Predicting consumer demand responses to carbon labels

Ecological Economics

Volumn 119, Issue , 2015, Pages 168-180

  Shewmake, Sharon ^a   Okrent, Abigail ^b   Thabrew, Lanka ^c   Vandenbergh, Michael ^d  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon emissions; Carbon footprint; Consumer behavior; Eco labels; Food demand systems; Food labeling; Life cycle analysis

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; COMPOSITE; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; EMISSION CONTROL; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD MARKET; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MEAT;

EID: 84941271123     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Akter S., Bennett J. Household perceptions of climate change and preferences for mitigation action: the case of the carbon pollution reduction scheme in Australia. Clim. Chang. 2011, 1-20.
2. Andreyeva T., Long M.D., Brownell K.D. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100(2):216-222.
3. Baron D., Diermeier D. Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 2007, 16:599-634.
4. Bauman H., Tillman A. The Hitch Hiker's Guide to LCA: An Orientation in Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Applications 2004, Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.
5. Bergtold J., Akobundu E., Peterson E. The FAST method: estimating unconditional demand elasticities for processed foods in the presence of fixed effects. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2004, 29(2):276-295.
6. 2 emission. Energy Policy 2005, 33:197-208.
7. Bjørner T., Hansen L., Russell C. Environmental labelling and consumers' choice-an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 47(3):411-434.
8. 2 emissions. Clim. Chang. 2008, 90(3):299-313.
9. Cai B., Cameron T., Gerdes G. Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in climate change policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010, 46(4):429-458.
10. Carlsson F., Kataria M., Krupnick A., Lampi E., Lofgren A., Qin P., Chung S., Sterner T. Paying for mitigation: a multiple country study. Resources for the Future, Discussion Papers 2010.
11. Carlsson-Kanyama A., Ekstrom M., Shanahan H. Food and life cycle energy inputs: consequences of diet and ways to increase energy efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 44:293-307.
12. Carlsson-Kanyama A., González A. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89(5):1704S-1709S.
13. Carnegie Mellon University Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA), U.S. 2002 Industry Benchmark Model 2008, Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute, (www.eiolca.net. Accessed May 16, 2012).
14. Carpentier A., Guyomard H. Unconditional elasticities in two-stage systems: an approximate solution. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2001, 83(1):222-229.
15. CDC, NCHS National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data 2011, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD, (2007-2008, Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm, Accessed May 16, 2012).
16. CE Delft, Germanischer Lloyd, MARINTEK, Det Norske Veritas Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Shipping and Implementation Guidance for the Marine Fuel Sulphur Directive 2006, (Delft, Netherlands. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/transport/final_report.pdf, Accessed November 19, 2012).
17. Cohen M., Vandenbergh M. The potential role of carbon labeling in a green economy. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(S1):S53-S63.
18. Colman T., Paster P. Red, white and 'green': the cost of carbon in the global wine trade. J. Wine Res. 2009, 20(1):15-26.
19. Dastrup S., Zivin J., Costa D., Kahn M. Understanding the solar home price premium: electricity generation and "green" social status. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2012, 56(5):961-973.
20. Diederich J., Goeschl T. Willingness to pay for voluntary climate actions and its determinants: field-experimental evidence. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2014, 57(3):405-429.
21. Dietz T., Gardner J., Gilligan J., Stern P., Vandenbergh M. Household action can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:18452-18456.
22. Druckman A., Chitnis M., Sorrell S., Jackson T. Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy 2011, 39(6):3573-3581.
23. Eales J., Durham C., Wessells C. Generalized models of Japanese demand for fish. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1997, 79(4):1153-1163.
24. Echeverría R., Moreira V., Sepúlveda C., Wittwer C. Willingness to pay for carbon footprint on foods. Br. Food J. 2014, 116(2):186-196.
25. Edwards-Jones G., Plassmann K., York E., Hounsome B., Jones D., Mila ì Canals L. Vulnerability of exporting nations to the development of a carbon label in the United Kingdom. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2009, 12:479-490.
26. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Available at, (Accessed November 19, 2012). http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2012-ES.pdf.
27. Environmental Working Group Meat Eater's Guide to Climate and Health Available at:, (Accessed May 16, 2012). http://www.ewg.org/meateatersguide/.
28. Frischknecht R., et al. The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2005, 10:3-9. (Available at: www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/01_OverviewAndMethodology.pdf, accessed February 2012).
29. Gadema Z., Oglethorpe D. The use and usefulness of carbon labelling food: a policy perspective from a survey of UK supermarket shoppers. Food Policy 2011, 36:815-822.
30. Garnett T. Cooking up a storm: food, greenhouse gas emissions, and our changing climate. Food Climate Research Network 2008, Center for Environmental Strategy, University of Surry, UK.
31. Grabs J. The rebound effects of switching to vegetarianism. A microeconomic analysis of Swedish consumption behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 116:270-279.
32. Grebitus C., Steiner B., Veeman M. Personal values and decision making: evidence from environmental footprint labeling in Canada. Am. J. Agri. Econ. Pap. Proc. 2013, 95(2):397-403.
33. Gruère G. An analysis of the growth in environmental labelling and information schemes. J. Consum. Policy 2015, 38(1):1-18.
34. Harding M., Lovenheim M. The effect of prices on nutrition: comparing the impact of product- and nutrient-specific taxes. NBER Working Paper Series, 19781 2014.
35. Hartikainen H., Roininen T., Katajajuuri J., Pulkkinen H. Finnish consumer perceptions of carbon footprints and carbon labelling of food products. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 73:285-293.
36. Hendrickson C., Lave L., Matthews H.S. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach 2006, Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C.
37. Herring H., Sorrell S. Energy Efficiency and Sustainability: The Rebound Effect 2009, Palgrave Macmillan.
38. Hilmer C.E., Holt M.T., Bishop R.C. Bootstrapping your fish or fishing for bootstraps? Precision of welfare loss estimates from a globally concave inverse demand model of commercial fish landings in the US Great Lakes. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 93(1):98-112.
39. Hornibrook S., May C., Fearne A. Sustainable development and the consumer: exploring the role of carbon labelling in retail supply chains. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2013, (Published, online). 10.1002/bse.1823.
40. Huang K.S. A Complete System of U.S. Demand for Food 1993, USDA Economic Research Service Technical Bulletin 1821, Washington, DC.
41. International Emissions Trading Agency and Environmental Defense Fund New Zealand: The World's Carbon Markets: A Case Study Guide to Emissions Trading (Accessed April 3, 2015). http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Climate/background-note_carbon-tax.pdf.
42. 2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion: Highlights 2011, 2011 edition.
43. Ippolito P., Matthios A. Information, advertising and health choices: a study of the cereal market. Rand J. Econ. 1990, 21(3):459-480.
44. Johnson E., Nemet G.F. Willingness to pay for climate policy: a review of estimates. La Follette School Working Paper No. 2010-011 2010, LaFollette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
45. Jones C.M., Kammen D.M. Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45(9):4088-4095.
46. Kahn M. Do greens drive Hummers of hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 54(2):129-145.
47. Kahn M., Kok N. The capitalization of green labels in the California housing market. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2014, 47:25-34.
48. Kahn M., Vaughn R. Green market geography: the spatial clustering of hybrid vehicles and LEED registered buildings. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 2009, 9(2).
49. Kortelainen M., Raychaudhuri J., Roussillon B. Price impacts of carbon reduction labels: evidence from scanner data. Working Paper 2012, (available at http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers/eea-esem/2012/2717/Carbon_Labeling_15Feb2012.pdf, Accessed August 29, 2012).
50. Lanz B., Wurlod D., Panzone L., Swanson T. Clean substitutes and the effectiveness of carbon footprint labels vs. Pigouvian subsidies: evidence from a field experiment. Working Paper 2014, (available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/gii/ciesrp/cies_rp_32.html, Accessed April 7, 2015).
51. Lee J., Yoo S., Kwak S. Public willingness to pay for preventing climate change. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2010, 17(4-6):619-622.
52. Lenox M., Eesley C. Private environmental activism and the selection and response of firm targets. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 2009, 18(1):45-73.
53. Loewenstein G., Sunstein C.R., Golman R. Disclosure: psychology changes everything. Working Paper 2013, (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2312708, Accessed October 29, 2013).
54. Loschel A., Sturm B., Vogt C. The demand for climate protection-empirical evidence from Germany. Econ. Lett. 2013, 118(3):415-518.
55. Lyon T., Montgomery A. The means and end of greenwash. Organ. Environ. 2015, 1-27.
56. MacKerron G.J., Egerton C., Gaskell C., Parpia A., Mourato S. Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high) flying young adults in the UK. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1372-1381.
57. Mancino L., Kuchler F., Leibtag E. Getting consumers to eat more whole grains: the role of policy, information, and manufacturers. Food Policy 2008, 33(6):489-496.
58. Matsdotter E., Elofsson K., Arntyr J. Got green milk? Field experimental trail of consumer demand for a climate label. Working Paper 2014, (http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/183076, Accessed April 7, 2015).
59. McCright A., Dunlap R. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative males in the United States. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21(4):1163-1172.
60. Metcalf G. Market-based policy options to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. J. Econ. Perspect. 2009, 23(2):5-27.
61. Metrics Clean Product LCA and Carbon Footprint Analysis Available at:, (Accessed May 16, 2012). http://www.cleanmetrics.com/html/carbon_footprints.htm.
62. Michaud C., Llerena D., Joly I. Willingness to pay for environmental attributes of non-food agricultural products: a real choice experiment. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2013, 40(2):313-329.
63. Mungkung R., Gheewala S., Kanyarushoki C., Hospido A., van der Werf H., Poovarodom N., Bonnet S., Aubin J., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. Product carbon footprinting in Thailand: a step towards sustainable consumption and production?. Environ. Dev. 2012, 3:100-108.
64. Nordhaus W. The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World 2013, Yale University Press, New Haven.
65. Okrent A.M., Alston J.M. The demand for food in the United States: a review of the literature, evaluation of previous estimates, and presentation of new estimates of demand. Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Monograph 2011, 48. (Berkeley, CA, April).
66. Okrent A., Alston J. The demand for disaggregated food-away-from-home and food-at-home products. Economic Research Report 2012, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., (Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/875267/err139.pdf, Accessed October 24, 2012).
67. Onozaka Y., Thilmany McFadden D. Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A cojoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claims. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 93(3):693-706.
68. Onozaka Y., Nurse G., Thilmany McFadden D. Local food consumers: how motivations and perceptions translate to buying behavior. Choices 2010, 25(1).
69. Onozaka Y., Hu W., Thilmany McFadden D. Market-based innovations to alter environmental outcomes: can eco-labeling affect carbon emissions?. Working Paper 2012.
70. Organic Trade Association 2010 Organic Industry Survey Summary available at, (Accessed November 21, 2013). http://www.ota.com/pics/documents/2010OrganicIndustrySurveySummary.pdf.
71. Park J.L., Capps O. Demand for prepared meals by U.S. households. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1997, 79:814-824.
72. Piggott N.E. Measures of precision for estimated welfare effects for producers from generic advertising. Agribusiness 2003, 19(3):379-391.
73. Polonsky M., Vocino A., Grau S., Garma R., Ferdous A. The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. J. Mark. Manag. 2012, 28(3-4):238-263.
74. Quinn, I. 2012. "Frustrated Tesco ditches eco-labels." The Grocer. Jan. 28. Available at , Accessed February 18, 2013. http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/companies/supermarkets/tesco/frustrated-tesco-ditches-eco-labels/225502.article.
75. Richards T.J., Mancino L. Demand for food-away-from-home: a multiple discrete/continuous extreme value model. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2013, 41(1):111-133.
76. Roe B., Sheldon I. Credence good labeling: the efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2007, 83(4):1020-1033.
77. Roe B., Teisl M., Levy A., Russell M. US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2001, 29(11):917-925.
78. Sharp A., Wheeler M. Reducing householders' grocery carbon emissions: carbon literacy and carbon label preferences. Australas. Mark. J. 2013, 21:240-249.
79. Shewmake S., Cohen M.A., Stern P.C., Vandenbergh M.P. Carbon triage: a strategy for developing a viable carbon labeling system. Handbook on Research in Sustainable Consumption 2015, L. Reisch, J. Thøgersen (Eds.).
80. Shuai C., Ding L., Zhang Y., Guo Q., Shuai J. How consumers are willing to pay for low-carbon products? - results from a carbon-labeling scenario experiment in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 83:366-373.
81. Solomon B.D., Johnson N. Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(7):2137-2144.
82. Spaargaren G., van Koppen C., Janssen A., Hendriksen A., Kolfschoten C. Consumer responses to the carbon labelling of food: a real life experiment in a canteen practice. Sociol. Rural. 2013, 53(3):432-453.
83. Specter, M. 2013. "Climate by numbers". The New Yorker, November 11, 2013, 38-43.
84. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
85. Stockton M., Capps O. A micro level demand analysis of selected non-alcoholic beverages with emphasis on container size. Working Paper, Texas A&M University 2005, (http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/19137/1/sp05st02.pdf).
86. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories Ecoinvent v.2 Database 2002, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Hamburg, (Available on-line at: http://www.ecoinvent.org/database, accessed, May 15, 2012). S. C. f. L. C. Inventories (Ed.).
87. Thøgersen J. Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: model development and multinational validation. J. Consum. Policy 2000, 23(3):285-313.
88. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Quarterly Food-at-Home Price Database Available at:, (Accessed May 16, 2012). http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/QFAHPD/qfahpd2.htm.
89. U.S.Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Average Price Database Available at:, (Accessed on January 29, 2011). http://www.bls.gov/cpi/.
90. U.S.Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey Public Microdata, 2008: Detailed Expenditure Files 2010, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.
91. U.S.Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index Database Available at:, (Accessed on March 10, 2010). http://www.bls.gov/cpi/#data.
92. Unnevehr L., Jagmanaite E. Getting rid of trans fats in the U.S.: policies, incentives and progress. Food Policy 2008, 33(6):495-503.
93. Upham P., Dendler L., Bleda M. Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19(4):348-355.
94. Vanclay J.K., Shortiss J., Aulsebrook S., Gillespie A.M., Howell B.C., Johanni R., Maher M.J., Mitchell K.M., Stewart M.D., Yates J. Customer response to carbon labelling of groceries. J. Consum. Policy 2011, 34(1):153-160.
95. Vandenbergh M., Dietz T., Stern P. Time to try carbon labeling. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2011, 1.
96. Vaughan, A. 2012. "Tesco drops carbon-label pledge." The Guardian. Jan 30. Available at , Accessed February 18, 2013. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/30/tesco-drops-carbon-labelling.
97. Vieux F., Darmon N., Touazi D., Soler L.G. Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected individual diets in France: changing the diet structure or consuming less?. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 75:91-101.
98. Viscusi W., Zeckhauser R. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: a rational and behavioral blend. Clim. Chang. 2006, 77(1):151-177.
99. Vlaeminck P., Jiang T., Vranken L. Food labeling and eco-friendly consumption: experimental evidence from a Belgian supermarket. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 108:180-190.
100. Weber C., Matthews H. Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:3508-3513.
101. World Bank Putting a Price on Carbon with a Tax (Accessed April 3, 2015). http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/Climate/background-note_carbon-tax.pdf.
102. Zhen C., Finkelstein E.A., Nonnemaker J.M., Karns S.A., Todd J.E. Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 96(1):1-25.