Internet of things - Governance quo vadis?

Computer Law and Security Review

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 341-347

  Weber, Rolf H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Competition law; EU policy; International regulators; Particularities of IoT; Regulatory approaches; Substantive governance principles

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION LAW; EU POLICY; PARTICULARITIES OF IOT; REGULATORY APPROACHES; SUBSTANTIVE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

INTERNET;

EID: 84880234291     PISSN: 02673649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2013.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. http://tinvurl.com/v614sor.
2. European Commission (ed. by H. SUNDMAEKER/P. GUILLEMIN/P. FRIESS/S. WOELFFLE? ), Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things, Brussels, March 2010, p. 43
3. G. LEE, The Internet of Things e Concept and Problem Statement, IRTF, available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lee-iot-problem-statement-00.
4. R. H. WEBER/R. WEBER, Internet of Things e Legal Perspectives, Zu rich/Berlin 2010, p. 1 with further references.
5. http://geo.worldbank.org/MKOGR258V0.
6. Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance, June 2005, p. 4, available at http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf.
7. R.H.WEBER, Shaping Internet Governance: Regulatory Challenges, Zurich 2009, pp. 106e148. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
8. European Commission, Report on the Consultation on IoT Governance, Jan. 16, 2013, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/conclusions- internet-things-publicconsultation.
9. G. SANTUCCI, The Internet of Things: The way ahead.
10. A. FURNESS, Foundations for IoT Governance, in I. G. SMITH/O. VERMESAN/P. FRIESS/A. FURNESS (eds.), The Internet of Things. 2012. New Horizons, Halifax 2012, p. 239.
11. B. FABIAN, Secure Name Services for the Internet of Things, Thesis, Berlin 2008, p. 33.
12. WEBER/WEBER, supra note 2, p. 41
13. European Commission, Internet of Things, Factsheet Privacy and Security, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/conclusionsinternet- things-public-consultation.
14. European Commission, Internet of Things, Factsheet Architecture, p. 1, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/conclusions-internet- things-public-consultation.
15. European Commission, Internet of Things, Factsheet Ethics, available at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/conclusions-internet-things-public- consultation, pp. 6, 18.
16. R. H. WEBER/V. MENOUD, The Information Society and the Digital Divide, Legal Strategies to Finance Global Access, Zurich 2008.
17. R. H. WEBER, Corporate social responsibility as new challenge for the IT industry, [2012] 28 Computer Law & Security Review, pp. 634e640.
18. For further details see R. H. WEBER, Governance of the Internet of Things, in: H. CHAOUCHI (ed.), The Internet of Things, Connecting Objects to the Web, London/Hoboken 2010, pp. 223, 230e233.
19. B. BENHAMOU, A European Governance Perspective on the Object Naming Service, 2007, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fpt/ict/docs/chI-Lisbon-20071215- en.pdf.
20. R. H. WEBER. Accountability of the Internet of Things, [2011] 27 Computer Law & Security Review, pp. 133e138
21. A. BUCHANAN/R.O. KEOHANE, The legitimacy of global governance institutions, Ethics and International Affairs 20 (2006), pp. 405e437.
22. D. KENNEDY, Five basic rules for the Internet of Things, EURESCOM mess@ge 2 (2009), http://archive.eurescom.eu/message/messageSep2009/Five-basic-rules- for-the-Internet-of-Things.asp.
23. S. HALLER/S. KARNOUSKOS/CH. SCHROTH, The Internet of Things in an Enterprise Context, in: J. DOMINGUE/D. FENSEL/P. TRAVERSO (eds.), Future Internet e FIS 2008, Berlin 2009, pp. 14e28.
24. R. WISH/D. BAILEY, Competition Law, 7th ed., Oxford University Press 2012, p. 3.
25. A. FATUR, EU-Competition Law and the Information and Communication Technology Network Industries, Oxford/Portland 2012, p. 164.