How commonly is the diagnosis of gastric low grade dysplasia upgraded following endoscopic resection? A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Zhao, Guangfeng ^a,b   Xue, Meng ^a,b   Hu, Yingying ^a,b   Lai, Sanchuan ^b,c   Chen, Shujie ^b,c   Wang, Liangjing ^a,b  

^a THE SECOND AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC GASTRITIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; GASTROINTESTINAL DYSPLASIA; GASTROSCOPY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; NARROW BAND IMAGING; RISK FACTOR; STOMACH BIOPSY; STOMACH CARCINOMA; ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; FEMALE; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; STOMACH; STOMACH MUCOSA; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; FEMALE; GASTRIC MUCOSA; GASTROSCOPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RISK FACTORS; STOMACH; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84941355910     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132699     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis. 2012; 13: 2-9. doi: 10.1111/j. 1751-2980.2011.00550.x PMID: 22188910
2. Nagayo T. Dysplasia of the gastric mucosa and its relation to the precancerous state. Gann. 1981; 72: 813-823. PMID: 7341333
3. Du Y, Bai Y, Xie P, Fang J, Wang X, Hou X, et al. Chronic gastritis in China: a national multi-center survey. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14: 21. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-21 PMID: 24502423
4. Kim YJ, Park JC, Kim JH, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC, et al. Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions. Endoscopy. 2010; 42: 620-626. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255524 PMID: 20623445
5. Lauwers GY, Carneiro F. WHO Classification of tumours of the digestive system. Gastric carcinoma. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2010.
6. You WC, Blot WJ, Li JY, Chang YS, Jin ML, Kneller R, et al. Precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk of stomach cancer. Cancer Res. 1993; 53: 1317-1321. PMID: 8443811
7. Sharma P, Montgomery E. Gastrointestinal dysplasia. Pathology. 2013; 45: 273-285. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e32835f21d7 PMID: 23442738
8. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000; 47: 251-255. PMID: 10896917
9. Lansdown M, Quirke P, Dixon MF, Axon AT, Johnston D. High grade dysplasia of the gastric mucosa: a marker for gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1990; 31: 977-983. PMID: 2210465
10. Stolte M. The new Vienna classification of epithelial neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract: advantages and disadvantages. Virchows Arch. 2003; 442: 99-106. PMID: 12596058
11. Testino G. Gastric precancerous changes: carcinogenesis, clinical behaviour immunophenotype study and surveillance. Panminerva Med. 2006; 48: 109-118. PMID: 16953148
12. Rugge M, Cassaro M, Di Mario F, Leo G, Leandro G, Russo VM, et al. The long term outcome of gastric non-invasive neoplasia. Gut. 2003; 52: 1111-1116. PMID: 12865267
13. Yamada H, Ikegami M, Shimoda T, Takagi N, Maruyama M. Long-term follow-up study of gastric adenoma/dysplasia. Endoscopy. 2004; 36: 390-396. PMID: 15100945
14. Bennett C, Wang Y, Pan T. Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; CD004276.
15. Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, et al. Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy. 2011; 43: 465-471. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256236 PMID: 21425043
16. Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC, Marcos-Pinto R, Monteiro-Soares M, O'Connor A, et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy. 2012; 44: 74-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291491 PMID: 22198778
17. Szalóki T, Tóth V, Tiszlavicz L, Czakó L. Flat gastric polyps: results of forceps biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and long-term follow-up. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006; 41: 1105-1109. PMID: 16938725
18. Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, et al. The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59: 421-427. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2874-8 PMID: 24366779
19. Kim MK, Jang JY, Kim JW, Shim JJ, Lee CK, Chang YW, et al. Is lesion size an independent indication for endoscopic resection of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2014; 59: 428-435. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2805-8 PMID: 23912249
20. Lim H, Jung HY, Park YS, Na HK, Ahn JY, Choi JY, et al. Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 1256-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3316-6 PMID: 24310738
21. Jeon HK, Ryu HY, Cho MY, Kim HS, Kim JW, Park HJ, et al. A randomized trial to determine the diagnostic accuracy of conventional vs. jumbo forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial neoplasias before endoscopic submucosal dissection; open-label study. Gastric Cancer. 2014; 17: 661-668. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0322-2 PMID: 24337434
22. Kim JH, Kim SH, Park WH, Jang JS, Bang JS, Yang SH, et al. Predictable factors of histologic discrepancy of gastric cancer between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic treatment specimen. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012; 59: 354-359. PMID: 22617529
23. Hwang EJ, Chang YW, Jang JY. Clinical parameters including serum pepsinogen level and management strategy in premalignant gastric dysplasia. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2012; 54: S1131.
24. Tsuji Y, Ohata K, Sekiguchi M, Ohno A, Ito T, Chiba H, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging helps determine the management of gastric adenomas. Gastric Cancer. 2012; 15: 414-418. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0133-2 PMID: 22252155
25. Won CS, Cho MY, Kim HS, et al. Upgrade of Lesions Initially Diagnosed as Low-Grade Gastric Dysplasia upon Forceps Biopsy Following Endoscopic Resection. Gut Liver. 2011; 5: 187-193. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.2.187 PMID: 21814599
26. Won CS, Cho MY, Kim HS, Kim HJ, Suk KT, Kim MY, et al. Progression of category 3 of vienna gastric neoplasia classification [low-grade-dysplasia (LGD)]: a 50-months follow-up and role of endoscopic Mucosal resection (EMR). Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 5: S229-30.
27. Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH, Kim SP, Lee SH, Lee TH, et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 25: 1507-1513. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.006367.x PMID: 20796147
28. Sung HY, Cheung DY, Cho SH, Kim JI, Park SH, Han JY, et al. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 21: 190-195. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283140ebd PMID: 19092673
29. Kim HS, Kim JW, Park DH, Kim MY, Kim KH, Kim HJ, et al. Features of gastric low-grade dysplasia at first biopsy showing advanced histology after endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63: AB150.
30. L Lauwers GY, Ban S, Mino M, Ota S, Matsumoto T, Arai S, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: a study of 39 cases with emphasis on the evaluation of specimens and recommendations for optimal pathologic analysis. Mod Pathol. 2004; 17: 2-8. PMID: 14631370
31. Park DI, Rhee PL, Kim JE, Hyun JG, Kim YH, Son HJ, et al. Risk factors suggesting malignant transformation of gastric adenoma: univariate and multivariate analysis. Endoscopy. 2001; 33: 501-506. PMID: 11437043
32. Wears RL. Advanced statistics: statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster-randomized data. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9: 330-341. PMID: 11927463
33. Koulaouzidis A, Rondonotti E, Giannakou A, Plevris JN. Diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with iron-deficiency anemia: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76: 983-992. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.035 PMID: 23078923
34. Mei M, Ni J, Liu D, Jin P, Sun L. EUS elastography for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a metaanalysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77: 578-589. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.035 PMID: 23199646
35. Yeh JM, Hur C, Kuntz KM, Ezzati M, Goldie SJ. Cost-effectiveness of treatment and endoscopic surveillance of precancerous lesions to prevent gastric cancer. Cancer. 2010; 116: 2941-2953. doi: 10. 1002/cncr.25030 PMID: 20564399
36. Muehldorfer SM, Stolte M, Martus P, Hahn EG, Ell C, Multicenter Study Group "Gastric Polyps". Diagnostic accuracy of forceps biopsy versus polypectomy for gastric polyps: a prospective multicentre study. Gut. 2002; 50: 465-470. PMID: 11889063
37. Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K. Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2009; 41: 462-467. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214594 PMID: 19418401
38. Keswani RN, Nayar R, Mahajan A, Komanduri S. Touch preparation of jumbo forceps biopsies allows rapid adequacy assessment of subepithelial GI masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 411-414. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1238 PMID: 21620400
39. Othman MO, Wallace MB. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 2011, a Western perspective. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011; 35: 288-294. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.02.006 PMID: 21458402
40. Pech O, Manner H, Ell C. Endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2011; 21: 81-94. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.10.001 PMID: 21112499
41. Zhou Y, Dendukuri N. Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-Analyses of binary data: the case of meta-Analyses of diagnostic accuracy. Stat Med. 2014; 33: 2701-2717. doi: 10.1002/sim.6115 PMID: 24903142
42. Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW. Meta-Analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008; 75: 431-439. PMID: 18595551
43. Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2002; 21: 1525-1537. PMID: 12111918
44. Harbord RM, Deeks JJ, Egger M, Whiting P, Sterne JA. A unification of models for meta-Analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics. 2007; 8: 239-251. PMID: 16698768