Psychosis prediction: Stratification of risk estimation with information-processing and premorbid functioning variables

Schizophrenia Bulletin

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1482-1490

  Nieman, Dorien H ^a   Ruhrmann, Stephan ^b   Dragt, Sara ^a   Soen, Francesca ^a   Van Tricht, Mirjam J ^a   Koelman, Johannes H T M ^a   Bour, Lo J ^a   Velthorst, Eva ^a   Becker, Hiske E ^a   Weiser, Mark ^c   Linszen, Don H ^a   De Haan, Lieuwe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

clinical high risk; P300 event related potential; premorbid adjustment; prognostic index; psychosis prediction

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;

ADJUSTMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRIEF PSYCHOTIC DISORDER; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DSM-IV; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PSYCHOSIS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHIZOAFFECTIVE PSYCHOSIS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SCHIZOPHRENIFORM DISORDER; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; STRATIFICATION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; DISEASE COURSE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; PHYSIOLOGY; PRODROMAL SYMPTOM; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DISEASE PROGRESSION; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PRODROMAL SYMPTOMS; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84913535663     PISSN: 05867614     EISSN: 17451701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbt145     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Häfner H, Maurer K, Löffler W, et al. The ABC Schizophrenia Study: a preliminary overview of the results. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:380-386.
2. Schultze-Lutter F, Ruhrmann S, Berning J, Maier W, Klosterkötter J. Basic symptoms and ultrahigh risk criteria: symptom development in the initial prodromal state. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36:182-191.
3. Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, et al. Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk ("prodromal") group. Schizophr Res. 2003;60:21-32.
4. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J. Early detection and intervention in the initial prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003;36(suppl 3):S162-S167.
5. McGlashan T, Walsh B, Woods SW. The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome. Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010.
6. Schultze-Lutter F, Schimmelmann BG, Ruhrmann S, Michel C. ?A rose is a rose is a rose', but at-risk criteria differ. Psychopathology. 2013; 46:75-87.
7. Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, et al. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:220-229.
8. Klosterkötter J, Hellmich M, Steinmeyer EM, Schultze- Lutter F. Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:158-164.
9. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J, Picker H, Steinmeyer E, Ruhrmann S. Predicting first-episode psychosis by basic symptom criteria. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2007;4:11-22.
10. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J. Subthreshold of psychosis- a challenge to diagnosis and treatment. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2010;7:72-87.
11. Insel TR. Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature. 2010;468:187-193.
12. Seidman LJ, Giuliano AJ, Meyer EC, et al.; North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS) Group. Neuropsychology of the prodrome to psychosis in the NAPLS consortium: relationship to family history and conversion to psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:578-588.
13. Fusar-Poli PG, Deste R, Smieskova R, et al. Cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis: a meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in prodromal psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:62-71.
14. Cannon TD. Clinical and genetic high-risk strategies in understanding vulnerability to psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2005;79:35-44.
15. Pukrop R, Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Bechdolf A, Brockhaus-Dumke A, Klosterkötter J. Neurocognitive indicators for a conversion to psychosis: comparison of patients in a potentially initial prodromal state who did or did not convert to a psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2007;92:116-125.
16. Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cornblatt BA, et al. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 2): overview and recruitment. Schizophr Res. 2012;142:77-82.
17. Riecher-Rössler A, Pflueger MO, Aston J, et al. Efficacy of using cognitive status in predicting psychosis: a 7-year followup. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66:1023-1030.
18. Zimmermann R, Gschwandtner U, Wilhelm FH, Pflueger MO, Riecher-Rössler A, Fuhr P. EEG spectral power and negative symptoms in at-risk individuals predict transition to psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2010;123:208-216.
19. Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:28-37.
20. Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Salokangas RK, et al. Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European Prediction of Psychosis Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:241-251.
21. Nieman DH, Rike WH, Becker HE, et al. Prescription of antipsychotic medication to patients at ultra high risk of developing psychosis. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;24:223-228.
22. Becker HE, Nieman DH, Dingemans PM, van de Fliert JR, de Haan L, Linszen DH. Verbal fluency as a possible predictor for psychosis. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25:105-110.
23. Velthorst E, Nieman DH, Becker HE, et al. Baseline differences in clinical symptomatology between ultra high risk subjects with and without a transition to psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2009;109:60-65.
24. Dragt S, Nieman DH, Veltman D, et al. Environmental factors and social adjustment as predictors of a first psychosis in subjects at ultra high risk. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:69-76.
25. van Tricht MJ, Nieman DH, Koelman JH, et al. Reduced parietal P300 amplitude is associated with an increased risk for a first psychotic episode. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:642-648.
26. Bramon E, Rabe-Hesketh S, Sham P, Murray RM, Frangou S. Meta-analysis of the P300 and P50 waveforms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004;70:315-329.
27. Nieman DH, Koelman JH, Linszen DH, Bour LJ, Dingemans PM, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Clinical and neuropsychological correlates of the P300 in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2002;55:105-113.
28. Jeon YW, Polich J. Meta-analysis of P300 and schizophrenia: patients, paradigms, and practical implications. Psychophysiology. 2003;40:684-701.
29. van der Stelt O, Lieberman JA, Belger A. Auditory P300 in high-risk, recent-onset and chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005;77:309-320.
30. Frommann I, Brinkmeyer J, Ruhrmann S, et al. Auditory P300 in individuals clinically at risk for psychosis. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;70:192-205.
31. Bramon E, Shaikh M, Broome M, et al. Abnormal P300 in people with high risk of developing psychosis. Neuroimage. 2008;41:553-560.
32. Ozgürdal S, Gudlowski Y, Witthaus H, et al. Reduction of auditory event-related P300 amplitude in subjects with at-risk mental state for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008;105:272-278.
33. Jahshan C, Cadenhead KS, Rissling AJ, Kirihara K, Braff DL, Light GA. Automatic sensory information processing abnormalities across the illness course of schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2012;42:85-97.
34. Atkinson RJ, Michie PT, Schall U. Duration mismatch negativity and P3a in first-episode psychosis and individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:98-104.
35. Hall RC. Global Assessment of Functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995;36:267-275.
36. Schmand B, Bakker D, Saan R, Louman J. The Dutch Reading Test for Adults: a measure of premorbid intelligence level. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1991;22:15-19.
37. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
38. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1997.
39. Andrews G, Peters L. The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:80-88.
40. McGlashan TH, Miller TJ, Woods SW, Rosen JH, Hoffman RE, Davdison L. Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. New Haven, CT: PRIME Research Clinic Yale School of Medicine; 2001.
41. Schultze-Lutter F, Klosterkötter J. Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms - Prediction List, BSABS-P. Cologne, Germany: University of Cologne; 2002.
42. Schultze-Luttter F, Addington J, Ruhrmann S, Klosterkötter J. Schizophrenia Proneness Instrument, Adult version (SPI-A). Rome, Italy: Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l.: 2007.
43. Cannon-Spoor HE, Potkin SG, Wyatt RJ. Measurement of premorbid adjustment in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1982;8:470-484.
44. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
45. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;55:468-484.
46. Duncan CC, Barry RJ, Connolly JF, et al. Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1883-1908.
47. Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, McGorry PD. Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features. Schizophr Res. 2004;67:131-142.
48. Yung AR, Nelson B, Stanford C, et al. Validation of "prodromal" criteria to detect individuals at ultra high risk of psychosis: 2 year follow-up. Schizophr Res. 2008;105:10-17.
49. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
50. Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2006.
51. Ruhrmann S, Klösterkotter J, Bodatsch M, et al. Chances and risks of predicting psychosis. Eur Arch Psych Clin Neurosci. 2012;262(suppl 2):85-90.
52. Bodatsch M, Ruhrmann S, Wagner M, et al. Prediction of psychosis by mismatch negativity. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69:959-966.
53. Addington J, Penn D, Woods SW, Addington D, Perkins DO. Social functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2008;99:119-124.
54. Cornblatt BA, Carrión RE, Addington J, et al. Risk factors for psychosis: impaired social and role functioning. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:1247-1257.
55. Davidson M, Reichenberg A, Rabinowitz J, Weiser M, Kaplan Z, Mark M. Behavioral and intellectual markers for schizophrenia in apparently healthy male adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1328-1335.
56. Haas GL, Sweeney JA. Premorbid and onset features of firstepisode schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1992;18:373-386.
57. Kelley ME, Gilbertson M, Mouton A, van Kammen DP. Deterioration in premorbid functioning in schizophrenia: a developmental model of negative symptoms in drug-free patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:1543-1548.
58. Strauss JS, Carpenter WT Jr. Prediction of outcome in schizophrenia. III. Five-year outcome and its predictors. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34:159-163.
59. Pantelis C, Velakoulis D, McGorry PD, et al. Neuroanatomical abnormalities before and after onset of psychosis: a crosssectional and longitudinal MRI comparison. Lancet. 2003;361:281-288.
60. McCarley RW, Salisbury DF, Hirayasu Y, et al. Association between smaller left posterior superior temporal gyrus volume on magnetic resonance imaging and smaller left temporal P300 amplitude in first-episode schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:321-331.
61. van Mastrigt S, Addington J. Assessment of premorbid function in first-episode schizophrenia: modifications to the Premorbid Adjustment Scale. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2002;27:92-101.