Prediction of radial artery diameter in candidates for transradial coronary angiography: Is occupation a factor?

Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 450-456

  Aykan, Ahmet Çaʇri ^a   Hatem, Engin ^a   Kalaycioʇlu, Ezgi ^a   Aykan, Duygun Altintaş ^b   Gökdeniz, Tayyar ^a   Arslan, Ahmet Oʇuz ^a   Çelik, Şükrü ^a  

^a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery   (Turkey)

^b KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Balloon; Coronary angiography methods; Coronary methods; Heart catheterization methods; Radial artery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; B MODE ULTRASONOGRAPHY; B SCAN; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCUPATION; PREDICTION; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY DIAMETER; TRANSRADIAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; WRIST; AGED; ECHOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONS; RADIAL ARTERY; RISK FACTORS; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE;

EID: 84941559798     PISSN: 10165169     EISSN: 13084488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2015.75002     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. ∗∗ and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 2013; 8:1242-51.
2. Taçoy G., Timurkaynak T. Transradial approach in diagnostic and therapeutic interventional coronary artery procedures. [Article in Turkish] Turk Kardiyol Dem Ars 2010; 38:50-6.
3. Vefali V, Arslan U. Our experience with transradial approach for coronary angiography. Turk Kardiyol Dem Ars 2008; 36:163-7.
4. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989; 16:3-7.
5. Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Allain A., Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: The CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 52:181-7.
6. Aykan AC, Gul I, Gokdeniz T., Kalaycioglu E, Hatem E, Altintas Aykan D, et al. Assessment of vascular dysfunction after transradial coronary angiography: is single catheter better? Eur Heart J 2014; 35(Suppl.):131. [Abstract]
7. Aykan AC, Gokdeniz T, Gul I., Kalaycioglu E, Cetin M, Hatem E., et al. Comparison of low dose versus standard dose heparin for radial approach in elective coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2014; 35(Suppl.):860. [Abstract]
8. Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, Asif N., Almoghairi AM, Choudhury A, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the Good Radial Artery Size Prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol 2014; 30:211-6.
9. Buturak A, Gorgulu S, Norgaz T., Voyvoda N, Sahingoz Y, Degirmencioglu A., et al. The long-term incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure. Cardiol J 2014; 21:350-6.
10. Okuyan H, Açikgoz SK, Tacoy G., Kocaman SA, Abaci A. Effect of transradial coronary angiography procedure on vascular diameter and vasodilator functions in the access site. Angiology 2013; 64:515-21.
11. Aktürk E., Kurtoʇlu E, Ermiş N, Açikgöz N, Yaʇmur J, Altuntaş MS, et al. Comparision of pain levels of transradial versus transfemoral coronary catheterization: a prospective and randomized study. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2014; 14:140-6.
12. Norgaz T, Gorgulu S, Dagdelen S. A randomized study comparing the effectiveness of right and left radial approach for coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80:260-4.