A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction-comparing implant- and autologous-based breast reconstruction

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 262, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 692-699

  Fischer, John P ^a   Fox, Justin P ^a   Nelson, Jonas A ^a   Kovach, Stephen J ^a   Serletti, Joseph M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Comparative effectiveness; Cost; Mastectomy; Modality; Outcomes; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; AUTOLOGOUS BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECT TO IMPLANT BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; HOSPITAL CHARGE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; TISSUE EXPANDER; TISSUE EXPANSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; FEMALE; HOSPITAL CHARGES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE EXPANSION; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84941760294     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001457     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, et al. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7-12.
2. Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:201e-209e.
3. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15-23.
4. Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Farias-Eisner G, et al. Diminishing relative contraindications for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:363e-369e.
5. Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:686-693; discussion 693-695.
6. Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:49-62.
7. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, et al. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1170-1178.
8. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of longterm complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:832-839.
9. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:825-831.
10. Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA, et al. Comprehensive outcome and cost analysis of free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction: an experience with 1303 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:195-203.
11. Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, et al. Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1461-1478.
12. Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:1153-1160.
13. Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, et al. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:466-475; discussion 476-477.
14. Seidenstuecker K, Munder B, Mahajan AL, et al. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1086-1092.
15. Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, et al. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:1519-1526.
16. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Nelson JA, et al. Propensity-matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of complications and cost: comparing abdominal free flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219: 303-312.
17. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Cleveland E, et al. Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:928-934.
18. Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, et al. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:340-347.
19. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT, et al. Risk analysis and stratification of surgical morbidity after immediate breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:780-787.
20. Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Nelson JA, et al. Breast reconstruction in the morbidly obese patient: assessment of 30-day complications using the 2005 to 2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:750-761.
21. Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, et al. Diminishing relative contraindications for immediate breast reconstruction: amulticenter study. JAm Coll Surg. 2014;219:788-795.
22. Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:320e-326e.
23. Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:937-946.
24. Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, et al. Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:463-470