Perinatal consequences of a category 1 caesarean section at term

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Grace, Leah ^a   Greer, Ristan M ^b   Kumar, Sailesh ^a,b  

^a MATER MOTHERS HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDOSIS; ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; ASIAN; AUSTRALIA; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CAUCASIAN; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFANTILE SPASM; LIFE THREAT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN DISEASE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; TERM BIRTH; TREATMENT INDICATION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TERTIARY CARE CENTER;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; AUSTRALIA; BIRTH WEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TERM BIRTH; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS;

EID: 84941588360     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007248     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, et al. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 2000;283:2411-16.
2. Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, et al. Breastfeeding after caesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95:1113-35.
3. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat caesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1226-32.
4. Azam S, Khanam A, Tirlapur S, et al. Planned caesarean section or trial of vaginal delivery? A meta-analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014;26:461-8.
5. Visser GH. Women are designed to deliver vaginally and not by caesarean section: an obstetrician's view. Neonatology 2014;107:8-13.
6. DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, et al. Caesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 1996;15:303-14.
7. Silver RM. Implications of the first caesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent caesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol 2012;36:315-23.
8. Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in caesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief March 2010;(35):1-8.
9. De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, et al. Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term caesarean delivery. Pediatrics 2009;123:e1064-71.
10. Essex HN, Green J, Baston H, et al. Which women are at an increased risk of a caesarean section or an instrumental vaginal birth in the UK: an exploration within the Millennium Cohort Study. BJOG 2013;120:732-42; discussion 42-3.
11. Thomas J, Paranjothy S. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report: Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. RCOG Press, 2001.
12. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 2000;93:346-50.
13. Zhang Q, Dunn C, Sia J, et al. Category one caesarean section: a team-based approach. Trends Anaes Crit Care 2014 (4):97-101.
14. Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, et al. Caesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:896-902.
15. NICE. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth, 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg55
16. Gilbert WM, Danielsen B. Pregnancy outcomes associated with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1596-9; discussion 99-601.
17. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 106-Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192-202.
18. RANZCOG. Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance. Clinical Guideline. 3rd edn. 2014. https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/intrapartum-fetal-surveillanceclinical-guidelines.html
19. Byford S, Weaver E, Anstey C. Has the incidence of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in Queensland been reduced with improved education in fetal surveillance monitoring? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;54:348-53.
20. Tolcher MC, Johnson RL, El-Nashar SA, et al. Decision-to-incision time and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:536-48.
21. Schifrin BS, Cohen WR. The effect of malpractice claims on the use of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;27:269-83.
22. Berglund S, Norman M. Neonatal resuscitation assessment: documentation and early paging must be improved! Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012;97:F204-8.
23. Cowan F, Rutherford M, Groenendaal F, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003;361:736-42.
24. Murray DM, O'Riordan MN, Horgan R, et al. Fetal heart rate patterns in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: relationship with early cerebral activity and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Perinatol 2009;26:605-12.
25. Jonsson M, Agren J, Norden-Lindeberg S, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy and the association to asphyxia in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:667.e1-8.
26. Berglund S, Grunewald C, Pettersson H, et al. Severe asphyxia due to delivery-related malpractice in Sweden 1990-2005. BJOG 2008;115:316-23.
27. Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, et al. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:124 e1-6.
28. Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, et al. Umbilical venous flow rate in term fetuses: can variations in flow predict intrapartum compromise? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;210:61 e1-8.
29. Walker KF, Cohen AL, Walker SH, et al. The dangers of the day of birth. BJOG 2014;121:714-18.
30. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, et al. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet 2011;377:1448-63.
31. Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Caesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:276-87.
32. Stavrou EP, Ford JB, Shand AW, et al. Epidemiology and trends for caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011;11:8.
33. Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Changes in caesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States, 1996-2011. NCHS Data Brief June 2013;(124):1-8.
34. Li Z, Zeki R, Hilder L, et al. Australia's mothers and babies 2010 perinatal statistics series No. 27. Category No. PER 57. AIHW National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, 2012.
35. Wiegerinck MM, Danhof NA, Van Kaam AH, et al. The validity of the variable "NICU admission" as an outcome measure for neonatal morbidity: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014;93:603-9.