Joint NASA AMES/Langley experimental evaluation of integrated air/ground operations for en Route Free Maneuvering

Proceedings of the 6th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, ATM 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 400-412

  Barhydt, Richard ^a   Kopardekar, Parimal ^b   Battiste, Vernol ^b   Doble, Nathan ^b   Johnson, Walter ^b   Lee, Paul ^b   Prevot, Thomas ^b   Smith, Nancy ^b  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Air ground; Capacity; DAG TM; Free flight; Separation assurance

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; AIR NAVIGATION; AIR TRANSPORTATION; AIRCRAFT; AIRCRAFT CONTROL; CONTROLLERS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; FREE FLIGHT; NASA; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AIR/GROUND; CAPACITY; DISTRIBUTED AIR GROUND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; INSTRUMENT FLIGHT RULES; LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTERS; SEPARATION ASSURANCES; TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84942021291     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. NASA, 1999, Concept Definition for Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management (DAG-TM), http://www.asc.nasa.gov/aatt/dagconop.pdf
2. RTCA, 2000, National Airspace System Concept of Operations. RTCA, Washington, DC.
3. Haraldsdottir, Aslaug et al., 2003, Boeing Capacity-Increasing ATM Concept for 2020, 5th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
4. 'Group of Personalities', 2001, European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020, http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/growth/aeronautics2020/pdf/aeronautics2020-en.pdf
5. Lee, Paul et al., 2003, Free Maneuvering, Trajectory Negotiation, and Self-Spacing Concepts in Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management, 5th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
6. Wing, David et al., 2001, Airborne Use of Traffic Intent Information in a Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management Concept: Experiment Design and Preliminary Results, 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Seminar, Santa Fe, NM.
7. Battiste, V., et. al., 2001, Enabling Strategic Flight Deck Route Re-Planning Within A Modified ATC Environment: The Display of 4-D Intent Information on a CSD. Proceeding of the 2000 SAE World Aviation Congress and Exposition, San Diego, CA.
8. Barhydt, R and K Krishnamurthy, 2004, Design of a Multi-mode Flight Deck Decision Support System for Airborne Conflict Management, International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Toulouse, France.
9. Barhydt, R., M. Palmer, and T. Eischeid, 2004, Development and Evaluation of an Airborne Separation Assurance System for Autonomous Aircraft Operations, 24th International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
10. Prevot, Thomas, et al., 2002, A Multi-Fidelity Simulation Environment for Human-in-the-Loop Studies of Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management, AIAA-2002-4679, AIAA.
11. NASA Ames, 2004, Advanced Cockpit Situation Display of Traffic Information, http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/ihh/cdti/3d-cdti/3dcdti.html
12. Granada, S., et. al., 2005, Development and integration of a human-centered volumetric cockpit display for distributed air-ground operations. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Oklahoma City, OK.
13. Barhydt, Richard et al., 2004, ADS-B within a Multi-Aircraft Simulation for Distributed Air-Ground Traffic Management, 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, IEEE/AIAA.
14. Johnson, N. H., et. al., 2005, Distributed air/ground traffic management en-route free maneuvering rules of the road: requirements and implementation for a simulation of en-route self-seperation. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Oklahoma City, OK.
15. Saaty, T., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw Hill.
16. Stein, E. (1985), Air Traffic Controller Workload: An Examination of Workload Probe, DOT/FAA/CT-TN84/24, DOT/FAA, Atlantic City, NJ
17. Ruigrok, R. and M. Valenti-Clari, 2003, The Impact of Aircraft Intent Information and Traffic Separation Assurance Responsibility on En-Route Airspace Capacity, 5th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Budapest, Hungary.
18. Rognin, Laurence, et al., 2001, Implementing Changes in Controller-Pilot Tasks Distribution: the Introduction of Limited Delegation of Separation Assurance, International Workshop on Human Error, Safety, and System Development, Linkoping, Sweden.