Multifunctional recreation and nouveau heritage values in plantation forests

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 131-151

  Rolfe, John ^a   Windle, Jill ^a  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cultural heritage; Discrete choice experiments; Forest recreation; Historic sites; Non use value; Non market valuation; Option value; Q5 (Environmental Economics)

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; HISTORIC PRESERVATION;

CULTURAL HERITAGES; DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST RECREATION; HISTORIC SITE; NON USE VALUE; NON-MARKET VALUATION; OPTION VALUE;

FORESTRY;

CULTURAL HERITAGE; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; PLANTATION FORESTRY; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; VALUATION;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84941317273     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2015.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abildtrup J., Garcia S., Olsen S.B., Stenger A. Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 92(1):67-77.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Catalogue No 1345.4-South Australia Statistics, June 2011 2011, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
3. Barrio M., Loureiro M.L. A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1023-1030.
4. Bateman I., Jones L.P. Contrasting conventional with multi-level modelling approaches to meta-analysis: expectation consistency in U.K. woodland recreation values. Land Econ. 2003, 79(2):235-258.
5. Brey R., Riera P., Mogas J. Estimation of forest values using choice modeling: an application to Spanish forests. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:305-312.
6. Cubbage F., Harou P., Sills E. Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. For. Policy Econ. 2007, 9:833-851.
7. Czajkowski M., Bartczak A., Giergiczny M., Navrud S., Zylicz T. Providing preference-based support for forest ecosystem service management. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 39:1-12.
8. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Horne P., Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 207(1-2):189-199.
10. Juutinen A., Mitani Y., Mantymaa E., Shoji Y., Siikamaki P., Svento R. Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: a choice experiment application. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1231-1239.
11. Krinsky I., Robb A. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1986, 68:715-719.
12. Lindhjem H. 20 years of stated preference valuation of non-timber benefits from Fennoscandian forests: a meta-analysis. J. For. Econ. 2007, 12:251-277.
13. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Maddisson D., Mourato S. Valuing different road options for Stonehenge. Valuing Cultural Heritage 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. S. Navrud, R.C. Ready (Eds.).
15. Morey R.E., Buchanan T., Waldman D.M. Estimating the benefits and costs to mountain bikers of changes in trail characteristics, access fees, and site closures: choice experiments and benefits transfer. J. Environ. Manage. 2002, 64:411-422.
16. Valuing Cultural Heritage 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. S. Navrud, R.C. Ready (Eds.).
17. Poe G., Giraud K., Loomis J. Computational methods for measuring the differences of empirical distributions. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87(2):353-365.
18. Primary Industries and Regions SA.(PIRSA) The history of forestry in South Australia. Factsheet 2014.
19. Powell J. Expanding horizons: environmental and cultural values within natural boundaries. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 2000, 6(1):49-65.
20. Taylor K., Lennon J. Cultural landscapes: a bridge between culture and nature?. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 2011, 17(6):537-554.
21. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Willis K.G. Assessing visitor preferences in the management of archaeological and heritage attractions: a case-study of Hadrian's Roman Wall. Int. J. Tourism Res. 2009, 33:85-108.
23. Willis K., Garrod G., Scarpa R., Macmillan D., Bateman I. Non-market benefits of forestry. Phase 1 Report to the Forestry Commission 2000, Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management, University of Newcastle, UK.
24. Zandersen M., Tol R.S.J. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. J. For. Econ. 2009, 15(1-2):109-130.