Morphological and property investigations of carboxylated cellulose nanofibers extracted from different biological species

Cellulose

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 3127-3135

  Su, Ying ^a   Burger, Christian ^a   Ma, Hongyang ^a   Chu, Benjamin ^a   Hsiao, Benjamin S ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bamboo; Cellulose nanofibers; Cotton; SAXS; TEMPO oxidation; Wood

Indexed keywords

BAMBOO; CELLULOSE; COTTON; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; NANOFIBERS; OXIDATION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY SCATTERING;

BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BIOLOGICAL SPECIES; CELLULOSE NANOFIBERS; DEGREE OF OXIDATIONS; MECHANICAL DEFIBRILLATION; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; SAXS; TEMPO OXIDATIONS;

WOOD;

BACTERIA; BAMBOO; CELLULOSE; COTTON; OXIDATION; PICEA; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WOOD;

EID: 84941343509     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-015-0698-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allaire M, Yang L (2011) Biomolecular solution X-ray scattering at the National Synchrotron Light Source. J Synchrotron Radiat 18:41–44. doi:10.1107/S0909049510036022
2. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S (2001) Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 17:21–27. doi:10.1021/La001070m
3. Azeredo HMC, Mattoso LHC, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Ceotto G, Munford ML, Wood D, McHugh TH (2010) Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75:N1–N7. doi:10.1111/J.1750-3841.2009.01386.X
4. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6:1048–1054. doi:10.1021/Bm049300p
5. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180. doi:10.1007/S10570-006-9061-4
6. Braun B, Dorgan JR, Chandler JP (2008) Cellulosic nanowhiskers. Theory and application of light scattering from polydisperse spheroids in the Rayleigh–Gans–Debye regime. Biomacromolecules 9:1255–1263. doi:10.1021/Bm7013137
7. Campbell NA (1996) Biology, 4th edn. Benjamin Cummings, NY
8. Dong XM, Revol JF, Gray DG (1998) Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 5:19–32. doi:10.1023/A:1009260511939
9. Eichhorn SJ et al (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33. doi:10.1007/S10853-009-3874-0
10. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C (2008) The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 9:57–65. doi:10.1021/bm700769p
11. Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Wata T, Kumamoto Y, Isogai A (2009) Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 10:162–165. doi:10.1021/Bm801065u
12. Grunert M, Winter WT (2002) Nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. J Polym Environ 10:27–30. doi:10.1023/A:1021065905986
13. Habibi Y, Chanzy H, Vignon MR (2006) TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers Cellulose 13:679–687. doi:10.1007/S10570-006-9075-Y
14. Habibi Y, Goffin AL, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A (2008) Bionanocomposites based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. J Mater Chem 18:5002–5010. doi:10.1039/B809212e
15. Habibi Y, Mahrouz M, Vignon MR (2009) Microfibrillated cellulose from the peel of prickly pear fruits. Food Chem 115(423–429):2008. doi:10.1016/J.Foodchem.12.034
16. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500. doi:10.1021/Cr900339w
17. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys Mater 89:461–466. doi:10.1007/S00339-007-4175-6
18. Khan RA, Salmieri S, Dussault D, Uribe-Calderon J, Kamal MR, Safrany A, Lacroix M (2010) Production and properties of nanocellulose-reinforced methylcellulose-based biodegradable films. J Agric Food Chem 58:7878–7885. doi:10.1021/Jf1006853
19. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Edit 44:3358–3393. doi:10.1002/Anie.200460587
20. Leitner J, Hinterstoisser B, Wastyn M, Keckes J, Gindl W (2007) Sugar beet cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites. Cellulose 14:419–425. doi:10.1007/S10570-007-9131-2
21. Ma HY, Burger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2011) Ultrafine polysaccharide nanofibrous membranes for water purification. Biomacromolecules 12:970–976. doi:10.1021/Bm1013316
22. Ma HY, Buger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2014) Fabrication and characterization of cellulose nanofiber based thin-film nanofibrous composite membranes. J Membr Sci 454:272–282. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.055
23. Malainine ME, Mahrouz M, Dufresne A (2005) Thermoplastic nanocomposites based on cellulose microfibrils from Opuntia ficus-indica parenchyma cell. Compos Sci Technol 65(1520–1526):2005. doi:10.1016/J.Compscitech.01.003
24. Montanari S, Rountani M, Heux L, Vignon MR (2005) Topochemistry of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals resulting from TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Macromolecules 38:1665–1671. doi:10.1021/Ma048396c
25. Paakko M et al (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941. doi:10.1021/Bm061215p
26. Pandey JK, Lee JW, Chu WS, Kim CS, Ahn SH (2008) Cellulose nano whiskers from grass of Korea. Macromol Res 16:396–398
27. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–1691. doi:10.1021/Bm060154s
28. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2485–2491. doi:10.1021/Bm0703970
29. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, Kimura S, Fukuzumi H, Heux L, Isogai A (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromolecules 10:1992–1996. doi:10.1021/Bm900414t
30. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules 14:248–253. doi:10.1021/Bm301674e
31. Samir MASA, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6:612–626. doi:10.1021/Bm0493685
32. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494. doi:10.1007/S10570-010-9405-Y
33. Su Y, Burger C, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2014) Characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers in aqueous suspension by small-angle X-ray scattering. J Appl Crystallogr 47:788–798. doi:10.1107/S1600576714005020
34. Su Y, Burger C, Ma H, Chu B, Hsiao BS (2015) Exploring the nature of cellulose microfibrils Biomacromolecules 16:1201–1209. doi:10.1021/bm501897z
35. Taniguchi T, Okamura K (1998) New films produced from microfibrillated natural fibres. Polym Int 47:291–294. doi:10.1002/(Sici)1097-0126(199811)47:3<291:Aid-Pi11>3.0.Co;2-1
36. van den Berg O, Capadona JR, Weder C (2007) Preparation of homogeneous dispersions of tunicate cellulose whiskers in organic solvents. Biomacromolecules 8:1353–1357. doi:10.1021/Bm061104q
37. Wang B, Sain M (2007) Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers. Compos Sci Technol 67(2521–2527):2006. doi:10.1016/J.Compscitech.12.015
38. Xu XZ, Wang HR, Jiang L, Wang XN, Payne SA, Zhu JY, Li RP (2014) Comparison between cellulose nanocrystal and cellulose nanofibril reinforced poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers and their novel shish-kebab-like crystalline structures. Macromolecules 47:3409–3416. doi:10.1021/Ma402627j
39. Yang QL, Wu CN, Saito T, Isogai A (2014) Cellulose-clay layered nanocomposite films fabricated from aqueous cellulose/LiOH/urea solution. Carbohyd Polym 100(179–184):2012. doi:10.1016/J.Carbpol.10.044