, P. A. & Matsuda, H. Prey adaptation as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evolution 51, 1742-1750 (1997).
12. Jones, L. E. & Ellner, S. P. Effects of rapid prey evolution on predator-prey cycles. J. Math. Biol. 55, 541-573 (2007).
13. Fussmann, G. F., Loreau, M. & Abrams, P. A. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct. Ecol. 21, 465-477 (2007).
14. Post, D. M. & Palkovacs, E. P. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks in community and ecosystem ecology: interactions between the ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 1629-1640 (2009).
15. Koch, H., Frickel, J., Valiadi, M. & Becks, L. Why rapid, adaptive evolution matters for community dynamics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2, 17 (2014).
16. Becks, L., Ellner, S. P., Jones, L. E. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Reduction of adaptive genetic diversity radically alters eco-evolutionary community dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 13, 989-997 (2010).
17. Hiltunen, T., Ellner, S. P., Hooker, G., Jones, L. E. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a three-species microcosm with intraguild predation: intriguingly complex. Adv. Ecol. Res. 50, 41-73 (2014).
18. Wymore, A. S., et al Genes to ecosystems: exploring the frontiers of ecology with one of the smallest biological units. New. Phytol. 191, 19-36 (2011).
19. Harmon, L. J., et al Evolutionary diversification in stickleback affects ecosystem functioning. Nature 458, 1167-1170 (2009).
20. Bassar, R. D., et al Local adaptation in Trinidadian guppies alters ecosystem processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3616-3621 (2010).
21. Agrawal, A. A., Johnson, M. T. J., Hastings, A. P. & Maron, J. L. A field experiment demonstrating plant life-history evolution and its eco-evolutionary feedback to seed predator populations. Am. Nat. 181, 35-45 (2013).
22. Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707-711 (2002).
23. Sinervo, B., Svensson, E. & Comendant, T. Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection. Nature 406, 985-988 (2000).
24. Ellner, S. P., Hairston, N. G., Kearns, C. M. & Babai, D. The roles of fluctuating selection and long-term diapause in microevolution of diapause timing in a freshwater copepod. Evolution. 53, 111-122 (1999).
25. Hairston, Jr. N. G., et al In Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time. (eds Rhodes, Jr. O. E., Chesser, R. K. & Smith, M. H. ) 109-145 (University of Chicago Press, 1996).
26. Pelletier, F., Clutton-Brock, T., Pemberton, J., Tuljapurkar, S. & Coulson, T. The evolutionary demography of ecological change: linking trait variation and population growth. Science 315, 1571-1574 (2007).
27. Hanski, I. & Mononen, T. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1025-1034 (2011).
28. Meyer, J. R. & Kassen, R. The effects of competition and predation on diversification in a model adaptive radiation. Nature 446, 432-435 (2007).
29. Friman, V.-P., Hiltunen, T., Laakso, J. & Kaitala, V. Prey resource availability drives evolution of predator prey interaction. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1625-1633 (2008).
30. Friman, V.-P. & Buckling, A. Effects of predation on real-time host-parasite coevolutionary dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 16, 39-45 (2013).
31. Gandon, S., Buckling, A., Decaestecker, E. & Day, T. Host-parasite coevolution and patterns of adaptation across time and space. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1861-1866 (2008).
32. Yoshida, T., et al Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions. PLoS Biol. 5, 1868-1879 (2007).
33. Friman, V. P., Laakso, J., Koivu-Orava, M. & Hiltunen, T. Pulsed-resource dynamics increase the asymmetry of antagonistic coevolution between a predatory protist and a prey bacterium. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2563-2573 (2011).
34. Hiltunen, T., Hairston, Jr. N. G., Hooker, G., Jones, L. E. & Ellner, S. P. A newly discovered role of evolution in previously published consumer-resource dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 17, 915-923 (2014).
35. Lopez-Pascua, L. d. & Buckling, A. Increasing productivity accelerates host-parasite coevolution. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 853-860 (2008).
36. Hochberg, M. E. & van Baalen, M. Antagonistic coevolution over productivity gradients. Am. Nat. 152, 630-634 (1998).
37. Hoeksema, J. D. Geographic mosaics of coevolution. Nature Education Knowledge 3, 19 (2012).
38. Friman, V. P., Jousset, A. & Buckling, A. Rapid prey evolution can alter the structure of predator-prey communities. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 374-380 (2014).
39. Hairston, Jr. N. G., Ellner, S. P., Geber, M. A., Yoshida, T. & Fox, J. A. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1114-1127 (2005).
40. Ellner, S. P., Geber, M. A. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Does rapid evolution matter? Measuring the rate of contemporary evolution and its impacts on ecological dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 14, 603-614 (2011).
41. Palkovacs, E. P. & Post, D. M. Eco-evolutionary interactions between predators and prey: can predator-induced changes to prey communities feed back to shape predator foraging traits? Evol. Ecol. Res. 10, 699-720 (2008).
42. Post, D. M., Palkovacs, E. P., Schielke, E. G. & Dodson, S. I. Intraspecific phenotypic variation in a predator affects zooplankton community structure and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology 89, 2019-2032 (2008).
43. Walsh, M. R. & Post, D. M. Interpopulation variation in a fish predator drives evolutionary divergence in prey in lakes. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2628-2637 (2011).
44. Palkovacs, E. P., Dion, K. B., Post, D. M. & Caccone, A. Independent evolutionary origins of landlocked alewife populations and rapid parallel evolution of phenotypic traits. Mol. Ecol. 17, 582-597 (2008).
45. Palkovacs, E. P. & Post, D. M. Experimental evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators drives community divergence in prey. Ecology 90, 300-305 (2009).
46. Gokhale, C. S., Papkou, A., Traulsen, A. & Schulenburg, H. Lotka-Volterra dynamics kills the Red Queen: population size fluctuations and associated stochasticity dramatically change host-parasite coevolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 245 (2013).
47. Lanfear, R., Kokko, H. & Eyre-Walker, A. Population size and the rate of evolution. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 29, 33-41 (2014).
48. Neher, R. Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 195-215 (2013).
49. Harrison, E., Laine, A.-L., Hietala, M. & Brockhurst, M. A. Rapidly fluctuating environments constrain coevolutionary arms races by impeding selective sweeps. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 2-9 (2013).
50. Ellner, S. & Becks, L. Rapid prey evolution and the dynamics of two-predator food webs. Theor. Ecol. 4, 133-152 (2010).
51. Burton, O. J., Phillips, B. L. & Travis, J. M. J. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1210-1220 (2010).
52. Tirok, K., Wirtz, K. & Gaedke, U. Predator-prey dynamics driven by feedback between functionally diverse trophic levels. PLoS ONE 6, e27357 (2011).
53. Thompson, J. N. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution (University of Chicago Press, 2005).
54. Hanski, I. & Saccheri, I. Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation. PLoS Biol. 4, e129 (2006).
55. Jones, E. I. & Gomulkiewicz, R. Biotic interactions, rapid evolution, and the establishment of introduced species. Am. Nat. 179, E28-E36 (2012).
56. Urban, M. C. & Skelly, D. K. Evolving metacommunities: towards an evolutionary perspective on metacommunities. Ecology 87, 1616-1626 (2006).
57. Morris, D. W. Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 2401-2411 (2011).
58. Rainey, P. B. & Bailey, M. J. Physical and genetic map of the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 11, 521-533 (1996).
59. Madigan, M. T., Martinko, J. M., Stahl, D. & Clark, D. P. Brock Biology of Microorganisms (Pearson/Benjamin Cummings, 2010).
60. Fussmann, G. F., Ellner, S. P., Shertzer, K. W. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 290, 1358-1360 (2000).
61. Hiltunen, T., Jones, L. E., Ellner, S. P. & Hairston, Jr. N. G. Temporal dynamics of a simple community with intraguild predation: an experimental test. Ecology 94, 773-779 (2013).
62. Brockhurst, M. A. & Koskella, B. Experimental coevolution of species interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 367-375 (2013).
63. Matz, C. & Kjelleberg, S. Off the hook-how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol. 13, 302-307 (2005).
64. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www. R-project. org/ (2012).