Correction: Genome-wide association study on male genital shape and size in Drosophila melanogaster (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:7 (e0132846) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132846);Genome-wide association study on male genital shape and size in Drosophila melanogaster

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Takahara, Baku ^a   Takahashi, Kazuo H ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC CODE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; INBRED STRAIN; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; ORGAN SIZE; POSTERIOR LOBE MORPHOLOGY; POSTERIOR LOBE SHAPE; POSTERIOR LOBE SIZE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WOLBACHIA INFECTION; WOLBACHIA PIPIENTIS; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENITALIA, MALE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84941367667     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205301     Document Type: Erratum

References (35)

1. Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia: Harvard University Press.
2. Eberhard WG (2001) Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis) and theories of genitalic evolution. Evolution 55:93-102. PMID: 11263749
3. Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2004) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:87-93. PMID: 16701234
4. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I (1999) Copulatory behavior, genital morphology and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution 53:147-156.
5. Danielsson I, Askenmo C (1999) Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:149-156.
6. House CM, Simmons LW (2002) Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water strider Gerris lacustris. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 270:447-455.
7. Otronen M (1998) Male genital traits and mating interval affect male fertilization success in the water Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 42:185-191.
8. Arnqvist G, Thornhill R (1998) Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water striders. Genetics Research 71:193-212.
9. Ashburner M, Golic KG, Hawley RS (2005) Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
10. Kamimura Y, Mitsumoto H (2011) Comparative copulation anatomy of the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Entomological Science 14:399-410.
11. Jagadeeshan S, Singh RS (2006) A time-sequence functional analysis of mating behaviour and genital coupling in Drosophila: role of cryptic female choice and male sex-drive in the evolution of male genitalia. J Evol Biol 19:1058-1070. PMID: 16780507
12. Masly JP, Kamimura Y (2014) Asymmetric mismatch in strain-specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females. Evolution 68:2401-2411. doi: 10.1111/evo.12436 PMID: 24758304
13. Le Vasseur-Viens H, Polak M, Moehring AJ (2015) No evidence for external genital morphology affecting cryptic female choice and reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Evolution.
14. McNeil CL, Bain CL, Macdonald SJ (2011) Multiple quantitative trait loci influence the shape of a malespecific genital structure in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 1:343-351. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000661 PMID: 22384345
15. Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC (1996) Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142:1129-1145. PMID: 8846893
16. Tanaka KM, Hopfen C, Herbert MR, Schlotterer C, Stern DL, Masly JP, et al. (2015) Genetic Architecture and Functional Characterization of Genes Underlying the Rapid Diversification of Male External Genitalia Between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana. Genetics 200:357-369. doi: 10. 1534/genetics.114.174045 PMID: 25783699
17. Macdonald SJ, Goldstein DB (1999) A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics 153:1683-1699. PMID: 10581276
18. Mackay TF, Richards S, Stone EA, Barbadilla A, Ayroles JF, Zhu D, et al. (2012) The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature 482:173-178. doi: 10.1038/nature10811 PMID: 22318601
19. Rasband WS (1997-2011) ImageJ. Bethesda, Maryland: U. S. National Institutes of Health.
20. Masly JP, Dalton JE, Srivastava S, Chen L, Arbeitman MN (2011) The genetic basis of rapidly evolving male genital morphology in Drosophila. Genetics 189:357-374. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130815 PMID: 21750260
21. Kuhl FP, Girardina CR (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18:236-258.
22. Bonhomme V, Picq S, Gaucherel C, J. C (2014) Momocs: Outline analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software 56:13.
23. Arnqvist G, Martensson T (1998) Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44:73-96.
24. Fry AJ, Palmer MR, Rand DM (2004) Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity (Edinb) 93:379-389.
25. Turner MJ, Kleeberger SR, Lightfoot JT (2005) Influence of genetic background on daily running-wheel activity differs with aging. Physiol Genomics 22:76-85. PMID: 15855385
26. Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW (2010) Life history variation in an artificially selected population of Drosophila melanogaster: pleiotropy, superflies, and age-specific adaptation. Evolution 64:3409-3416. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01139.x PMID: 20874737
27. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 57:289-300.
28. Inagaki S, Numata K, Kondo T, Tomita M, Yasuda K, Kanai A, et al. (2005) Identification and expression analysis of putative mRNA-like non-coding RNA in Drosophila. Genes Cells 10:1163-1173. PMID: 16324153
29. Chatterjee SS, Uppendahl LD, Chowdhury MA, Ip PL, Siegal ML (2011) The female-specific doublesex isoform regulates pleiotropic transcription factors to pattern genital development in Drosophila. Development 138:1099-1109. doi: 10.1242/dev. 055731 PMID: 21343364
30. Morton DB, Clemens-Grisham R, Hazelett DJ, Vermehren-Schmaedick A (2010) Infertility and male mating behavior deficits associated with Pde1c in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 186:159-165. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.118018 PMID: 20551439
31. Morton DB, Hudson ML (2002) Cyclic GMP regulation and function in insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 29:1-54.
32. Day JP, Dow JA, Houslay MD, Davies SA (2005) Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem J 388:333-342. PMID: 15673286
33. Kleppisch T (2009) Phosphodiesterases in the central nervous system. In: Schmidt HHH, Hofmann F, Stasch J-P, editors. cGMP: Generators, effectors and therapeutic implications: Springer. pp. 71-92.
34. Shingleton AW, Estep CM, Driscoll MV, Dworkin I (2009) Many ways to be small: different environmental regulators of size generate distinct scaling relationships in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 276: Computer Graphics and Image Processing 2625-2633.
35. Zeng ZB, Liu J, Stam LF, Kao C-H, Mercer JM, Laurie CC (2000) Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila Species. Genetics 154:299-310. PMID: 10628989