Prospective, Randomized Study on the Use of a Prosthetic Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia of Permanent Colostomy

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 943-949

  Vierimaa, Mika ^a   Klintrup, Kai ^a   Biancari, Fausto ^a   Victorzon, Mikael ^b,c   Carpelan Holmström, Monika ^d   Kössi, Jyrki ^c,e   Kellokumpu, Ilmo ^f   Rauvala, Erkki ^a   Ohtonen, Pasi ^a   Mäkelä, Jyrki ^a   Rautio, Tero ^a  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b VAASA CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^d HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^e PÄIJÄT HÄME CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^f Central Finland Health Care District   (Finland)

Author keywords

Abdominoperineal resection; Laparoscopy; Parastomal hernia; Prophylactic mesh

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COLOSTOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; FOLLOW UP; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INTRAPERITONEAL ONLAY MESH; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARASTOMAL HERNIA; PROPHYLAXIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; STOMA; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROPHYLACTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HERNIORRHAPHY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPHYLACTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; SURGICAL MESH; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84941881946     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000443     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. H otouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL. The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:e202-e214.
2. I sraesson LA. Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg. 2005;29:1086-1089.
3. Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M. Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:71-76.
4. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:931-936.
5. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2004;91:280-282.
6. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1356-1358.
7. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg. 2009;249:583-587.
8. López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, et al. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16:661-667.
9. L ee L, Saleem A, Landry T, Latimer E, Chaudhury P, Feldman LS. Cost effectiveness of mesh prophylaxis to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing permanent colostomy for rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:82-91.
10. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Experiences with a prophylactic mesh in 93 consecutive ostomies. World J Surg. 2010;34:1637-1640.
11. mietaski M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18:1-6.
12. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg. 2009;33:118-122.
13. Berger D. Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (DynaMesh IPST). Hernia. 2008;12:243-246.
14. Janson AR, Jänes A, Israelsson LA. Laparoscopic stoma formation with a prophylactic prosthetic mesh. Hernia. 2010;14:495-498.
15. López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Espin-Basany E. Prosthetic mesh in parastomal hernia prevention: laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1006-1007.
16. Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, V-Haaren-de Haan H, Aufenacker TJ, Rosman C, Bleichrodt RP. Prevention of a parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh in patients undergoing permanent end-colostomy: the PREVENT-trial-study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:226.
17. Fleshman JW, Beck DE, Hyman N, Wexner SD, Bauer J, George V; PRISM Study Group. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:623-631.
18. Williams NS, Nair R, Bhan C. Stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART): a procedure to prevent parastomal herniation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:169.
19. A sif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, et al. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3430-3434.
20. Hansson BM. Parastomal hernia: treatment and prevention 2013-where do we go from here? Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1467-1470.
21. Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T, Valdes J, Muysoms FE, Bleichrodt RP. The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:494-500.