Challenges in Identifying Patients with Type 2 Diabetes for Quality-Improvement Interventions in Primary Care Settings and the Importance of Valid Disease Registries

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2015, Pages S77-S82

  Wozniak, Lisa ^a   Soprovich, Allison ^a   Rees, Sandra ^a   Johnson, Steven T ^a,b   Majumdar, Sumit R ^a   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b ATHABASCA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health program evaluation; Panel management; Patient registry; RE AIM; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; COOPERATION; DISEASE REGISTRY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RELIABILITY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; REGISTER;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84941880847     PISSN: 14992671     EISSN: 23523840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Li R., Simon J., Bodenheimer T., et al. Organizational factors affecting the adoption of diabetes care management processes in physician organizations. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:2312-2316.
2. Bodenheimer T., Wagner E.H., Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: The chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002, 288:1909-1914.
3. Bodenheimer T. Strategies to improve diabetes care. Am Fam Physician 2003, 68(1500):1503-1504. 6.
4. Renders C.M., Valk G.D., Griffin S.J., et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: A systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:1821-1833.
5. Stroebel R.J., Scheitel S.M., Fitz J.S., et al. A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002, 28:441-450.
6. Rittenhouse D.R., Shortell S.M., Gillies R.R., et al. Improving chronic illness care: Findings from a national study of care management processes in large physician practices. Med Care Res Rev 2010, 67:301-320.
7. Schmittdiel J., Bodenheimer T., Solomon N.A., et al. Brief report: The prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations: A national survey. J Gen Intern Med 2005, 20:855-858.
8. Wozniak L., Rees S., Soprovich A., et al. Applying the RE-AIM framework to the Alberta's Caring for Diabetes Project: A protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of primary care quality improvement interventions. BMJ 2012, 2:5.
9. Johnson S.T., Mundt C., Soprovich A., et al. Healthy eating and active living for diabetes in primary care networks (HEALD-PCN): Rationale, design, and evaluation of a pragmatic controlled trial for adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Pub Health 2012, 12:455-464.
10. Johnson J.A., Al Sayah F., Wozniak L., et al. Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: Rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:258-270.
11. Johnson J.A., Al Sayah F., Rees S., et al. Collaborative care vs screening and follow-up for patients with depression and diabetes: Results of a primary-care based comparative effectiveness trial. Diabetes Care 2014, 37:3220-3226.
12. Johnson S.T., Mundt C., Qiu W., et al. Increase in daily steps after an exercise specialist led lifestyle intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A controlled implementation trial. J Phys Activ Health 2015, In press.
13. Glasgow R.E., Vogt T.M., Boles S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999, 89:1322.
14. Wozniak L., Soprovich A., Rees S., et al. Impact of organizational stability on adoption of quality-improvement interventions for diabetes in primary care settings. Can J Diabetes 2015, 39(Suppl 2):S100-S112.
15. Wozniak L., Soprovich A., Mundt C., et al. Contextualizing the proven effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes in primary care: A qualitative assessment based on the RE-AIM Framework. Can J Diabetes 2015, 39(Suppl 2):S92-S99.
16. Wozniak L., Soprovich A., Rees S., et al. Contextualizing the effectiveness of a collaborative care model for primary care patients with diabetes and depression (TeamCare): A qualitative assessment using RE-AIM. Can J Diabetes 2015, 39(Suppl 2):S83-S91.
17. Rosser W.W., Colwill J.M., Kasperski J., Wilson L. Progress of Ontario's Family Health Team model: A patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med 2011, 9:165-171.
18. Rittenhouse D.R., Shortell S.M. The patient-centered medical home: Will it stand the test of health reform?. JAMA 2009, 301:2038-2040.
19. Reid R.J., Coleman K., Johnson E.A., et al. The Group Health medical home at year two: Cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29:835-843.
20. Alberta Primary Care Networks. Panel and EMR. Accessed June 8, 2015. http://www.pcnevolution.ca/supportwheel/Pages/PhysicianandPanel.aspx.
21. Solberg L.I., Asche S.E., Margolis K.L., Whitebird R.R. Measuring an organization's ability to manage change: The change process capability questionnaire and its use for improving depression care. Am J Med Qual 2008, 23:193-200.
22. Helfrich C.D., Li Y.F., Sharp N.D., Sales A.E. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci 2009, 4:38.
23. Institute of Health Economics. Alberta Diabetes Surveillance System: Diabetes in Alberta. Accessed June 8, 2015. http://www.albertadiabetes.ca/.
24. Morse J.M., Field P.A. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals 1995, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 2nd edn.
25. Mayan M.J. Essentials of qualitative inquiry 2009, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
26. Glasgow R.E., Strycker L.A., Kurz D., et al. Recruitment for an internet-based diabetes self-management program: Scientific and ethical implications. Behav Med 2010, 40:40-48.
27. Morse J.M., Barret M., Mayan M., et al. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qualitat Meth 2002, 1:2.
28. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. Fourth generation evaluation 1989, Sage, Newbury Park.
29. QSR International. Nvivo 10. Accessed June 8, 2015. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx.
30. Johnson J.A. Alberta Diabetes Surveillance System, Institute of Health Economics. Alberta diabetes atlas 2009 2009, Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton.
31. Shortell S.M., Gillies R., Siddique J., et al. Improving chronic illness care: A longitudinal cohort analysis of large physician organizations. Med Care 2009, 47:932-939.
32. McEvoy P., Laxade S. Patient registries: A central component of the chronic care model. Br J Comm Nurs 2008, 13:127-128. 130-3.