Interaction envelope: Local spatial representations of objects at all scales in scene-selective regions

NeuroImage

Volumn 122, Issue , 2015, Pages 408-416

  Bainbridge, Wilma Alice ^a   Oliva, Aude ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

fMRI; Interaction envelope; Parahippocampal place area; Scene selective regions; Spatial object properties

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SCENE SELECTIVE REGION; EXTRASTRIATE BODY AREA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERAL OCCIPITAL COMPLEX; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; OCCIPITAL PLACE AREA; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL PLACE AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941217786     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.066     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amit E., Trope Y., Mehudar E., Yovel G. Activation of ventral visual cortex supports distance representation. Brain Cogn. 2012, 80:201-213.
2. Auger S.D., Mullally S.L., Maguire E.A. Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks. PLoS ONE 2012, e43620.
3. Bar M., Aminoff E. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 2003, 38:347-358.
4. Bracci S., Peelen M. Body and object effectors: the organization of object representations in high-level visual cortex reflects body-object interactions. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:18247-18258.
5. Bracci S., Ietswaart M., Peelen M.V., Cavina-Pratesi C. Dissociable neural responses to hands and non-hand body parts in the extrastriate visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:3389-3397.
6. Cate A.D., Goodale M.A., Köhler S. The role of apparent size in building- and object-specific regions of ventral visual cortex. Brain Res. 2011, 1388:109-122.
7. Dilks D.D., Julian J.B., Paunov A.M., Kanwisher N. The occipital place area (OPA) is causally and selectively involved in scene perception. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:1331-1336.
8. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 2001, 293:2470-2473.
9. Epstein R. The cortical basis of visual scene processing. Vis. Cogn. 2005, 12:954-978.
10. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
11. Epstein R., Graham K.S., Downing P.E. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 2003, 37:865-876.
12. Formisano E., Di Salle F., Goebel R. Fundamentals of data analysis methods in fMRI. Advanced Image Processing in Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006, 481-503. CRC Press, USA. L. Landini, V. Positano, M.F. Santarelli (Eds.).
13. Ganaden R.E., Mullin C.R., Steeves J.K. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the transverse occipital sulcus affects scene but not object processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:961-968.
14. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992, 15:20-25.
15. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17:2735-2740.
16. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
17. Harel A., Kravitz D.J., Baker C. Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex. PNAS 2014, 111:E962-E971.
18. Haxby J.V., Grady C.L., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M., Carson R.E., Herscovitch P., Schapiro M.B., Rapoport S.I. Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88:1621-1625.
19. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:849-937.
20. Janzen G., van Turennout M. Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:673-677.
21. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
22. Kim J.G., Biederman I., Lescroart M.D., Hayworth K.J. Adaptation to objects in the lateral occipital complex (LOC): shape or semantics?. Vis. Res. 2009, 49:2297-2305.
23. Konkle T., Oliva A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipito-temporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114-1124.
24. Kourtzi A., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 2001, 293:1506-1509.
25. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
26. Mullally S.L., Maguire E.A. A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:7441-7449.
27. Mullin C.R., Steeves J.K. TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:4174-4184.
28. Park S., Chun M.M. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in scene perception. Neuroimage 2009, 2009:1747-1756.
29. Park S., Brady T.F., Greene M.R., Oliva A. Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the PPA and LOC in representing real-world scenes. J. Neurosci. 2011, 34:1333-1340.
30. Park S., Konkle T., Oliva A. Parametric coding of the size and clutter of natural scenes in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 10.1093/cercor/bht418.
31. Rajimehr R., Devaney K.J., Bilenko N.Y., Young J.C., Tootell R.B.H. The "parahippocampal place area" responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1000608.
32. Torralba A., Oliva A. Statistics of natural image categories. Network 2003, 14:391-412.
33. Troiani V., Stigliani A., Smith M.E., Epstein R.A. Multiple object properties drive scene-selective regions. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 10.1093/cercor/bhs364.
34. Wohlschläger A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vis. Res. 2000, 40:925-930.
35. Wolfe J.M., Võ M.L.-H., Evans K.K., Greene M.R. Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:77-84.