Contextualizing the Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Model for Primary Care Patients with Diabetes and Depression (Teamcare): A Qualitative Assessment Using RE-AIM

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2015, Pages S83-S91

  Wozniak, Lisa ^a   Soprovich, Allison ^a   Rees, Sandra ^a   Al Sayah, Fatima ^a   Majumdar, Sumit R ^a   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaborative care; Depression; Mixed methods; Qualitative research; Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption Implementation and Maintenance (RE AIM); Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE MANAGER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSULTATION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REACH EFFECTIVENESS ADOPTION IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE; TEAM CARE; COMPLICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 84941874276     PISSN: 14992671     EISSN: 23523840     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2015.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Broemeling A.M., Watson D.E., Prebtani F. Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: Implications for policy and practice. Healthc Q 2008, 11:70-76.
2. Ali S., Stone M.A., Peters J.L., et al. The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2006, 23:1165-1173.
3. Goldney R.D., Phillips P.J., Fisher L.J., Wilson D.H. Diabetes, depression, and quality of life: A population study. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1066-1070.
4. Wolff J.L., Starfield B., Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002, 162:2269-2276.
5. Gilbody S., Bower P., Fletcher J., et al. Collaborative care for depression: A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2006, 166:2314-2321.
6. van der Feltz-Cornelis C.M., Nuyen J., Stoop C., et al. Effect of interventions for major depressive disorder and significant depressive symptoms in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatr 2010, 32:380-395.
7. Thota A.B., Sipe T.A., Byard G.J., et al. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: A community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2012, 42:525-538.
8. Katon W.J., Lin E.H., Von Korff M., et al. Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses. N Engl J Med 2010, 363:2611-2620.
9. Katon W.J., Von Korff M., Lin E.H.B., et al. The pathways study: A randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatr 2004, 61:1042-1049.
10. Jacob V., Chattopadhyay S.K., Sipe T.A., et al. Economics of collaborative care for management of depressive disorders: A community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2012, 42:539-549.
11. Richards D.A., Hill J.J., Gask L., et al. Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013, 347:f4913.
12. Richards D.A., Lovell K., Gilbody S., et al. Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: A randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med 2008, 38:279-287.
13. Schmitt M.H. Collaboration improves the quality of care: Methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. J Interprof Care 2001, 15:47-66.
14. Wagner E.H., Glasgow R.E., Davis C., et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach. J Comm J Qual Improv 2001, 27:63-80.
15. Johnson J.A., Al Sayah F., Wozniak L., et al. Controlled trial of a collaborative primary care team model for patients with diabetes and depression: Rationale and design for a comprehensive evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2012, 12:258.
16. Johnson J.A., Al Sayah F., Rees S., et al. Collaborative care vs. screening and follow-up for patients with depression and diabetes: Results of a primary-care based comparative effectiveness trial. Diabetes Care 2014, 37:3220-3226.
17. Glasgow R.E., Vogt T.M., Boles S.M. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Pub Health 1999, 89:1322-1327.
18. Glasgow R.E., McKay H.G., Piette J.D., Reynolds K.D. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?. Patient Educ Couns 2001, 44:119-127.
19. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Reach effectiveness adoption implementation maintenance (RE-AIM). Accessed June 17, 2015. http://www.re-aim.org/.
20. Glasgow R.E. Translating research to practice: Lessons learned, areas for improvement, and future directions. Diabetes Care 2003, 26:2451-2456.
21. Wozniak L., Rees S., Soprovich A., et al. Applying the RE-AIM framework to the Alberta's Caring for Diabetes Project: A protocol for a comprehensive evaluation of primary care quality improvement interventions. BMJ Open 2012, 2:5.
22. Wozniak L., Soprovich A., Rees S., et al. Challenges in identifying patients with type 2 diabetes for quality-improvement interventions in primary care settings and the importance of valid disease registries. Can J Diabetes 2015, 39(Suppl 2):S77-S82.
23. Wozniak L., Soprovich A., Rees S., et al. Impact of organizational stability on adoption of quality-improvement interventions for diabetes in primary care settings. Can J Diabetes 2015, 39(Suppl 2):S100-S112.
24. Breitenstein S.M., Gross D., Garvey C.A., et al. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health 2010, 33:164-173.
25. Mowbray C.T., Holter M.C., Teague G.B., Bybee D. Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. Am J Eval 2003, 24:315-340.
26. Rittenhouse D.R., Shortell S.M. The patient-centered medical home: Will it stand the test of health reform?. JAMA 2009, 301:2038-2040.
27. University of Washington, Group Health Cooperative. TEAMcare: Managing depression, diabetes and coronary heart disease in primary care. Accessed June 17, 2015. http://www.teamcarehealth.org/Portals/0/Documents/TEAMcare%20Intervention%20Manual%202015.pdf.
28. Katon W., Ludman E.J., Simon G. The Depression Helpbook 2008, Bull Publishing Group, Boulder. 2nd edn.
29. The Support Network. Accessed June 17, 2015. http://www.thesupportnetwork.com/.
30. Morse J.M., Field P.A. Qualitative research methods for health professionals 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 2nd edn.
31. Mayan M.J. Essentials of qualitative inquiry 2009, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek.
32. Morse J.M., Barret M., Mayan M., et al. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Meth 2002, 1:2.
33. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. Fourth-generation evaluation 1989, Sage, Newbury Park.
34. QSR International. Nvivo 10. Accessed June 17, 2015. http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_nvivo.aspx.
35. The National Diabetes Managment Strategy. Primary Care Diabetes Boot Camp. Accessed June 17, 2015. http://tndms.ca/bootcamp/diabetes_bootcamp.html.
36. Alberta Primary Care Networks. Alberta PCNs. Accessed June 17, 2015. https://www.pcnpmo.ca/alberta-pcns/Pages/default.aspx.
37. Miller C., Ross N., Freeman M. Shared learning and clinical teamwork: New directions in education for multiprofessional practice 1999, English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London.
38. Suter E., Arndt J., Arthur N., et al. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care 2009, 23:41-51.
39. Craven M.A., Bland R. Better practices in collaborative mental health care: An analysis of the evidence base. Can J Psychiatr 2006, 51(Suppl 1):S7-S72.
40. Headrick L.A., Wilcock P.M., Batalden P.B. Interprofessional working and continuing medical education. BMJ 1998, 316:771-774.
41. Zwarenstein M., Reeves S. Working together but apart: Barriers and routes to nurse-physician collaboration. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002, 28:242-247. 209.
42. Al Sayah F., Szafran O., Robertson S., et al. Nursing perspectives on factors influencing interdisciplinary teamwork in the Canadian primary care setting. J Clin Nurs 2014, 23:2968-2979.
43. Hall P. Interprofessional teamwork: professional cultures as barriers. J Interprof Care 2005, 19(Suppl 1):S188-S196.
44. Xyrichis A., Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2008, 45:140-153.
45. A national interprofessional competency framework 2010, Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
46. Sommers L.S., Marton K.I., Barbaccia J.C., Randolph J. Physician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med 2000, 160:1825-1833.
47. Henneman E.A., Lee J.L., Cohen J.I. Collaboration: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 1995, 21:103-109.
48. Wagner E.H. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000, 320:569-572.
49. Gunn J., Diggens J., Hegarty K., Blashki G. A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2006, 6:88.