Remote ischaemic conditioning on recipients of deceased renal transplants, effect on immediate and extended kidney graft function: A multicentre, randomised controlled trial protocol (CONTEXT)

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Krogstrup, Nicoline V ^a,b   Oltean, Mihai ^c   Bibby, Bo M ^d   Nieuwenhuijs Moeke, Gertrude J ^e   Dor, Frank J M F ^f   Birn, Henrik ^a,b   Jespersen, Bente ^a,b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d Department of Biostatistics ^*  (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^f ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEATH; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGAN DONOR; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING; ADOLESCENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DONOR; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; MEDICAL ETHICS; PROCEDURES; REPERFUSION INJURY; THIGH; VASCULARIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ETHICS, MEDICAL; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; REPERFUSION INJURY; THIGH; TISSUE DONORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941671043     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007941     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation 1997;63:968-74.
2. Miglinas M, Supranaviciene L, Mateikaite K, et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and the effects of early function and graft survival. Transplant Proc 2013;45:1363-7.
3. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004;364:1814-27.
4. Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Horsburgh T, et al. The relative influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on renal transplant survival. Transpl Int 1996;9:415-19.
5. Yarlagadda SG, Coca SG, Formica RN Jr, et al. Association between delayed graft function and allograft and patient survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1039-47.
6. Guimaraes-Souza N, Dalboni MA, Canziani ME, et al. Clinical implications of initial renal function after deceased donor transplant. Transplant Proc 2010;42:1084-9.
7. Summers DM, Johnson RJ, Allen J, et al. Analysis of factors that affect outcome after transplantation of kidneys donated after cardiac death in the UK: a cohort study. Lancet 2010;376:1303-11.
8. Snoeijs MG, Winkens B, Heemskerk MB, et al. Kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death: a 25-year experience. Transplantation 2010;90:1106-12.
9. Tojimbara T, Fuchinoue S, Iwadoh K, et al. Improved outcomes of renal transplantation from cardiac death donors: a 30-year single center experience. Am J Transplant 2007;7:609-17.
10. Heusch G, Botker HE, Przyklenk K, et al. Remote Ischemic Conditioning. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:177-95.
11. Candilio L, Malik A, Hausenloy DJ. Protection of organs other than the heart by remote ischemic conditioning. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2013;14:193-205.
12. Shimizu M, Konstantinov IE, Kharbanda RK, et al. Effects of intermittent lower limb ischaemia on coronary blood flow and coronary resistance in pigs. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2007;190:103-9.
13. Konstantinov IE, Li J, Cheung MM, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning of the recipient reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury of the denervated donor heart via a Katp channel-dependent mechanism. Transplantation 2005;79:1691-5.
14. Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2010;375:727-34.
15. Kharbanda RK, Nielsen TT, Redington AN. Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice. Lancet 2009;374:1557-65.
16. Cheung MM, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2277-82.
17. Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, et al. Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2014;35:168-75.
18. Thielmann M, Kottenberg E, Kleinbongard P, et al. Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2013;382:597-604.
19. Zimmerman RF, Ezeanuna PU, Kane JC, et al. Ischemic preconditioning at a remote site prevents acute kidney injury in patients following cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 2011;80:861-7.
20. Ali ZA, Callaghan CJ, Lim E, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2007;116:I98-105.
21. Pedersen KR, Ravn HB, Povlsen JV, et al. Failure of remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury in children undergoing operation for complex congenital heart disease: a randomized single-center study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:576-83.
22. Choi YS, Shim JK, Kim JC, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on renal dysfunction after complex valvular heart surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142:148-54.
23. Yang Y, Lang XB, Zhang P, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2014;64:574-83.
24. Kanoria S, Jalan R, Seifalian AM, et al. Protocols and mechanisms for remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel method for reducing ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 2007;84:445-58.
25. Aydin Z, van Zonneveld AJ, de Fijter JW, et al. New horizons in prevention and treatment of ischaemic injury to kidney transplants. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:342-6.
26. Veighey K, MacAllister R. Clinical applications of remote ischaemic preconditioning in native and transplant acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol 2014. Published Online First: 4 Oct. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00467-014-2965-6
27. Krogstrup NV, Soendergaard P, Secher NG, et al. Improved GFR and renal plasma perfusion following remote ischaemic conditioning in a porcine kidney transplantation model. Transpl Int 2012;25:1002-12.
28. Chen Y, Zheng H, Wang X, et al. Remote ischemic preconditioning fails to improve early renal function of patients undergoing living-donor renal transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. Transplantation 2013;95:e4-6.
29. Wu J, Feng X, Huang H, et al. Remote ischemic conditioning enhanced the early recovery of renal function in recipients after kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res 2014;188:303-8.
30. REPAIR trial. http://repair.lshtm.ac.uk; http://www.isrctn. com/ISRCTN30083294
31. RIPNOD study. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01515072
32. Remote Post-Conditioning (RPC) in renal transplantation. http://www.isrctn. com/ISRCTN66437627
33. Kottenberg E, Thielmann M, Bergmann L, et al. Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol-a clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:30-8.
34. Belhomme D, Peynet J, Louzy M, et al. Evidence for preconditioning by isoflurane in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1999;100:II340-4.
35. Toller WG, Kersten JR, Pagel PS, et al. Sevoflurane reduces myocardial infarct size and decreases the time threshold for ischemic preconditioning in dogs. Anesthesiology 1999;91:1437-46.
36. Vaidya VS, Ferguson MA, Bonventre JV. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;48:463-93.
37. Kusaka M, Iwamatsu F, Kuroyanagi Y, et al. Serum neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin during the early postoperative period predicts the recovery of graft function after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. J Urol 2012;187:2261-7.
38. Yamamoto T, Noiri E, Ono Y, et al. Renal L-type fatty acid-binding protein in acute ischemic injury. J AmSoc Nephrol 2007;18:2894-902.
39. Schmidt IM, Hall IE, Kale S, et al. Chitinase-like protein Brp-39/YKL-40 modulates the renal response to ischemic injury and predicts delayed allograft function. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:309-19.