Hydrological studies for small watershed in India using the ANSWERS model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 318, Issue 1-4, 2006, Pages 184-199

  Singh, Ramadhar ^a   Tiwari, K N ^b   Mal, B C ^b  

^a CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

ANSWERS; DEM; Hydrograph; Runoff; Sediment yield; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENTS; STORMS;

ANSWERS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM); SEDIMENT YIELD;

WATERSHEDS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; SEDIMENTS; STORMS; WATERSHEDS;

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; RUNOFF; SEDIMENT YIELD; WATERSHED;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 31044445277     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models Criteria for evaluation of watershed models J. Irr. Drain. Eng. 119 3 1993 429 442
2. D.B. Beasley, and L.F. Huggins ANSWERS User's Manual 1980 Department of Agricultural Engineering, Purdue University West Lafayette, In
3. D.B. Beasley, L.F. Huggins, and E.J. Monke ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning Trans. ASAE 23 4 1980 938 944
4. D.B. Beasley, L.F. Huggins, and E.J. Monke Modeling sediment yield from agricultural watersheds J. Soil Water Conserv. 37 2 1982 113 117
5. R.L. Bingner, C.E. Murphee, and C.K. Mutchler Comparison of sediment yield models on watershed in Mississippi Trans. ASAE 32 2 1989 529 534
6. R.L. Bingner, C.E. Murphee, and C.K. Mutchler Predictive capabilities of erosion models for different storm sizes Trans. ASAE 35 2 1992 505 513
7. A.K. Chakravorty Strategies for watershed management planning using remote sensing techniques Photonirvachak: J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 21 2 1993 87 98
8. W.L. Cowan Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients Agric. Eng. 37 7 1956 473 475
9. A.P.J. De Roo, I. Hazelhoff, and P.A. Burroh Soil erosion modeling using ANSWERS and GIS Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 14 6-7 1989 517 532
10. J. Garbrecht, and L.W. Martz Network and subwatershed parameters extracted from digital elevation models: the Bill Creek experience Water Resour. Bull. AWRA 29 6 1993 909 916
11. C.T. Haan, B. Allred, D.E. Storm, G.J. Sabbagh, and S. Parbhu Statistical procedure for evaluating hydrological/water quality models Trans. ASAE 38 3 1995 725 733
12. Huggins, L.F., Monke, E.J., 1966. The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds. Technical Report No. 1. Water Resour. Res. Center Purdue University. (130 p).
13. D.R. Legates, and G.J. McCabe Jr. Evaluating the use of 'goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation Water Resour. Res. 35 1 1999 233 241
14. J. Martinec, and A. Rango Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrological models Water Resour. Bull., AWRA 25 2 1989 421 432
15. K. Misra Watershed management activities in Damodar Valley Corporation at a glance Soil Conservation Department 1999 Damodar Valley Corporation Hazaribagh, India
16. N. Misra, and T. Satyanarayana A new approach to predict sediment yield from small ungauged watersheds Agric. Eng. Div. J. Inst. Eng. (India) 37 1991 30 36
17. H.J. Montas, and C.A. Madramootoo Using the ANSWERS model to predict runoff and soil loss in South Western Quebec Trans. ASAE 34 4 1991 1751 1762
18. Murthy, B.N., 1980. Sedimentation Studies in Reservoirs, Technical Report No. 20, Research Scheme applied to River Valley Projects. Central Board of Irrigation and Power, New Delhi Vol. 1. 10 p.
19. J.E. Nash, and J.V. Sutcliffe River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-1: A discussion of principles J. Hydrol. 10 3 1970 282 290
20. Park, S.W., Mitchell, J.K., 1983. MODANSW (A Modified ANSWERS) Model Users Guide. College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural Engineering Department, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
21. D. Razavian Hydrologic responses of an agricultural watershed to various hydrologic and management conditions Water Resour. Bull. AWRA 26 5 1990 777 785
22. Rewerts, C.C., Engel, B.A., 1991. ANSWERS on GRASS: Integrating watershed simulation with a GIS. ASAE Paper No. 91-2621,ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan.
23. J.L. Seghal, and I.P. Abrol Soil Degradation in India: Status and Impact 1983 Oxford and IBH Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India p. 80
24. A.N. Strahler Quantitative geomorphology, drainage basin and channel networks V.T. Chow Handbook of Applied Hydrology, Section 4-II 1964 McGraw Hill New York 4 39 (see also pages 4-76)
25. K.N. Tiwari, N. Kannan, R. Singh, and S.K. Ghosh Watershed parameter extraction using GIS and remote sensing for hydrologic modeling ASIAN-PACIFIC Rem. Sens. GIS J. 10 1 1997 43 52
26. C.J. Willmott On the validation of models Phys. Geogr. 2 1981 184 194
27. W.H. Wischmeier, and D.D. Smith Predicting rainfall Erosion losses Agriculture Handbook No. 537 1978 U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington DC
28. R.A. Young, C.A. Onstad, D.D. Bosch, and W.P. Anderson AGNPS: a non-point source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds J. Soil Water Conserv. 44 2 1989 68 73