Measuring self-esteem after spinal cord injury: Development, validation and psychometric characteristics of the SCI-QOL Self-esteem item bank and short form

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 377-385

  Kalpakjian, Claire Z ^a   Tate, Denise G ^a   Kisala, Pamela A ^b   Tulsky, David S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c KESSLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Patient outcomes assessment; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Self assessment; Self concept; Self esteem; Spinal cord injuries

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COPING BEHAVIOR; EFFECT SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SELF ESTEEM; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SPINAL CORD INJURY QUALITY OF LIFE; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84941206547     PISSN: 10790268     EISSN: 20457723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000014     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Heppner W, Kernis M. High self-esteem: multiple forms and their outcomes. In: Schwartz S, Luyckx K, Vignoles V, eds. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, Vols 1 and 2. New York, New York: Springer; 2011:329-355.
2. James W. Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt (reprinted by Thoemmes Press, 1999); 1890.
3. Rosenberg M. The association of self-esteem and anxiety. J Psychiatr Res 1962;1(2):135-52.
4. Brown JD, Dutton KA, Cook KE. From the top down: self-esteem and self-evaluation. Cogn Emot 2001;15(5):615-31.
5. Brown JD, Marshall MA. Self-esteem and emotion: some thoughts about feelings. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001;27(5):575-84.
6. Hermann AD, Leonardelli GJ, Arkin RM. Self-doubt and self-esteem: a threat from within. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002;28(3):395-408.
7. Brown JD. High self-esteem buffers negative feedback: once more with feeling. Cogn Emot 2010;24(8):1389-404.
8. Keppel CC, Crowe SF. Changes to body image and self-esteem following stroke in young adults. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2000;10(1):15-31.
9. Miyahara M, Piek J. Self-esteem of children and adolescents with physical disabilities: quantitative evidence from meta-analysis. J Dev Phys Disabil 2006;18(3):219-34.
10. Cooper-Evans S, Alderman N, Knight C, Oddy M. Self-esteem as a predictor of psychological distress after severe acquired brain injury: an exploratory study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008;18(5-6):607-26.
11. Juth V, Smyth JM, Santuzzi AM. How do you feel? - Self-esteem predicts affect, stress, social interaction, and symptom severity during daily life in patients with chronic illness. J Health Psychol 2008;13(7):884-94.
12. Kiera S, Stachow R, Petermann F, Tiedjen U. Medical inpatient rehabilitation influences on self-esteem and self-efficacy of chronically III adolescents. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2010;49(4):248-55.
13. Vickery CD, Evans CC, Lee JE, Sepehri A, Jabeen LN. Multilevel modeling of self-esteem change during acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2009;54(4):372-80.
14. Peter C, Muller R, Cieza A, Geyh S. Psychological resources in spinal cord injury: a systematic literature review. Spinal Cord 2012;50(3):188-201.
15. Marini I, Rogers L, Slate JR, Vines C. Self-esteem differences among persons with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Couns Bull 1995; 38(3):198-206.
16. van Leeuwen CMC, Kraaijeveld S, Lindeman E, Post MWM. Associations between psychological factors and quality of life ratings in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 2012;50(3):174-87.
17. Geyh S, Nick E, Stirnimann D, Ehrat S, Michel F, Peter C, et al. Self-efficacy and self-esteem as predictors of participation in spinal cord injury-an ICF-based study. Spinal Cord 2012;50(9):699-706.
18. Buunk BP. Comparison direction and comparison dimension among disabled individuals: toward a refined conceptualization of social comparison under stress. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995; 21(4):316-30.
19. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum Relat 1954;7(2):117-40.
20. Schulz R, Decker S. Long-term adjustment to physical disability: the role of social support, perceived control and self-blame. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;48:1162-72.
21. Buunk AP, Zurriaga R, Gonzalez P. Social comparison, coping and depression in people with spinal cord injury. Psychol Health 2006;21(6):791-807.
22. Neugebauer A, Katz PP, Pasch LA. Effect of valued activity disability, social comparisons, and satisfaction with ability on depressive symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis. Health Psychol 2003;22(3):253-62.
23. Chang CH, Ferris DL, Johnson RE, Rosen CC, Tan JA. Core selfevaluations: a review and evaluation of the literature. Jr Management 2012;38(1):81-128.
24. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Revised edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press; 1989.
25. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):257-69.
26. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Choi SW, Gershon R, Heinemann AW, et al. Methodology for the development and calibration of the SCI-QOL item banks. J Spinal Cord Med 2015;38(3):270-87.
27. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate D, Heinemann AW, Amtmann D, et al. Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):S44-51.
28. Cella D, Nowinski C, Peterman A, Victorson D, Miller D, Lai JS, et al. The neurology quality-of-life measurement initiative. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(10, Suppl.):S28-36.
29. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
30. Eremenco SL, Cella D, Arnold BJ. A comprehensive method for the translation and cross-cultural validation of health status questionnaires. Eval Health Prof 2005;28(2):212-32.
31. MetaMetrics. The LEXILE framework for reading. Durham, NC: MetaMetrics Inc; 1995.
32. American Spinal Injury Association. Reference manual for the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association; 2003.
33. Samejima F, van der Liden W, Hambleton R. The graded response model. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1996, p. 85-100.
34. Choi SW, Gibbons LE, Crane PK. lordif: an R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item tesponse theory and Monte Carlo simulations. J Stat Softw 2011;39(8):1-30.
35. Gershon R, Rothrock NE, Hanrahan RT, Jansky LJ, Harniss M, Riley W. The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: assessment Center. Qual Life Res 2010;19(5):677-85.
36. Rosenberg M, Schooler C, Schoenbach C, Rosenberg F. Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes. Am Sociol Rev 1995;60:141-56.