LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1427-1434

  Katić, Darko ^a   Julliard, Chantal ^a   Wekerle, Anna Laura ^a   Kenngott, Hannes ^a   Müller Stich, Beat Peter ^a   Dillmann, Rüdiger ^a   Speidel, Stefanie ^a   Jannin, Pierre ^a   Gibaud, Bernard ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Context awareness; Knowledge sharing; Ontology; Situation interpretation

Indexed keywords

ADRENALECTOMY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; KNOWLEDGE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; ONTOLOGY; ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; PANCREAS SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; STANDARD; TIME; WORKFLOW; ANATOMIC MODEL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PANCREAS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGERY;

ADRENALECTOMY; ALGORITHMS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PANCREAS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84941414432     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1222-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Woods DD, Patterson ES, Roth EM (2002) Can we ever escape from data overload? A cognitive systems diagnosis. Cognit Technol Work 4(1):22–36
2. Joyce JP, Lapinski GW (1983) A history and overview of the safety parameter display system concept. IEEE Nucl Sci 30:744–749
3. Kranzfelder M, Staub C, Fiolka A, Schneider A, Gillen S, Wilhelm D, Friess H, Knoll A, Feussner H (2013) Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations. Surg Endosc 27(5):1681–1688
4. Lemke HU, Ratib OM, Horii SC (2005) Workflow in the operating room: a summary review of the arrowhead 2004 seminar on imaging and informatics. Int Congr Ser 1281:862–867
5. Cleary K, Chung H, Mun S (2005) Or 2020: the operating room of the future. In: CARS 2005: computer assisted radiology and surgery, Proceedings of the 19th international congress and exhibition, International congress series, vol 1281, pp 832–838
6. Lalys F, Jannin P (2013) Surgical process modelling: a review. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(3):495–511. doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0940-5
7. Blum T, Padoy N, Feussner H, Navab N (2008) Workflow mining for visualization and analysis of surgeries. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(5):379–386
8. Bouarfa L, Jonker PP, Dankelman J (2010) Discovery of high-level tasks in the operating room. J Biomed Inform 44(3):455–462
9. Ahmadi A, Sielhorst T, Stauder R, Horn M, Feussner H, Navab N (2007) Recovery of surgical workflow without explicit models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(Pt 1):420–428
10. Stauder R, Okur A, Peter L, Schneider A, Kranzfelder M, Feussner H, Navab N (2014) In: Random forests for phase detection in surgical workflow analysis the 5th international conference on information processing in computer-assisted interventions (IPCAI)
11. Reiley C, Lin H, Varadarajan B, Vagolgyi B, Khudanpur S, Yuh D, Hager G (2008) Automatic recognition of surgical motions using statistical modeling for capturing variability. Stud Health Technol Inform 132:396–401
12. Lalys F, Riffaud L, Morandi X, Jannin P (2011) Surgical phases detection from microscope videos by combining SVM and HMM. Med Comput Vis Recognit Tech Appl Med Imaging
13. Padoy N, Blum T, Ahmadi SA, Feussner H, Berger MO, Navab N (2010) Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow. Med Image Anal 16(3):632–641
14. Blum T, Feussner H, Navab N (2010) Modeling and segmentation of surgical workflow from laparoscopic video. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv
15. Suzuki T, Sakurai Y, Yoshimitsu K, Nambu K, Muragaki Y, Iseki H (2010) Intraoperative multichannel audio-visual information recording and automatic surgical phase and incident detection. In: 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, 1190–1193
16. Neumuth T, Jannin P, Schlomberg J, Meixensberger J, Wiedemann P, Burgert O (2011) Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(1):59–71
17. Burgert O, Neumuth T, Lempp F, Mudunuri R, Meixensberger J, Strauss G, Dietz A, Jannin P, Lemke HU (2006) Linking top-level ontologies and surgical workflows. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(1):437–438
18. Jannin P, Morandi X (2007) Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery. Neuroimage 37(3):783–791
19. Neumuth T, Kaschek B, Neumuth D, Ceschia M, Meixensberger J, Strauss G, Burgert O (2010) An observation support system with an adaptive ontology-driven user interface for the modeling of complex behaviors during surgical interventions. Behav Res Methods 42(4):1049–1058
20. Neumuth D, Loebe F, Herre H, Neumuth T (2011) Modeling surgical processes: a four-level translational approach. Artif Intell Med 51(3):147–161
21. Lalys F, Bouget B, Riffaud R, Jannin P (2013) Automatic knowledge-based recognition of low-level tasks in ophthalmological procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg CARS 8:39–49
22. Oropesa I, Snchez-Gonzlez P, Lamata P, Chmarra MK, Pagador JB, Snchez-Margallo JA, Snchez-Margallo FM, Gmez EJ (2011) Methods and tools for objective assessment of psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 171(1):81–95
23. Blake C, Keogh E, Merz CJ (1998) UCI repository of machine learning databases, http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.html
24. Katic Katic, Wekerle AL, Grtner F, Kenngott HG, Müller-Stich BP, Dillmann R, Speidel S (2014) Knowledge-driven formalization of laparoscopic surgeries for rule-based intraoperative context-aware assistance. Information processing in computer-assisted interventions, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8498, pp 158–167
25. Gibaud B, Penet C, Pierre J (2014) OntoSPM: a core ontology of surgical procedure models, SURGETICA
26. Grenon P, Smith B (2004) SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spat Cognit Compuat 1(4):69–103
27. Rosse C, Mejino JLV (2007) The foundational model of anatomy ontology. Anat Ontol Bioinf Princ Pract 6:59–117
28. Information Artifact Ontology. https://code.google.com/p/information-artifact-ontology
29. Unit Ontology. https://code.google.com/p/unit-ontology/
30. Speidel S, Benzko J, Sudra G, Azad P, Müller-Stich BP, Gutt C, Dillmann R (2009) Automatic classification of minimally invasive instruments based on endoscopic image sequences. SPIE Med Imaging 7261
31. Neumuth T, Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Lemke HU, Burgert O (2006) Acquisition of process descriptions from surgical interventions. DEXA2006
32. Xiang Z, Courtot M, Brinkman RR, Ruttenberg A, He Y (2010) OntoFox: web-based support for ontology reuse. BMC Res Notes 3:175
33. O’Connor MJ, Das A (2009) SQWRL: a query language for OWL OWL: experiences and directions (OWLED). In: 6th International Workshop
34. Shearer R, Motik B, Horrocks I (2008) HermiT: a highly-efficient OWL reasoner. In: 5th International workshop on OWL: experiences and directions
35. O’Connor MJ, Knublauch H, Tu SW, Grossof B, Dean M, Grosso WE, Musen MA (2005) Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL. In: 4th International semantic web conference (ISWC) LNCS 3729:974–986
36. Horridge M, Bechhofer S (2011) The OWL API: a Java API for OWL ontologies. Semanti Web J Spec Issue Semant Web Tools Syst 2(1):11–21
37. http://protege.stanford.edu/
38. Neumuth T, Jannin P, Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Burgert O (2009) Validation of knowledge acquisition for surgical process models. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(1):72–80. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2748 PMCID: PMC2605601
39. Cornet R, de Keizer N (2008) Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8(Suppl 1):S2