A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study of non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix fascial sublay for parastomal reinforcement in patients undergoing surgery for permanent abdominal wall ostomies

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 623-631

  Fleshman, James W ^a   Beck, David E ^b   Hyman, Neil ^c   Wexner, Steven D ^d   Bauer, Joel ^e   George, Virgilio ^f  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biologic tissue matrix; Complications; Ostomy; Parastomal hernia; Porcine acellular dermal matrix; Reinforcement; Strattice

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL; ADULT; COLOSTOMY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARASTOMAL HERNIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PORCINE DERIVED ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; SIGMOIDECTOMY; STOMA; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; ANIMALS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; COLOSTOMY; FEMALE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWINE;

EID: 84902011237     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000106     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2003;90:784-793 (Pubitemid 36886377)
2. M ylonakis E, Scarpa M, Barollo M, Yarnoz C, Keighley MR. Life table analysis of hernia following end colostomy construction. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:334-337
3. De Raet J, Delvaux G, Haentjens P, Van Nieuwenhove Y. Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1806-1809
4. I sraelsson LA . Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88:113-125
5. S hellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1562-1572
6. Gögenur I, Mortensen J, Harvald T, Rosenberg J, Fischer A. Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1131-1135 (Pubitemid 44221296)
7. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA . Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg. 2009;33:118-122
8. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA . Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1356-1358 (Pubitemid 39602862)
9. Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA . Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2004;91:280-282 (Pubitemid 38375765)
10. E llis CN. Short-term outcomes with the use of bioprosthetics for the management of parastomal hernias. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:279-283
11. Geisler DJ, Reilly JC, Vaughan SG, Glennon EJ, Kondylis PD. Safety and outcome of use of nonabsorbable mesh for repair of fascial defects in the presence of open bowel. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1118-1123 (Pubitemid 36992997)
12. Prieto L, Thorsen H, Juul K. Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:62
13. S erra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg. 2009;249:583-587
14. Berger D. Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal onlay mesh (Dynamesh IPST). Hernia. 2008;12:243-246
15. Janson AR, Jänes A, Israelsson LA . Laparoscopic stoma formation with a prophylactic prosthetic mesh. Hernia. 2010;14:495-498
16. Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G. Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:672-675 (Pubitemid 44363590)
17. Vijayasekar C, Marimuthu K, Jadhav V, Mathew G. Parastomal hernia: Is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation. Tech Coloproctol. 2008;12:309-313
18. H auters P, Cardin JL, Lepere M, Valverde A, Cossa JP, Auvray S. Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation. Hernia. 2012;16:655-660
19. H ammond TM, Huang A, Prosser K, Frye JN, Williams NS. Parastomal hernia prevention using a novel collagen implant: a randomised controlled phase 1 study. Hernia. 2008;12:475-481
20. L ópez-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, et al. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16:661-667
21. T am KW, Wei PL, Kuo LJ, Wu CH. Systematic review of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. World J Surg. 2010;34:2723-2729
22. Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, Chan CL. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:637-645
23. S habbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:931-936
24. S ajid MS, Kalra L, Hutson K, Sains P. Parastomal hernia as a consequence of colorectal cancer resections can prophylactically be controlled by mesh insertion at the time of primary surgery: a literature based systematic review of published trials. Minerva Chir. 2012;67:289-296.