A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 42, Issue 23, 2015, Pages 9379-9388

  Wang, Liang ^a   Zhang, Zi Xin ^a   Wang, Ying Ming ^a  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic reference point; Emergency decision making; Emergency response; Interval value; Prospect theory; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION THEORY; DISASTERS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EMERGENCY DECISION MAKINGS; EMERGENCY RESPONSE; INTERVAL VALUE; PROSPECT THEORY; REFERENCE POINTS; TOPSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84941659950     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.056     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H., Paraschiv C. Loss aversion under prospect theory:a parameter-free measurement Management Science 53 10 2007 1659 1674
2. Abo-Sinna M.A., Amer A.H. Extensions of TOPSIS for multi-objective large-scale nonlinear programming problems Applied Mathematics and Computation 162 1 2005 243 256
3. Bell D.E. Regret in decision making under uncertainty Operations research 30 5 1982 961 981
4. Bell D.E. Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty Operations Research 33 1 1985 1 27
5. Bleichrodt H., Schmidt U., Zank H. Additive utility in prospect theory Management Science 55 5 2009 863 873
6. Booij A.S., Van de Kuilen G. A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory Journal of Economic Psychology 30 4 2009 651 666
7. Bordley R.F., Kirkwood C.W. Multiattribute preference analysis with performance targets Operations Research 52 6 2004 832 835
8. Chen S.M., Lee L.W. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method Expert systems with applications 37 4 2010 2790 2798
9. Chen T.Y. Interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method with leniency reduction and an experimental analysis Applied Soft Computing 11 8 2011 4591 4606
10. Chen T.Y., Tsao C.Y. The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159 11 2008 1410 1428
11. Chen T.Y. Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: discussions on score functions and weight constraints Expert Systems with Applications 39 2 2012 1848 1861
12. Chen T.Y. The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making Applied Soft Computing 26 2015 57 73
13. Cheng S., Chan C.W., Huang G.H. An integrated multi-criteria decision analysis and inexact mixed integer linear programming approach for solid waste management Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 16 5 2003 543 554
14. Chu T.C. Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions International journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems 10 06 2002 687 701
15. Chu T.C. Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 20 11 2002 859 864
16. Chu T.C., Lin Y.C. A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 21 4 2003 284 290
17. Chu T.C., Lin Y.C. An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model Expert Systems with Applications 36 8 2009 10870 10876
18. De Maio C., Fenza G., Gaeta M. A knowledge-based framework for emergency DSS Knowledge-Based Systems 24 8 2011 1372 1379
19. Deepa J., and Sanjay K. Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making European Journal of Operational Research, Available online 2 July 2015, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.047
20. Dymova L., Sevastjanov P., Tikhonenko A. An approach to generalization of fuzzy TOPSIS method. Information Sciences 238 2013 149 162
21. Dymova L., Sevastjanov P., Tikhonenko A. A direct interval extension of TOPSIS method Expert Systems with Applications 40 12 2013 4841 4847
22. Dymova L., Sevastjanov P., Tikhonenko A. An interval type-2 fuzzy extension of the TOPSIS method using alpha cuts Knowledge-Based Systems 83 2015 116 127
23. Ergu D., Kou G., Shi Y. Analytic network process in risk assessment and decision analysis Computers & Operations Research 42 2011 58 74
24. Ergu D., Zhang M., Guo Z., Yang X. Consistency simulation and optimization for HPIBM model in emergency decision making Procedia Computer Science 31 2014 558 566
25. Fan Z.P., Liu Y., Shen R.J. Risk decision analysis method for emergency response based on prospect theory Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 32 5 2012 977 984
26. Fan Z.P., Zhang X., Chen F.D. Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: a method based on prospect theory Computers & Industrial Engineering 65 2 2013 341 350
27. Fu P.P., Wu C., Tang J. Unconventional emergency management based on intelligent group decision-making methodology Advances in Information Sciences & Service Sciences 4 7 2012 208 216
28. Hämäläinen R.P., Lindstedt M.R.K., Sinkko K. Multiattribute risk analysis in nuclear emergency management Risk Analysis 20 4 2000 455 468
29. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications 1981 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
30. Ju Y., Wang A., You T. Emergency alternative evaluation and selection based on ANP, DEMATEL, and TL-TOPSIS Natural Hazards 75 2 2015 347 379
31. Jahanshahloo G.R., Lotfi F.H., Davoodi A.R. Extension of TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data: interval efficiency Mathematical and Computer Modelling 49 5 2009 1137 1142
32. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 2 1979 263 291
33. Körte J. Risk-based emergency decision support Reliability Engineering & System Safety 82 3 2003 235 246
34. Krohling R.A., Campanharo V.C. Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea Expert Systems with Applications 38 4 2011 4190 4197
35. Lai Y.J., Liu T.Y., Hwang C.L. Topsis for MODM European Journal of Operational Research 76 3 1994 486 500
36. Levy J.K., Taji K. Group decision support for hazards planning and emergency management: a group analytic network process (GANP) approach Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46 7 2007 906 917
37. Liu Y., Fan Z.P., Yuan Y. A FTA-based method for risk decision-making in emergency response Computers & Operations Research 42 2014 49 57
38. Liu Y., Fan Z.P., Zhang Y. Risk decision analysis in emergency response: a method based on cumulative prospect theory Computers & Operations Research 42 2014 75 82
39. Liu Y., Fan Z.P., Yuan Y. Multiple attributes risk decision making method for emergency response Operations Research and Management Science 01 2013 23 28
40. Loomes G., Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty The Economic Journal 92 1982 805 824
41. Loomes G., Sugden R. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty The Review of Economic Studies 53 2 1986 271 282
42. Ma J., Fan Z.P., Huang L.H. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights European Journal of Operational Research 112 2 1999 397 404
43. Mahdevari S., Shahriar K., Esfahanipour A. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS Science of the Total Environment 488 2014 85 99
44. Mendonça D., Rush R., Wallace W.A. Timely knowledge elicitation from geographically separate, mobile experts during emergency response Safety Science 35 1 2000 193 208
45. Millar H., Joseph A., Mobolurin A. Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning European Journal of Operational Research 141 3 2002 679 688
46. Mokhtarian M.N., Sadi-Nezhad S., Makui A. A new flexible and reliable IVF-TOPSIS method based on uncertainty risk reduction in decision making process Applied Soft Computing 23 2014 509 520
47. Mo S., Duan H., Shen B., Wang D. Interval Two-stage stochastic integer programming for urban water resource management under uncertainty Journal of Coastal Research 73 sp1 2015 160 165
48. Nwogugu M. A further critique of cumulative prospect theory and related approaches Applied mathematics and computation 179 2 2006 451 465
49. Rainabralimam B.V., Sreenivasulu B., Mallikaijunan M.M. Model on-site emergency plan Case study: Toxic gas release from an ammonia storage terminal. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 9 4 1996 259 265
50. Rashid T., Beg I., Husnine S.M. Robot selection by using generalized interval-valued fuzzy numbers with TOPSIS Applied Soft Computing 21 2014 462 468
51. Schmidt U., Starmer C., Sugden R. Third-generation prospect theory Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36 3 2008 203 223
52. Schmidt U., Zank H. Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory Management Science 54 1 2008 208 216
53. Schmidt U., Zank H. A genuine foundation for prospect theory Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45 2 2012 97 113
54. Sun B., Ma W., Zhao H. A fuzzy rough set approach to emergency material demand prediction over two universes Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 10 2013 7062 7070
55. Tsaur R.C. Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method Applied Mathematics and Computation 218 8 2011 4295 4304
56. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice Science 211 4481 1981 453 458
57. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 4 1991 1039 1061
58. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 4 1992 297 323
59. Wakker P.P. Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity 2010 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
60. Wang L., Wang Y.M. Study on the emergency decision method of dynamic reference point based on prospect theory Chinese Journal of Management Science S1 2013 132 140
61. Wang Y.M., Elhag T. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment Expert systems with applications 31 2 2006 309 319
62. Wu G., Markle A.B. An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory Management Science 54 7 2008 1322 1335
63. Wu B., Zhao L.D. Knowledge model of emergency decision-making based on knowledge supply and demand E-business Technology and Strategy 113 2010 305 317
64. Xiong W., Li J.L. An emergency local group decision-making model based on variable precision rough set, management and service science 2011 International Conference on. IEEE 2011 1 4
65. Xu X., Liang D., Chen X., Zhou Y. A risk elimination coordination method for large group decision-making in natural disaster emergencies Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 21 5 2015 1314 1325
66. Yang J., Xu C. Emergency decision engineering model based on sequential games Systems Engineering Procedia 5 2012 276 282
67. Ye F. An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection Expert Systems with Applications 37 10 2010 7050 7055
68. Yu L., Lai K.K. A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support Decision Support Systems 51 2 2011 307 315
69. Yue Z. TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting Information Sciences 277 2014 141 153
70. Zhao J., Jin T., Shen H. A case-based evolutionary group decision support method for emergency response Intelligence and Security Informatics 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 94 104
71. Zhou C., Wang H., Zhuo H.H. A multi-agent coordinated planning approach for deadline required emergency response tasks IET Control Theory & Applications 9 3 2014 447 455