Reprogramming Roadblocks Are System Dependent

Stem Cell Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 350-364

  Chantzoura, Eleni ^a   Skylaki, Stavroula ^b   Menendez, Sergio ^a   Kim, Shin Il ^c   Johnsson, Anna ^d   Linnarsson, Sten ^d   Woltjen, Knut ^c,e   Chambers, Ian ^a   Kaji, Keisuke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL SURFACE MARKER; HERMES ANTIGEN; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR ADAPTOR MOLECULE 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; UVOMORULIN; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR; NANOG PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL COUNT; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL TRANSFORMATION; COLONY FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRON; MESENCHYMAL TO EPITHELIAL TRANSITION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PHENOTYPE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RNA SEQUENCE; TRANSPOSON; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIAL MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; GENETICS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; METABOLISM;

ANIMALS; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EPITHELIAL-MESENCHYMAL TRANSITION; FIBROBLASTS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; KRUPPEL-LIKE TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; NANOG HOMEOBOX PROTEIN;

EID: 84941171969     PISSN: 22136711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Y. Benjamini, and Y. Hochberg Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 57 1995 289 300
2. Y. Buganim, D.A. Faddah, A.W. Cheng, E. Itskovich, S. Markoulaki, K. Ganz, S.L. Klemm, A. van Oudenaarden, and R. Jaenisch Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase Cell 150 2012 1209 1222
3. B.W. Carey, S. Markoulaki, J. Hanna, K. Saha, Q. Gao, M. Mitalipova, and R. Jaenisch Reprogramming of murine and human somatic cells using a single polycistronic vector Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 2009 157 162
4. B.W. Carey, S. Markoulaki, C. Beard, J. Hanna, and R. Jaenisch Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells Nat. Methods 7 2010 56 59
5. B.W. Carey, S. Markoulaki, J.H. Hanna, D.A. Faddah, Y. Buganim, J. Kim, K. Ganz, E.J. Steine, J.P. Cassady, M.P. Creyghton, and et al. Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells Cell Stem Cell 9 2011 588 598
6. A.C. Carter, B.N. Davis-Dusenbery, K. Koszka, J.K. Ichida, and K. Eggan Nanog-independent reprogramming to iPSCs with canonical factors Stem Cell Reports 2 2014 119 126
7. I. Chambers, D. Colby, M. Robertson, J. Nichols, S. Lee, S. Tweedie, and A. Smith Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells Cell 113 2003 643 655
8. I. Chambers, J. Silva, D. Colby, J. Nichols, B. Nijmeijer, M. Robertson, J. Vrana, K. Jones, L. Grotewold, and A. Smith Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development Nature 450 2007 1230 1234
9. R.L. dos Santos, L. Tosti, A. Radzisheuskaya, I.M. Caballero, K. Kaji, B. Hendrich, and J.C. Silva MBD3/NuRD facilitates induction of pluripotency in a context-dependent manner Cell Stem Cell 15 2014 102 110
10. N. Festuccia, R. Osorno, F. Halbritter, V. Karwacki-Neisius, P. Navarro, D. Colby, F. Wong, A. Yates, S.R. Tomlinson, and I. Chambers Esrrb is a direct Nanog target gene that can substitute for Nanog function in pluripotent cells Cell Stem Cell 11 2012 477 490
11. M. Fidalgo, F. Faiola, C.F. Pereira, J. Ding, A. Saunders, J. Gingold, C. Schaniel, I.R. Lemischka, J.C. Silva, and J. Wang Zfp281 mediates Nanog autorepression through recruitment of the NuRD complex and inhibits somatic cell reprogramming Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 2012 16202 16207
12. L. Haenebalcke, S. Goossens, P. Dierickx, S. Bartunkova, J. D'Hont, K. Haigh, T. Hochepied, D. Wirth, A. Nagy, and J.J. Haigh The ROSA26-iPSC mouse: A conditional, inducible, and exchangeable resource for studying cellular (De)differentiation Cell Rep. 3 2013 335 341
13. J. Hanna, K. Saha, B. Pando, J. van Zon, C.J. Lengner, M.P. Creyghton, A. van Oudenaarden, and R. Jaenisch Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration Nature 462 2009 595 601
14. S.M. Hussein, M.C. Puri, P.D. Tonge, M. Benevento, A.J. Corso, J.L. Clancy, R. Mosbergen, M. Li, D.S. Lee, N. Cloonan, and et al. Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency Nature 516 2014 198 206
15. S. Islam, U. Kjällquist, A. Moliner, P. Zajac, J.B. Fan, P. Lönnerberg, and S. Linnarsson Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq Genome Res. 21 2011 1160 1167
16. K. Kaji, K. Norrby, A. Paca, M. Mileikovsky, P. Mohseni, and K. Woltjen Virus-free induction of pluripotency and subsequent excision of reprogramming factors Nature 458 2009 771 775
17. S.I. Kim, F. Oceguera-Yanez, R. Hirohata, S. Linker, K. Okita, Y. Yamada, T. Yamamoto, S. Yamanaka, and K. Woltjen KLF4 N-terminal variance modulates induced reprogramming to pluripotency Stem Cell Reports 4 2015 727 743
18. M. Krzywinski, J. Schein, I. Birol, J. Connors, R. Gascoyne, D. Horsman, S.J. Jones, and M.A. Marra Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics Genome Res. 19 2009 1639 1645
19. R. Li, J. Liang, S. Ni, T. Zhou, X. Qing, H. Li, W. He, J. Chen, F. Li, Q. Zhuang, and et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts Cell Stem Cell 7 2010 51 63
20. U. Ligges, and M. Maechler scatterplot3d - an R package for visualizing multivariate data J. Stat. Softw. 8 2003 1 20
21. L. Liu, Y. Xu, M. He, M. Zhang, F. Cui, L. Lu, M. Yao, W. Tian, C. Benda, Q. Zhuang, and et al. Transcriptional pause release is a rate-limiting step for somatic cell reprogramming Cell Stem Cell 15 2014 574 588
22. K. Mitsui, Y. Tokuzawa, H. Itoh, K. Segawa, M. Murakami, K. Takahashi, M. Maruyama, M. Maeda, and S. Yamanaka The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells Cell 113 2003 631 642
23. P. Navarro, N. Festuccia, D. Colby, A. Gagliardi, N.P. Mullin, W. Zhang, V. Karwacki-Neisius, R. Osorno, D. Kelly, M. Robertson, and I. Chambers OCT4/SOX2-independent Nanog autorepression modulates heterogeneous Nanog gene expression in mouse ES cells EMBO J. 31 2012 4547 4562
24. K. Nishimura, T. Kato, C. Chen, L. Oinam, E. Shiomitsu, D. Ayakawa, M. Ohtaka, A. Fukuda, M. Nakanishi, and K. Hisatake Manipulation of KLF4 expression generates iPSCs paused at successive stages of reprogramming Stem Cell Reports 3 2014 915 929
25. J. O'Malley, S. Skylaki, K.A. Iwabuchi, E. Chantzoura, T. Ruetz, A. Johnsson, S.R. Tomlinson, S. Linnarsson, and K. Kaji High-resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells Nature 499 2013 88 91
26. K. Okita, M. Nakagawa, H. Hyenjong, T. Ichisaka, and S. Yamanaka Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors Science 322 2008 949 953
27. J.M. Polo, E. Anderssen, R.M. Walsh, B.A. Schwarz, C.M. Nefzger, S.M. Lim, M. Borkent, E. Apostolou, S. Alaei, J. Cloutier, and et al. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells Cell 151 2012 1617 1632
28. P. Samavarchi-Tehrani, A. Golipour, L. David, H.K. Sung, T.A. Beyer, A. Datti, K. Woltjen, A. Nagy, and J.L. Wrana Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming Cell Stem Cell 7 2010 64 77
29. B.A. Schwarz, O. Bar-Nur, J.C. Silva, and K. Hochedlinger Nanog is dispensable for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells Curr. Biol. 24 2014 347 350
30. J. Silva, J. Nichols, T.W. Theunissen, G. Guo, A.L. van Oosten, O. Barrandon, J. Wray, S. Yamanaka, I. Chambers, and A. Smith Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state Cell 138 2009 722 737
31. C.A. Sommer, M. Stadtfeld, G.J. Murphy, K. Hochedlinger, D.N. Kotton, and G. Mostoslavsky Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette Stem Cells 27 2009 543 549
32. M. Stadtfeld, N. Maherali, M. Borkent, and K. Hochedlinger A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells Nat. Methods 7 2010 53 55
33. H.T. Stuart, A.L. van Oosten, A. Radzisheuskaya, G. Martello, A. Miller, S. Dietmann, J. Nichols, and J.C. Silva NANOG amplifies STAT3 activation and they synergistically induce the naive pluripotent program Curr. Biol. 24 2014 340 346
34. K. Takahashi, and S. Yamanaka Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors Cell 126 2006 663 676
35. K. Yusa, R. Rad, J. Takeda, and A. Bradley Generation of transgene-free induced pluripotent mouse stem cells by the piggyBac transposon Nat. Methods 6 2009 363 369
36. K. Yusa, L. Zhou, M.A. Li, A. Bradley, and N.L. Craig A hyperactive piggyBac transposase for mammalian applications Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 2011 1531 1536