Psychosis prevention: A modified clinical high risk perspective from the recognition and prevention (RAP) Program

American Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 172, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 986-994

  Cornblatt, Barbara A ^a,b,c   Carrión, Ricardo E ^a,b,c   Auther, Andrea ^a,b,c   McLaughlin, Danielle ^a,b,c   Olsen, Ruth H ^a,b,c   John, Majnu ^a,b,c   Correll, Christoph U ^a,b,c  

^a ZUCKER HILLSIDE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^c DONALD AND BARBARA ZUCKER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT HOFSTRA NORTHWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; ANXIOLYTIC AGENT; MOOD STABILIZER; NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY INTERVENTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PSYCHOSIS; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VERBAL MEMORY; CHILD; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941982264     PISSN: 0002953X     EISSN: 15357228     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.13121686     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW, et al: The schizophrenia prodrome revisited: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29:633-651
2. Fusar-Poli P, Borgwardt S, Bechdolf A, et al: The psychosis high-risk state: a comprehensive state-of-the-Art review. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:107-120
3. Correll CU, Hauser M, Auther AM, et al: Research in people with psychosis risk syndrome: a review of the current evidence and future directions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2010; 51:390-431
4. Yu ng AR, Nelson B, Stanford C, et al: Validation of " prodromal" criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up. Schizophr Res 2008; 105:10-17
5. Cannon TD, Cor nblatt B, McGorry P: The empirical status of the ultra high-risk (prodromal) research paradigm. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33:661-664
6. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J: Early detec tion and intervention in the initial prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003; 36(suppl 3):S162-S167
7. McGorry PD, Killackey E, Yung A: Early intervention in psychosis: concepts, evidence, and future directions. World Psychiatry 2008; 7: 148-156
8. Cornblatt B, Lencz T, Obuchowski M: The schizophrenia prodrome: treatment andhigh-riskperspectives. SchizophrRes 2002;54:177-186
9. Schultze-Lutter F: Subjective symptoms of schizophrenia in research and the clinic: the basic symptom concept. Schizophr Bull 2009; 35:5-8
10. Fusar-Poli P, B onoldi I, Yung AR, et al: Predicting psychosis: metaanalysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69:220-229
11. Yung AR, Yuen HP, McGorry P D, et al: Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39:964-971
12. Miller TJ,McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, et al: Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29: 703-715
13. Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, et al: Prospective diagnosis of the initial prodrome for schizophrenia based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes: preliminary evidence of interrater reliability and pre dictive validity. AmJ Psychiatry 2002; 159:863-865
14. MillerTJ, McGlashanTH, Woods SW, et al: Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatr Q 1999; 70:273-287
15. Schultze-Lutter F, Schimmelmann BG, Ruhrmann S, et al: " A rose is a rose is a rose" , but at-risk criteria differ. Psychopathology 2013; 46: 75-87
16. Nelson B,Yuen K,Yung AR Ultra high risk (UHR for psychosis criteria: are there different levels of risk for transition to psychosis? Schizophr Res 2011, 125, 62-68
17. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B, et al: Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a mult isite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:28-37
18. Mason O, Startup M, Halpin S, et al: Risk factors for transition to first episode psychosis among individuals with "at-risk mental states" . Schizophr Res 2004; 71:227-237
19. Riecher-Rössler A, Pflueger MO, Aston J, et al: Efficacy of using cognitive status in predicting psychosis: a 7-year follow-up. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66:1023-1030
20. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Salokangas RK, et al: Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:241-251
21. Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, et al: Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features. Schizophr Res 2004; 67:131-142
22. Nelson B,YuenHP,WoodSJ, et al: Long-term follow-up of a group at ultra high risk ("prodromal") for psychosis: the PACE 400 study. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:793-802
23. Demjaha A, Valmaggia L, Stahl D, et al: Disorganization/cognitive and negative symptom dimensions in the at-risk mental state predict subsequent transition to psychosis. Schizophr Bull 2012; 38:351-359
24. ThompsonA,NelsonB,YungA:Predictivevalidityof clinical variables in the " at risk" for psychosis population: international comparison with results from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study. Schizophr Res 2011; 126:51-57
25. Weinberger DR: Implications of normal brain development for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44: 660-669
26. Cornblatt BA, Lencz T, Smith CW,et al: Can antidepressants be used to treat the schizophrenia prodrome Results of a prospective, naturalistic treatment study of adolescents. J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68:5 46-557
27. Carrión RE, Goldberg TE, McLaughlin D, et al: Impact of neurocognition on social and role functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168:806-813
28. Carrión RE, McLaughlin D, Goldberg TE, et al: Prediction of functional outcome in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; 70:1133-1142
29. Lencz T, Smith CW, McLau ghlin D, et al: Generalized and specific neurocognitive deficits in prodromal schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 59:863-871
30. Orvaschel H, Puig-Antich J: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schi zophrenia for School-Age Children-Epidemiologic Version. Fort Lauderdale, Fla,Center for Psychological Studies,Nova Southeastern University, 1994
31. Beck A, Steer R, Carbin M: Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 8:77-100
32. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al: An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56:893-897
33. Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, et al: Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophre nia. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33:688-702
34. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53:457-481
35. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York, Wiley, 2000
36. AkaikeH: Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J Econom 1981; 16:3-14
37. S auerbrei W, Schumacher M: A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the Cox regression model. Stat Med 1992; 11:2093-2109
38. LemeshowS,HosmerDWJr.:Areview of goodness offit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models.AmJ Epidemiol 1982; 115:92-106
39. Do CB, Batzoglou S: What is the expectation maximization algorithm? Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:897-899
40. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J: Probably at-risk, but certainly ill: advocating the introduction of a psychosis spectrum disorder in DSM-V. Schizophr Res 2010; 120:23-37
41. Cannon TD, Addington J, Bearden C, et al: The development and implementation of a psychosis risk prediction algorithm. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 75:277S
42. Seidman LJ, Giuliano AJ, Meyer EC, et al: Neuropsychology of the prodrome to psychosis in the NAPLS consortium: relationship to family history and conversion to psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67:578-588
43. Woodberry KA, Giuliano AJ, Seidman LJ: Premorbid IQ in schizophrenia: a meta-Analytic review. Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165: 579-587
44. Jahshan C, Heaton RK, Golshan S, et al: Course of neurocognitive deficits in the prodrome and first episode of schizophrenia. Neuropsychology 2010; 24:109-120
45. Fusar-Poli P, ByrneM, Valmaggia L, et al: Social dysfunction predicts two years clinical outcome in people at ultra high risk for psychosis. J Psychiatr Res 2010; 44:294-301
46. Tarbox SI, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, et al: Premorbid functional development and conversion to psychosis in clinical high-risk youths. Dev Psychopathol 2013; 25:1171-1186
47. Velthorst E, Nieman DH, Linszen D, et al: Disability in people clinically at high risk of psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197:278-284
48. CornblattBA,CarriónRE, Addington J, et al:Risk factors for psychosis: impaired socialandrole functioning.SchizophrBull 2012; 38:1247-1257
49. Michel C, Ruhrmann S, Schimmelmann BG, et al: A stratified model for psychosis prediction in clinical practice. Schizophr Bull 2014; 40: 1533-1542
50. Nieman DH, Ruhrmann S, Dragt S, et al: Psychosis prediction: stratification of risk estimation with information-processing and premorbid functioning variables. Schizophr Bull 2014; 40:1482-1490
51. Perkins DO, Jeffries CD, Addington J, et al: Towards a psychosis risk blood diagnostic for persons experiencing high-risk symptoms: preliminary results from theNAPLSproject. Schizophr Bull 2015; 41: 419-428
52. Cannon TD, Chung Y, He G, et al: Progressive reduction in cortical thickness as psychosis develops: a multisite longitudinal neuroimaging study of youth at elevated clinical risk. Biol Psychiat ry 2015; 77:147-157