RunCA: A cellular automata model for simulating surface runoff at different scales

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 529, Issue P3, 2015, Pages 816-829

  Shao, Qi ^a   Weatherley, Dion ^a   Huang, Longbin ^a   Baumgartl, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Infiltration; Model validation; Runoff modeling; Scale

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CELLULAR AUTOMATA; CYTOLOGY; FLOW OF WATER; INFILTRATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CELLULAR AUTOMATA MODELING; MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT; MODEL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; MODEL VALIDATION; RUNOFF MODEL; SCALE; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL LATTICES;

RUNOFF;

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; HYDROGRAPH; INFILTRATION; MODEL VALIDATION; RUNOFF; SOFTWARE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; WATER DEPTH; WATER FLOW;

EID: 84941695820     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abbott M.B., Bathurst J.C., Cunge J.A., O'Connell P.E., Rasmussen J. An introduction to the European Hydrological System - Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, "SHE", 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol. 1986, 87(1-2):61-77.
2. Amin, S., 1982. Modeling of phosphorous transport in surface runoff from agriculture watersheds. PhD Thesis Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
3. Aron G. Adaptation of Horton and SCS infiltration equations to complex storms. J. Irrigation Drain. Eng. 1992, 118(2):275-284.
4. Aston A.R. Rainfall interception by eight small trees. J. Hydrol. 1979, 42(3-4):383-396.
5. Bauer S.W. A modified Horton equation for infiltration during intermittent rainfall. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 1974, 19(2):219-225.
6. Beasley D.B., Huggins L.F. ANSWERS Users Manual 1981, Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, U.S, 53 pp.
7. Beasley D.B., Huggins L.H., Monke E.J. ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 1980, 23:938-944.
8. Bhuyan S.J., Kalita P.K., Janssen K.A., Barnes P.L. Soil loss predictions with three erosion simulation models. Environ. Modell. Software 2002, 17(2):135-144.
9. Borah K.D., Bera M. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of applications. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47(3):789-803.
10. Cervarolo G., Mendicino G., Senatore A. Coupled vegetation and soil moisture dynamics modeling in heterogeneous and sloping terrains. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10(1):206-225.
11. Chaudhry M.H. Open Channel Flow 1993, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Chow V.T., Maidment D.R., Mays L.W. Applied Hydrology 1988, McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. Costa-Cabral M.C., Burges S.J. Digital Elevation Model Networks (DEMON): a model of flow over hillslopes for computation of contributing and dispersal areas. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30(6):1681-1692.
14. Coulthard T.J., Kirkby M.J., Macklin M.G. Modelling geomorphic response to environmental change in an upland catchment. Hydrol. Process. 2000, 14(11-12):2031-2045.
15. De Roo A.P.J., Wesseling C.G., Ritsema C.J. LISEM: a single-event physically based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. I: Theory, input and output. Hydrol. Process. 1996, 10(8):1107-1117.
16. Erskine R.H., Green T.R., Ramirez J.A., MacDonald L.H. Comparison of grid-based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(9):W09416.
17. Fairfield J., Leymarie P. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res. 1991, 27(5):709-717.
18. Favis-Mortlock D. A self-organizing dynamic systems approach to the simulation of rill initiation and development on hillslopes. Comput. Geosci. 1998, 24(4):353-372.
19. Feldman A.D. HEC-1 flood routing package. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, 119-150. Water Resources Publication, Highlands Ranch, Colorado. V.J. Singh (Ed.).
20. Folino G., Mendicino G., Senatore A., Spezzano G., Straface S. A model based on cellular automata for the parallel simulation of 3D unsaturated flow. Parallel Comput. 2006, 32(5-6):357-376.
21. Green W.H., Ampt C.A. Studies on soil physics I. The flow of air and water through soils. J. Agric. Sci. 1911, 5:1-24.
22. Gregorio S.D., Serra R. An empirical method for modelling and simulating some complex macroscopic phenomena by cellular automata. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 1999, 16(2-3):259-271.
23. Haan C.T., Johnson H.P., Brakensiek D.L. Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds 1982, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Michigan.
24. Holtan H.N. A concept of Infiltration Estimates in Watershed Engineering 1961, U.S. Department of Agricultural Service, Washington, DC.
25. Horton R.E. An approach towards a physical interpretation of infiltration capacity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1940, 5:399-417.
26. Huggins, L.F., Monke, E.J., 1966. The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds, Water Resources Research Center, Purdue University.
27. Huggins L.F., Monke E.J. A mathematical model for simulating the hydrologic response of a watershed. Water Resour. Res. 1968, 4(3):529-539.
28. Jorgensen D.W., Gardner T.W. Infiltration capacity of disturbed soils: temporal change and lithologic control. Water Resour. Bull 1987, 23:1161-1172.
29. Knisel, W.G., 1980. CREAMS. A field scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems. United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Research Report, vol. 26.
30. Laflen J.M., Lane L.J., Foster G.R. WEPP: a new generation of erosion prediction technology. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1991, 46(1):34-38.
31. Ma T., Zhou C.-H., Cai Q.-G. Modeling of hillsloperunoff and soil erosion at rainfall events using cellular automata approach. Pedosphere 2009, 19(6):711-718.
32. MacArthur, R., DeVries, J.J., 1993. Introduction and Application of Kinematic Wave Routing Techniques Using HEC-1, Hydrologic Engineering Centre.
33. Mendicino G., Pedace J., Senatore A. Cellular automata based modeling for the assessment of ecohydrological dynamics at the hillslope scale: preliminary results. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2013, 19:311-320.
34. Mendicino G., Senatore A., Spezzano G., Straface S. Three-dimensional unsaturated flow modeling using cellular automata. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(11):W11419.
35. Morgan R.P.C., Quinton J.N., Smith R.E., Govers G., Poesen J.W.A. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): Documentation and User Guide 1998, Cranfield University, Silsoe College.
36. Morgan R.P.C., et al. The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): A dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 1998, 23:527-544.
37. Murray A.B., Paola C. A cellular model of braided rivers. Nature 1994, 371(1):54-57.
38. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models Part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
39. O'Callaghan J.F., Mark D.M. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. 1984, 28(3):323-344.
40. Parsons J.A., Fonstad M.A. A cellular automata model of surface water flow. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21(16):2189-2195.
41. Philip J.R. The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Sci. 1957, 83:345-357.
42. Quinn P., Beven K., Chevallier P., Planchon O. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modelling using digital terrain models. Hydrol. Process. 1991, 5(1):59-79.
43. Ravazzani G., Rametta D., Mancini M. Macroscopic cellular automata for groundwater modelling: a first approach. Environ. Modell. Software 2011, 26(5):634-643.
44. Razavian D. Hydrologic responses of an agricultural watershed to various hydrologic and management conditions. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1990, 26(5):777-785.
45. Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., Yoder, D.C., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Agriculture Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
46. Rinaldi P.R., Dalponte D.D., Vénere M.J., Clausse A. Cellular automata algorithm for simulation of surface flows in large plains. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2007, 15(3):315-327.
47. Ritter J.B. Surface Hydrology of Drainage Basins Disturbed by Surface Mining and Reclamation, Central Pennsylvania 1990, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 182 pp.
48. Ritter J.B. Application of field infiltration data to hydrologic model parameterization: an example from drainage basins disturbed by surface mining. J. Hydrol. 1992, 134(1-4):173-202.
49. Rojas, R., Julien, P., Johnson, B., 2003. Reference Manual for A 2-Dimensional Rainfall-Runoff and Sediment Model, Colorado State University.
50. Schmidt J., Werner M.v., Michael A. Application of the EROSION 3D model to the CATSOP watershed, The Netherlands. CATENA 1999, 37(3-4):449-456.
51. Sichani S.A., Engel B.A. Prediction of runoff and sediment from agricultural watersheds by a mathematical model: II. Mathematical simulation. Iran Agric. Res. 1990, 9:1-16.
52. Singh R., Tiwari K.N., Mal B.C. Hydrological studies for small watershed in India using the ANSWERS model. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318(1-4):184-199.
53. Singh V.P. Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources: Surface-Water Hydrology 1996, John Wiley, New York, 1399 pp.
54. Smith R.E. A kinematic model for surface mine sediment yield. Trans. ASAE 1981, 24:1508-1514.
55. Swensson M.T. Refinements on a GIS-Based, Spatially Distributed Rainfall-Runoff Model for a Small Watershed 2003, University of Pittsburgh, 125 pp.
56. Tarboton D.G. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33(2):309-319.
57. U.S. Department of Agriculture, S.C.S., 1972. Hydrology, SCS National Engineering Handbook. Section 4. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.
58. Vieux B.E. Geographic information systems and non-point source water quality and quantity modelling. Hydrol. Process. 1991, 5(1):101-113.
59. Von Hoyningen-Huene, J., 1981. Die Interzeption des Niederschlags in landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenbeständen. Arbeitsbericht Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau, DVWK, Braunschweig, 63 pp.
60. Von Neumann J. Theory of Self Reproducing Automata 1966, University of Illinois Press Champaign, IL, USA.
61. Walling D.E., He Q., Whelan P.A. Using 137Cs measurements to validate the application of the AGNPS and ANSWERS erosion and sediment yield models in two small Devon catchments. Soil Tillage Res. 2003, 69(1-2):27-43.
62. Wang, S., Roache, P., Schmalz, R., Jia, Y., Smith, P., 2009. Verification and Validation of 3D Free-Surface Flow Models. American Society of Civil Engineers.
63. Wang, S., Wu, W., 2004. River sedimentation and morphology modeling - the state of the art and future development, Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Yichang, China, pp. 71-94.
64. Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning, Agriculture Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
65. Wolfram S. Computation theory of cellular automata. Commun. Math. Phys. 1984, 96(1):15-57.
66. Young R.A., Onstad C.A., Bosch D.D., Anderson W.P. AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds. J. Soil Water Conserv. 1989, 44(2):168-173.