The effectiveness of providing peer benchmarked feedback to hip replacement surgeons based on patientreported outcome measures-results from the PROFILE (Patient-Reported Outcomes: Feedback Interpretation and Learning Experiment) trial: A cluster randomised controlled study

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Boyce, Maria B ^a   Browne, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME VARIABLE; OXFORD HIP SCORE; RESPONSIBILITY; SECONDARY HEALTH CARE; SURGEON; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BENCHMARKING; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EDUCATION; HIP; HIP REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PEER PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BENCHMARKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER INFLUENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84941566046     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008325     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2013;22:2265-78.
2. Devlin N, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMs: putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: King's Fund, 2010.
3. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 2013;346:f167.
4. Health Services Advisory Group. Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. USA, 2011 [17/11/11]. http://www.hosonline.org/
5. Nelson EC. Using patient-reported information to improve health outcomes and health care value: case studies from Dartmouth, Karolinska and Group Health. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 2012.
6. Callaly T, Hyland M, Coombs T, et al. Routine outcome measurement in public mental health: results of a clinician survey. Aust Health Rev 2006;30:164-73.
7. Meehan T, McCombes S, Hatzipetrou L, et al. Introduction of routine outcome measures: staff reactions and issues for consideration. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2006;13:581-7.
8. Pirkis J, Burgess P, Coombs T, et al. Routine measurement of outcomes in Australia's public sector mental health services. Aust New Zealand Health Policy 2005;2:8.
9. Canadian Institute of Public Health. Health outcomes of care: an idea whose time has come. Ottawa, Ontario: CIHI, 2012.
10. Delnoij DM, Westert GP. Assessing the validity of quality indicators: keep the context in mind! Eur J Public Health 2012;22:452-3.
11. Browne J, Jamieson L, Lewsey J, et al. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Elective Surgery-Report to the Department of Health. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2007.
12. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care 2003;41(1 Suppl):I30-8.
13. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Patient reported outcome measures. UK, 2013. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/proms
14. Weingarten SR, Kim CS, Stone EG, et al. Can peer-comparison feedback improve patient functional status? Am J Manag Care 2000;6:35-9.
15. Varagunam M, Hutchings A, Neuburger J, et al. Impact on hospital performance of introducing routine patient reported outcome measures in surgery. J Health Serv Res Policy 2014;19:77-84.
16. Moriarty JP, Smallman C. En route to a theory of benchmarking. Benchmarking 2009;16:484-503.
17. Gawande A, ed. Better: a surgeon's notes on performance. London: Profile Books Ltd, 2007.
18. Boyce MB, Browne JP, Greenhalgh J. Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study. Implement Sci 2014;9:84.
19. MRC. Cluster randomised trials: methodological and ethical considerations. Medical Research Counil, 2002.
20. Hildon Z, Neuburger J, Allwood D, et al. Clinicians' and patients' views of metrics of change derived from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for comparing providers' performance of surgery. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:171.
21. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Churchman D, et al. User manual for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Information on development and use of the OHS. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2010.
22. Department of Health. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in England. The case-mix adjustment methodology. England: Department of Health, 11 April 2012.
23. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, et al. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:843-7.
24. Cheung K, Oemar M, Oppe M, et al. User Guide: basic information on how to use EQ5D. EuroQol Group, 2009.
25. Beard D, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:73-9.
26. Altman DG. Randomisation. BMJ 1991;302:1481-2.
27. Varagunam M, Hutchings A, Black N. Relationship between patient-reported outcomes of elective surgery and hospital and consultant volume. Med Care 2015;53:310-16.
28. Lingard L, ed. Power of the NHS patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme to improve quality. Edinburgh: ISqua, 2013.
29. Jahagirdar D, Kroll T, Ritchie K, et al. Using patient reported outcome measures in health services: a qualitative study on including people with low literacy skills and learning disabilities. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:431.
30. McGrail K, Bryan S, Davis J. Let's all go to the PROM: the case for routine patient-reported outcome measurement in Canadian healthcare. Healthc Pap 2011;11:8-18; discussion 55-8.
31. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(6):CD000259.
32. Greenhalgh J, Pawson R, Wright J, et al. Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PROMs data to improve patient care. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005601.
33. Appleby J, Devlin N. Measuring success in the NHS: using patient-assessed health outcomes to manage the performance of healthcare providers. London: Dr Foster Ethics Committee and funded by Dr Foster Limited, 2004.
34. Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, et al. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy 2013;110:115-30.