Rejoinder: Moving the Management Field Forward

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 620-628

  Walsh, Isabelle ^a   Holton, Judith A ^b   Bailyn, Lotte ^c   Fernandez, Walter ^d   Levina, Natalia ^e   Glaser, Barney ^f  

^a NEOMA BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^b MOUNT ALLISON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Grounded Theory Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

grounded theory; philosophy of science; qualitative research; research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941369211     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428115589189     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. M.N.Amsteus (2014). The validity of divergent grounded theory method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 71–87.
2. A.BryantK.Charmaz (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London, UK: Sage.
3. A.Bryman (1998). Quantitative and qualitative research strategies in knowing the social world. In T.MayM.Williams (Eds.), Knowing the social world (pp. 138–157). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
4. K.Charmaz (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K.DenzinY.S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. K.Charmaz (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
6. A.Clarke (Ed.). (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. J.CorbinA.Strauss (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. I.Dey (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9. G.L.Evans (2013). A novice researcher’s first walk through the maze of grounded theory: rationalization for classical grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 37–55.
10. J.S.B.EvansD.E.Over (2013). Reasoning to and from belief: Deduction and induction are still distinct. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(3-4), 267–283.
11. J.FendtW.Sachs (2008). Grounded theory method in management research: Users’ perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 430–455.
12. C.A.Fritz (1960). What is induction?Journal of Philosophy, 57, 126–138.
13. J.GarstN.KerrS.HarrisL.Sheppard (2002). Satisficing in hypothesis generation. American Journal of Psychology, 115(4), 475–500.
14. B.GlaserA.Strauss (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
15. B.Glaser (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociological Press.
16. B.G.Glaser (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17. R.JohnsonA.J.Onwuegbuzie (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(14), 14–26.
18. A.E.Lawson (2003). Allchin’s shoehorn, or why science is hypothetico-deductive. Science & Education, 12(3), 331–337.
19. A.E.Lawson (2005). What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 716–740.
20. K.Locke (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London, UK: Sage.
21. J.M.MorseP.N.SternJ.CorbinB.BowersK.CharmazA.E.Clarke (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
22. D.Partington (Eds.). (2002). Essential skills for management research. London, UK: Sage.
23. I.Walsh (2014). Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: An enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems. Advance online publication. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.23