Touch preparation of jumbo forceps biopsies allows rapid adequacy assessment of subepithelial GI masses

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 411-414

  Keswani, Rajesh N ^a   Nayar, Ritu ^a   Mahajan, Aparna ^a   Komanduri, Srinadh ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

EUS FNA; EUS guided FNA; GI stromal tumor; GIST; JF TPC; jumbo forceps with touch preparation cytology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BITE ON BITE FORCEPS BIOPSY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FORCEPS; GASTROINTESTINAL BIOPSY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL TUMOR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JUMBO FORCEPS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOUCH PREPARATION CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; DUODENAL NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STOMACH NEOPLASMS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 80955181059     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1238     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P. Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991;5:20-3.
2. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 2006;130:2217-28. (Pubitemid 43816972)
3. Karaca C, Turner BG, Cizginer S, et al. Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of small gastric subepithelial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:722-7.
4. Hwang JH, Saunders MD, Rulyak SJ, et al. Aprospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:202-8. (Pubitemid 41021542)
5. Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 2010;42:300-5.
6. Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D, et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2009;41:329-34.
7. Komanduri S, Jakate S. The utility of a new jumbo biopsy forceps for tissue acquisition of gastric subepithelial masses [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:AB105.
8. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1289-94. (Pubitemid 36741524)
9. Vanderheyden AD, Proctor KA, Rizk MK, et al. The value of touch imprint cytology in EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:44-50. (Pubitemid 351902210)
10. Gines A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, et al. Prospective study of a Trucut needle for performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:597-601. (Pubitemid 41383783)
11. Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1218-23.
12. Ji JS, Lee BI, Choi KY, et al. Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions. Korean J Intern Med 2009;24:101-5.