Long-term safety and effectiveness of style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implants

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 430-436

  Hedén, Per ^a   Bronz, Giorgio ^b   Elberg, Jens Jorgen ^c   Deraemaecker, Rika ^d   Murphy, Diane K ^e   Slicton, Araceli ^e   Brenner, R James ^f   Svarvar, Catarina ^g   Van Tetering, Joost ^h   Van Der Weij, Leo Peter ⁱ  

^a Akademikliniken   (Sweden)

^b Bronz Clinic   (Switzerland)

^c Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^d JULES BORDET INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

^e ALLERGAN INC   (United States)

^f Bay Imaging Consultants   (United States)

^g HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^h Infection and Immunology   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Kliniek Klein Rosendael   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Quality of life; Rupture; Safety; Silicone breast implants

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST IMPLANT CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LACTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SAFETY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION;

EID: 67349087260     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9360-x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. P Hedén B Boné DK Murphy A Slicton PS Walker 2006 Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation Plast Reconstr Surg 118 1281 1287 (Pubitemid 44610375)
2. AM Danino P Basmacioglu S Saito F Rocher C Blanchet-Bardon M Revol J Servant 2001 Comparison of the capsular response to the Biocell RTV and Mentor 1600 Siltex breast implant surface texturing: a scanning electron microscopic study Plast Reconstr Surg 108 2047 2052 (Pubitemid 34000849)
3. LR Hölmich JP Fryzek K Kjøller VB Breiting A Jørgensen C Krag JK [tmp] McLaughlin 2005 The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging Ann Plast Surg 54 583 589 (Pubitemid 40726819)
4. CU Herborn B Marincek D Erfmann C Meuli-Simmen V Wedler B Bode-Lesniewska RA Kubik-Huch 2002 Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery: MR imaging of implant rupture and malignancy Eur Radiol 12 2198 2206 (Pubitemid 36940313)
5. BP Bengtson BW Van Natta DK Murphy A Slicton GP Maxwell 2007 Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years Plast Reconstr Surg 120 Suppl 1 40S 48S (Pubitemid 350306657)
6. (2008) Natrelle silicone-filled breast implants (package insert, Canada). Allergan Inc., Santa Barbara, CA
7. MH Brown R Shenker SA Silver 2005 Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 116 768 779 (Pubitemid 41279381)
8. RM Graf A Bernardes R Rippel LR Araujo RC Damasio A Auersvald 2003 Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure Plast Reconstr Surg 111 904 908 (Pubitemid 36182351)
9. J Serra-Renom MF Garrido T Yoon 2005 Augmentation mammaplasty with anatomic soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance Plast Reconstr Surg 116 640 645 (Pubitemid 41077227)
10. G Bronz 2002 A comparison of naturally shaped and round implants Aesthet Surg J 22 238 246
11. TF Cash LA Duel LL Perkins 2002 Women's psychosocial outcomes of breast augmentation with silicone gel-filled implants: a 2-year prospective study Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2112 2121 (Pubitemid 34492447)
12. J Banbury R Yetman A Lucas 2004 Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image Plast Reconstr Surg 113 701 707 (Pubitemid 39201947)