Guardian angels of our better nature: Finding evidence of the benefits of design thinking

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, Issue 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, Pages

  Conlin, Luke David ^a   Chin, Doris B ^a   Blair, Kristen Pilner ^a   Cutumisu, Maria ^a   Schwartz, Daniel L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941996747     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Kolodner, J.L., Camp, P.J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ Into Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.
2. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M, Eris, O., Frey, D.D., Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
3. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
4. Dow, S. P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., and Schwartz, D. L., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010). Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Transactions on ComputerHuman Interaction (TOCHI), 17(4), 1-24.
5. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review Of Research In Education, 24, 61-100.
6. Schwartz, D. L., & Arena, D. (2013). Measuring what matters most: Choice-based assessments for the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Klehe, U. C., & Anderson, N. (2007). Working hard and working smart: Motivation and ability during typical and maximum performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 978-992.
8. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 482-486.
9. Cutumisu, M., Blair, K.P, Schwartz, D.L., & Chin, D.B. (2015). A game-based assessment of children's choices to seek feedback and to revise. Paper to be presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.