Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: A method based on prospect theory

Computers and Industrial Engineering

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 341-350

  Fan, Zhi Ping ^a   Zhang, Xiao ^a,b   Chen, Fa Dong ^c   Liu, Yang ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XIDIAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aspiration level; Gain; Loss; Multiple attribute decision making (MADM); Prospect theory; Ranking

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; LOSSES; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ASPIRATION-LEVEL; GAIN; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; PROSPECT THEORY; RANKING;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 84893648815     PISSN: 03608352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & Paraschiv, C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science, 53 (10), 1659-1674. (Pubitemid 351159588)
2. Besharati, B., Azarm, S., & Kannan, P. K. (2006). A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach. Decision Support Systems, 42 (1), 333-350. (Pubitemid 44278282)
3. Bleichrodt, H., Schmidt, U., & Zank, H. (2009). Additive utility in prospect theory. Management Science, 55 (5), 863-873.
4. Bordley, R. F., & Kirkwood, C. W. (2004). Multiattribute preference analysis with performance targets. Operations Research, 52 (6), 823-835. (Pubitemid 40122345)
5. Camerer, C. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics, 1 (2), 163-183.
6. Fan, Z. P., & Liu, Y. (2010). An approach to solve group-decision-making problems with ordinal interval numbers. IEEE transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part B: Cybernetics, 40 (5), 1413-1423.
7. Gomes, L. F. A M., & Lima, M. M. P. P. (1992). TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16 (4), 113-127.
8. Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Rangel, L. A. D. (2009). An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (1), 204-211.
9. He, X. D., & Zhou, X. Y. (2011). Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Management Science, 57 (2), 315-331.
10. Hwang, C. L, & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.
11. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-292.
12. Kulak, O. (2005). A decision support system for fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling equipments. Expert Systems with Applications, 29 (2), 310-319. (Pubitemid 40970641)
13. Kulak, O., & Kahraman, C. (2005). Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 95 (3), 415-424. (Pubitemid 40114615)
14. Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2009). Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). Omega, 37 (5), 961-971.
15. Li, D. F., and Huang., Z. G., & Chen, G. H. (2010). A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59 (4), 561-572.
16. Liao, C. N. (2011). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and multi-segment goal programming applied to new product segmented under price strategy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61 (3), 831-841.
17. Liu, S. T., & Kao, C. (2009). Matrix games with interval data. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56 (4), 1697-1700.
18. Lotfi, V., & Stewart, T. J. (1992). An aspiration-level interactive model for multiple criteria decision making. Computers & Operation Research, 19 (7), 671-687.
19. Ma, J., and Fan., Z. P., & Huang, L. H. (1999). A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 112 (2), 397-404.
20. Matos, M. A. (1999). A fuzzy filtering method applied to power distribution planning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 102 (1), 53-58. (Pubitemid 129496769)
21. Nowak, M. (2004). Interactive approach in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance. Control and Cybernetics, 33, 463-473.
22. Nowak, M. (2006). INSDECM-an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 175 (3), 1413-1430. (Pubitemid 44436730)
23. Nowak, M. (2007). Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 177 (3), 1626-1640. (Pubitemid 44709445)
24. Prato, T. (1999). Multiple attribute decision analysis for ecosystem management. Ecological Economics, 30 (2), 207-222. (Pubitemid 29449766)
25. Salminen, P., & Wallenius, J. (1993). Testing prospect theory in a deterministic multiple criteria decision-making environment. Decision Sciences, 24 (2), 279-294.
26. Schmidt, U., Starmer, C, & Sugden, R. (2008). Third generation prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36 (3), 203-223.
27. Sun, M., & Steuer, R E. (1996). InterQuad: An interactive quad tree based procedure for solving the discrete alternative multiple criteria problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 89 (3), 462-472. (Pubitemid 126386779)
28. Tversky, A, & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. (Pubitemid 11145313)
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (4), 1039-1061.
30. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), 297-323.
31. Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Wan, S. P., & Li, D. F. (2013). Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. OMEGA, 41 (6), 925-940.
33. Wang, J. G., & Zionts, S. (2006). The aspiration level interactive method (AIM) reconsidered: Robustness of solutions. European Journal of Operational Research, 175 (2), 948-958. (Pubitemid 44345105)
34. Wu, G., & Markle, A. B. (2008). An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory. Management Science, 54 (7), 1322-1335.
35. Xu, H. L., Zhou, J., & Xu, W. (2011). A decision-making rule for modeling travelers' route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory. Transportation Research Parte, 19 (2),: 218-228.
36. Yager, R. R, Detyniecki, M., & Meunier, B. B. (2001). A context-dependent method for ordering fuzzy numbers using probabilities. Information Sciences, 138 (1-4), 237-255. (Pubitemid 32698498)
37. Yan, H. B., and Huynh., V. N., Murai, T., & Nakamori, Y. (2008). Kansei evaluation based on prioritized multi-attribute fuzzy target-oriented decision analysis. Information Sciences, 178 (21), 4080-4093.
38. Zank, H. (2001). Cumulative prospect theory for parametric and multiattribute utilities. Mathematics of Operations Research, 26 (1), 67-81. (Pubitemid 34046263)
39. Zaras, K. (2004). Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for determinist, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 159 (1), 196-206.