Internet of things: Privacy issues revisited

Computer Law and Security Review

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 618-627

  Weber, Rolf H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Data minimization; Internet of things; Privacy challenges; Privacy enhancing technologies; Quality of data; Transparency

Indexed keywords

NETWORK SECURITY; PRIVACY BY DESIGN; TRANSPARENCY;

AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCE; DATA MINIMIZATIONS; INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY; PRIVACY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES; PRIVACY ISSUE; PRIVACY RISKS; PROTECTION OF PRIVACY; QUALITY OF DATA;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84941873705     PISSN: 02673649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2015.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Definition of ITU (2005), available at .
2. R.H.Weber, Internet of things - New security and privacy challenges, CSLR 26 (2010), 23-30
3. R.H.Weber/R.Weber, Internet of Things - Legal Perspectives, Zürich 2010.
4. European Commission, Internet of Things, Reports, January 16, 2013, available at .
5. R.H.Weber, Internet of Things - Governance quo vadis? CLSR 29 (2013), 341, 342/43.
6. Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies, The Internet of Things: Roundtable with FTC Commissioner Brill, 2014, available at .
7. Impinj Inc., RFID Industry Standards, .
8. Radio Frequency Identification Regional Centre WM,The costs of an RFID implementation, available at .
9. EPC Global, Object Naming Service (ONS) Version 1.0.1, at para 4.2, available at .
10. Q. Xiao/T. Gibbons/H. Lebrun, RFID Technology, Security Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures, 366, available at (KAP).
11. Wynzard Group, Using Wynyard Advanced Crime Analytics On Open Source Data, available at .
12. For example, US Energy Information Administration, How many smart meters are installed in the U.S. and who has them?, available at .
13. S. Lueng, 5 Ways the Internet of Things Will Make Marketing Smarter, Salesforce Blog 20. March 2014, available at .
14. B. Fabian/O. Gunther, Distributed ONS and its Impact on Privacy, 1223, 1225, available at .
15. R.H.Weber/A.Willi, IT-Sicherheit und Recht, Zrich 2006, 284.
16. R.H.Weber/A.Willi, IT-Sicherheit und Recht, Zürich 2006, 284. 22 See also E. Grummt/M. Müller, Fine-Grained Access Control for EPC Information Services, in: Floerkemeier/Langheinrich/Fleisch/ Mattern/Sarma, The Internet of Things, Springer, Berlin (2008), at 35-49.
17. Privacy by Design, 7 Foundational Principles ..
18. Draft EU Data Protection Regulation (as of 7.10.2013) and R.H. Weber, Privacy management practices in the proposed EU regulation, International Data Privacy Law, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 4.
19. R.H. Weber/U. Heinrich, Anonymization, London (2012), passim.
20. L. Sweeney, k-anonymity: a model for protection privacy, International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledgebased Systems 10 (2002), 557-570.
21. A. Machanavajjhala/J. Gehrke/D. Kifer, l-Diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, 24-35 (2006).
22. P. Wang/J. Wang, L-diversity Algorithm for Incremental Data Release, Applied Mathematics & Information Services 7 (2013), 20552060.
23. C. Dwork, A Firm Foundation for Private Data Analysis, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 54 No. 1, 8695, available at .
24. ICANN, Beginners Guide to Internet Protocol (IP) Addresses, March 2011, available at .
25. S.Wicker/R.Thomas, A Privacy-Aware Architecture For Demand Response Systems, Cornell University, Proceedings of the 44th Hawaiian Conference on System Science (HICSS-44), Kauai, Hawaii, January 2011, available at .
26. T. Bajarin, The Next Big Thing for Tech: The Internet of Everything, Time 13 January 2014, available at .
27. P. Schwartz/D. Solove, The PII Problem: Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information, NewYork University Law Review, vol. 86, ed. 6, 2011, 1814-1894, 1819.
28. L. J. Sotto, Privacy and Data Security Law Deskbook, Aspen Publishers, New York, 2010, Section 18.02[A].
29. D. Miorandi/S. Sicari/F. De Pellegrini/I. Chlamtac, Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges, Ad Hoc Networks 10 (2012), 1505, available at .
30. S. Machara Marquez/S. Chabridon/C. Taconet (2013) models@ run.time for privacy and quality of context level agreements in the Internet of Things. Technical report, UMR SAMOVAR, Télécom SudParis.
31. Google Inc.,The Google geocoding API, 2013, available at .
32. Y. de Montjoye/C. A. Hidalgo/M.Verleysen/V. D. Blondel, Unique in the crowd: the privacy bounds of human mobility, 2013 Nat Sci Rep 3:1376.
33. S. A. Bagüés/A. Zeidler/C. F. Valdivielso/I. R. Matias, Disappearing for a while-using white lies in pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on privacy in electronic society, ACM 2007, 80-83.
34. M. Basseville/I.V. Nikiforov, Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, vol. 104. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 2007.
35. Mauritius Declaration on the Internet of Things, 36th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, October 2014, 2, available at .
36. Broadcom, Industry Leaders to Establish Open Interconnect Consortium to Advance Interoperability for Internet of Things, Press Release 9 July 2014, available at .
37. Apple Inc., iCloud security and privacy overview, available at .
38. P.Tucker, Has Big Data Made Anonymity Impossible?, MIT Technology Review, 7 May 2013, available at .
39. M. Wohlsen, What Google Really Gets Out of Buying Nest for $3.2 Billion, Wired, 14 January 2014, available at .