Conflict and Cooperation in the Development of US–China Relations in Science and Technology: Empirical Observations and Theoretical Implications

Global Power Shift

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 143-159

  Suttmeier, Richard P ^a   Simon, Denis Fred ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

International scientific cooperation; Science; Science and foreign policy; Technology and international relations; US China relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941280230     PISSN: 21987343     EISSN: 21987351     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Atkinson, R. D. (2012). Enough is enough: Confronting Chinese innovation mercantilism. http://www.itif.org/publications/enough-enough-confronting-chinese-innovation-mercantilism. Accessed July 24, 2013.
2. Cao, C., Suttmeier, R. P., & Simon, D. F. (2006). China’s 15-year science and technology plan. Physics Today, 59(12), 38–43.
3. CERC. (2013). US-China clean energy research center. http://www.us-china-cerc.org/. Accessed July 24, 2013.
4. Chang, I. (1995). Thread of the silkworm. New York, NY: Basic Books.
5. Department of State. (2012). United States – China science and technology cooperation: Biennial report to the United States Congress. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/197119. pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
6. Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665–677.
7. Hannas, W. C., Mulvenon, J., & Puglisi, A. B. (2013). Chinese industrial espionage: Technology acquisition and military modernisation. London: Routledge.
8. Jin, B., Rousseau, R., Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (2007). The role of ethnic ties in international collaboration: The overseas Chinese phenomenon. In D. Torres-Salinas & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISSI 2007 (pp. 427–436). Madrid: CSIC.
9. Larson, C., & Xin, H. (2013). Divided loyalties land scientists in hot water. Science, 340(6136), 1029–1031.
10. May, M. M., Johnston, A., Panofsky, W. K. H., DiCapua, M., & Franklin, L. (1999). The Cox Committee report: An assessment. Palo Alto, CA: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University.
11. McGregor, J. (2010). China’s drive for ‘indigenous innovation:’ A web of industrial policies. Washington, DC: US Chamber of Commerce. http://www.uschamber.com/reports/chinas-drive-indigenous-innovation-web-industrial-policies. Accessed July 24, 2013.
12. Mervis, J. (2012). Wolf, OSTP settle China spat. Science INSIDER. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/wolf-ostp-settle-china-spat.html. Accessed July 24, 2013.
13. National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators, 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
14. OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
15. Schwaag Serger, S., & Breidne, M. (2007). China’s fifteen-year plan for science and technology: An assessment. Asia Policy, 4(1), 135–164.
16. Skolnikoff, E. B. (2002). Will science and technology undermine the international political system? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2, 29–45.
17. Smith, K. (1998). The role of scientists in normalizing US China relations: 1965–1979. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 114–136). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
18. Springut, M., Schlaikjer, S., & Chen, D. (2011). China’s program for science and technology modernization: Implications for American competitiveness. Report prepared for the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. http://origin.www.uscc.gov/research_archive? page¼3. Accessed July 24, 2013.
19. Suttmeier, R. P. (1998). Scientific cooperation and conflict management in US-China relations from 1978 to the present. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 137–164). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.
20. Suttmeier, R. P. (2008). State, self organization, and identity in the building of Sino US cooperation in science and technology. Asian Perspective, 32(1), 5–31.
21. Suttmeier, R. P. (2010). From cold war science diplomacy to partnering in a networked world: 30 years of Sino-US relations in science and technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 18–28.
22. Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (1999). China faces the new industrial revolution: Research and innovation strategies for the 21st century. Asian Perspective, 23(3), 153–200.
23. U.S. House of Representatives. (1999). Report of the select committee on US national security and military/commercial concerns with the People’s Republic of China. 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Report 105-851.
24. White House. (2012). Fact sheet: U.S.-China science and technology cooperation highlights: 32 years of collaboration. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/st-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
25. Wilsdon, J., & Keeley, J. (2007). China: The next science superpower? http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/atlaschina. Accessed July 24, 2013.