Forest canopy-structure characterization: A data-driven approach

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 358, Issue , 2015, Pages 48-61

  Leiterer, Reik ^a   Furrer, Reinhard ^a   Schaepman, Michael E ^a   Morsdorf, Felix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

ALS; Functional diversity; LiDAR; Multi scale; Remote sensing; Vegetation

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FORESTRY; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; TURPENTINE; VEGETATION;

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; ALS; AUTOMATIC DETERMINATION; BIO-PHYSICAL VARIABLES; CLASSIFICATION APPROACH; FOREST CANOPY STRUCTURE; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; MULTI-SCALE;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

AIRBORNE SENSOR; AUTOMATION; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOPHYSICS; CALIBRATION; CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENERGY FLUX; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOREST CANOPY; FUNCTIONAL CHANGE; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; LASER METHOD; LIDAR; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84941074284     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Agamennoni, G., 2013. Bayesian Clustering with Outliers and Missing Values. Technical Report ACFR-TR-2013-001. Australian Centre for Field Robotics, University of Sydney, NSW Australia.
2. Ahokas, E., Yu, X., Oksanen, J., Kaartinen, H., Model, D.T., 2005. Optimization of the Scanning Angle for Countrywide Laser Scanning. ISPRS WG III/3, III/4, V/3 Workshop "Laser scanning 2005". Enschede, the Netherlands, pp. 115-119 (September 12-14).
3. Asner G.P., Mascaro J., Muller-Landau H.C., Vieilledent G., Vaudry R., Rasamoelina M., Hall J.S., van Breugel M. A universal airborne LiDAR approach for tropical forest carbon mapping. Oecologia 2012, 168(4):1147-1160.
4. Bonan G.B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 2008, 320(5882):1444-1449.
5. Betts A.K., Ball J.H., McCaughey J.H. Near-surface climate in the boreal forest. J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos. 2001, 106(D24):33529-33541.
6. Breidenbach J., Næsset E., Lien V., Gobakken T., Solberg S. Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(4):911-924.
7. Chen X.T., Disney M.I., Lewis P., Armston J., Han J.T., Li J.C. Sensitivity of direct canopy gap fraction retrieval from airborne waveform lidar to topography and survey characteristics. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 143:15-25.
8. Christman Z.J., Rogan J. Error propagation in raster data integration: impacts on landscape composition and configuration. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2012, 78(6):617-624.
9. Dial R., Bloodworh B., Lee A., Boyne P., Heys J. The distribution of free space and its relation to canopy composition at six forest sites. Forest Sci. 2004, 50:312-325.
10. Disney M.I., Kalogirou V., Lewis P., Prieto-Blanco A., Hancock S., Pfeifer M. Simulating the impact of discrete-return lidar system and survey characteristics over young conifer and broadleaf forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(7):1546-1560.
11. Disney M., Lewis P., Saich P. 3D modeling of forest canopy structure for remote sensing simulations in the optical and microwave domains. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 100(1):114-132.
12. Ene L., Næsset E., Gobakken T. Single tree detection in heterogeneous boreal forests using airborne laser scanning and area-based stem number estimates. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2012, 33(16):5171-5193.
13. Eugster W., Zeyer K., Zeeman M., Michna P., Zingg A., Buchmann N., Emmenegger L. Nitrous oxide net exchange in a beech dominated mixed forest in Switzerland measured with a quantum cascade laser spectrometer. Biogeosci. Discussion 2007, 4(2):1167-1200.
14. Evans J.S., Hudak A.T. A multiscale curvature algorithm for classifying discrete return LiDAR in forested environments. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2007, 45(4):1029-1038.
15. Everett R., Baumgartner D., Ohlson P., Schellhaas R. Defining and quantifying canopy strata. Northwest Sci. 2008, 82(1):48-64.
16. Ferraz A., Bretar F., Jacquemoud S., Gonçalves G., Pereira L., Tomé M., Soares P. 3-D mapping of a multi-layered Mediterranean forest using ALS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 121:210-223.
17. Ferretti M. Harmonizing forest inventories and forest condition monitoring - the rise or the fall of harmonized forest condition monitoring in Europe?. IForest 2010, 3:1-4.
18. Foody G.M. Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(10):2271-2285.
19. Foody G.M. Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 2004, 70(5):627-633.
20. Frazer G.W., Wulder M.A., Niemann K.O. Simulation and quantification of the fine-scale spatial pattern and heterogeneity of forest canopy structure: a lacunarity-based method designed for analysis of continuous canopy heights. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 214(1-3):65-90.
21. Gao T., Hedblom M., Emilsson T., Nielsen A.B. The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator. For. Ecol. Manage. 2014, 330:82-93.
22. Gasparini P., Di Cosmo L., Cenni E., Pompei E., Ferretti M. Towards the harmonization between national forest inventory and forest condition monitoring. Consistency of plot allocation and effect of tree selection methods on sample statistics in Italy. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185(7):6155-6171.
23. Glennie C. Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LIDAR systems. J. Appl. Geodesy 2007, 1:147-157.
24. Graf R., Mathys L., Bollmann K. Habitat assessment for forest dwelling species using LiDAR remote sensing: capercaillie in the Alps. For. Ecol. Manage. 2009, 257(1):160-167.
25. Haara A., Leskinen P. The assessment of the uncertainty of updated stand-level inventory data. Silva Fennica 2009, 43(1):87-112.
26. Hall F.G., Bergen K., Blair J.B., Dubayah R., Houghton R., Hurtt G., Kellndorfer J., Lefsky M., Ranson J., Saatchi S., Shugart H.H., Wickland D. Characterizing 3D vegetation structure from space: mission requirements. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115(11):2753-2775.
27. Hawbaker T.J., Gobakken T., Lesak A., Trømborg E., Contrucci K., Radeloff V. Light detection and ranging-based measures of mixed hardwood forest structure. Forest Sci. 2010, 56(3):313-326.
28. Hayashi R., Weiskittel A., Sader S. Assessing the feasibility of low-density LiDAR for stand inventory attribute predictions in complex and managed forests of Northern Maine, USA. Forests 2014, 5(2):363-383.
29. Hengl T. Finding the right pixel size. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32(9):1283-1298.
30. Herrera J.M., García D. Effects of forest fragmentation on seed dispersal and seedling establishment in ornithochorous trees. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24(4):1089-1098.
31. Holmgren J., Nilsson M., Olsson H. Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 29(5):623-632.
32. Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H., Leckie D., Gougeon F., Yu X., Maltamo M. Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29(5):1339-1366.
33. Ishii H.T., Tanabe S.-I., Hiura T. Exploring the relationships among canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. Forest Sci. 2004, 50(3):342-355.
34. Jackson R.B., Jobbágy E.G., Avissar R., Roy S.B., Barrett D.J., Cook C.W., Farley K.A., Le Maitre D.C., McCarl B.A., Murray B.C. Atmospheric science: trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 2005, 310(5756):1944-1947.
35. Jakubowski M.K., Guo Q., Kelly M. Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 130:245-253.
36. Joerg P.C., Morsdorf F., Zemp M. Uncertainty assessment of multi-temporal airborne laser scanning data: a case study on an Alpine glacier. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 127:118-129.
37. Jones T.G., Coops N.C., Sharma T. Assessing the utility of LiDAR to differentiate among vegetation structural classes. Remote Sens. Lett. 2012, 3(3):231-238.
38. Jonsson M., Wardle D.A. Structural equation modelling reveals plant-community drivers of carbon storage in boreal forest ecosystems. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6(1):116-119.
39. Kaartinen H., Hyyppä J., Yu X., Vastaranta M., Hyyppä H., Kukko A., Holopainen M., Heipke C., Hirschmugl M., Morsdorf F., Næsset E., Pitkänen J., Popescu S., Solberg S., Wolf B.M., Wu J.C. An international comparison of individual tree detection and extraction using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. 2012, 4(4):950-974.
40. Kane R., Bakker J.D., McGaughey R.J., Lutz J.A., Gersonde R.F., Franklin J.F. Examining conifer canopy structural complexity across forest ages and elevations with LiDAR data. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40(4):774-787.
41. Kayes L.J., Tinker D.B. Forest structure and regeneration following a mountain pine beetle epidemic in southeastern Wyoming. For. Ecol. Manage. 2012, 263:57-66.
42. Kendall M.G., Gibbons J.D. Rank Correlation Methods 1990, Oxford University Press, USA, (ISBN-13: 978-0195208375, 272 pages). fifth ed.
43. Kim S., McGaughey R.J., Andersen H.-E., Schreuder G. Tree species differentiation using intensity data derived from leaf-on and leaf-off airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113(8):1575-1586.
44. Ko C., Sohn G., Remmel T.K. The Impact of Lidar Point Density on Classifying Tree Genus: using Geometric Features and Vertical Profile Features 2012, SilviLaser, Vancouver, Canada, (September 16-19, pp. 67-74).
45. Korpela I., Ørka H.O., Maltamo M., Tokola T., Hyyppä J. Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR - effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type. Silva Fennica 2010, 44(2):319-339.
46. Larsen M., Eriksson M., Descombes X., Perrin G., Brandtberg T., Gougeon F.A. Comparison of six individual tree crown detection algorithms evaluated under varying forest conditions. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32(20):5827-5852.
47. Leiterer, R., Morsdorf, F., Torabzadeh, H., Schaepman, M.E., Muecke, W., Pfeifer, N., Hollaus, M., 2012. A voxel-based approach for canopy structure characterization using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. In: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp. 3399-3402 (art. no. 6350691).
48. Lim K., Hopkinson C., Treitz P. Examining the effects of sampling point densities on laser canopy height and density metrics. Forestry Chronicle 2008, 84(6):876-885.
49. Lindberg E., Olofsson K., Holmgren J., Olsson H. Estimation of 3D vegetation structure from waveform and discrete return airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118(4):151-161.
50. Lindenmayer D.B., Franklin J.F., Fischer J. General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 131(3):433-445.
51. Mallet C., Bretar F. Full-waveform topographic lidar: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 2009, 64(1):1-16.
52. Maltamo M., Eerikäinen K., Packalén P., Hyyppä J. Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics. Forestry 2006, 79(2):217-229.
53. Maltamo M., Packalén P., Yu X., Eerikäinen K., Hyyppä J., Pitkänen J. Identifying and quantifying structural characteristics of heterogeneous boreal forests using laser scanner data. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 216(1-3):41-50.
54. Marceau D.J., Hay G.J. Remote sensing contributions to the scale issue. Can. J. Remote Sens. 1999, 25(4):357-366.
55. McElhinny C., Gibbons P., Brack C., Bauhus J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 218(1-3):1-24.
56. McKinley D.C., Ryan M.G., Birdsey R.A., Giardina C.P., Harmon M.E., Heath L.S., Houghton R.A., Jackson R.B., Morrison J.F., Murray B.C., Pataki D.E., Skog K.E. A synthesis of current knowledge on forests and carbon storage in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21(6):1902-1924.
57. Montaghi A. Effect of scanning angle on vegetation metrics derived from a nationwide Airborne Laser Scanning acquisition. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 39(SUPPL.1):S152-S173.
58. Morsdorf F., Mårell A., Koetz B., Cassagne N., Pimont F., Rigolot E., Allgöwer B. Discrimination of vegetation strata in a multi-layered Mediterranean forest ecosystem using height and intensity information derived from airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(7):1403-1415.
59. Morsdorf F., Nichol C., Malthus T., Woodhouse I.H. Assessing forest structural and physiological information content of multi-spectral LiDAR waveforms by radiative transfer modelling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113(10):2152-2163.
60. Morsdorf F., Meier E., Kötz B., Itten K.I., Dobbertin M., Allgöwer B. LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 92(3):353-362.
61. Mücke, W., Briese, C., Hollaus, M., 2010. Terrain echo probability assignment based on full waveform airborne laser scanning observables. In: Wagner, W., Székely, B. (Eds.), ISPRS TC VII Symposium -100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5-7, 2010, IAPRS, XXXVIII (7A), pp. 157-162.
62. Nadkarni N.M., McIntosh A.C.S., Cushing J.B. A framework to categorize forest structure concepts. For. Ecol. Manage. 2008, 256(5):872-882.
63. Næsset E. Assessing sensor effects and effects of leaf-off and leaf-on canopy conditions on biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 98:356-370.
64. Næsset E. Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser. Scand. J. For. Res. 2004, 19(2):164-179.
65. Nieschulze J., Zimmermann R., Börner A., Schulze E.-D. An assessment of forest canopy structure by LiDAR: derivation and stability of canopy structure parameters across forest management types. Forstarchiv 2012, 83(6):95-209.
66. O'Hara K., Nagel L. A functional comparison of productivity in even-aged and multiaged stands: a synthesis of Pinus ponderosa. Forest Sci. 2006, 52:290-303.
67. Ørka H.O., Næsset E., Bollandsås O.M. Effects of different sensors and leaf-on and leaf-off canopy conditions on echo distributions and individual tree properties derived from airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114(7):1445-1461.
68. Pan Y., Birdsey R.A., Phillips O.L., Jackson R.B. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world's forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013, 44:593-622.
69. Parker G.G., Brown M.J. Forest canopy stratification-is it useful?. Am. Nat. 2000, 155(4):473-484.
70. Pirotti F. Analysis of full-waveform LiDAR data for forestry applications: a review of investigations and methods. iForest - Biogeosci. Forestry 2011, 4(3):100-106.
71. Popescu S.C. Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne Lidar. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31:646-655.
72. Purves D., Pacala S. Predictive models of forest dynamics. Science 2008, 320(5882):1452-1453.
73. Riaño D., Meier E., Allgöwer B., Chuvieco E., Ustin S.L. Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86(2):177-186.
74. RIEGL, 2015. Products. Airborne Scanning. Datasheets. <> (accessed 04.06.15). http://www.riegl.com/.
75. Rippa S. An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation. Adv. Comput. Math. 1999, 11(2-3):193-210.
76. Roberts J., Tesfamichael S., Gebreslasie M., Van Aardt J., Ahmed F. Forest structural assessment using remote sensing technologies: an overview of the current state of the art. Southern Hemisphere Forestry J. 2007, 69(3):183-203.
77. Ross A.N. Boundary-layer flow within and above a forest canopy of variable density. Quart. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 138(666):1259-1272.
78. Ruxton G.D. The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17(4):688-690.
79. Saunders S.C., Chen J., Drummer T.D., Gustafson E.J., Brosofske K.D. Identifying scales of pattern in ecological data: a comparison of lacunarity, spectral and wavelet analyses. Ecol. Complex. 2005, 2(1):87-105.
80. Schneider F.D., Leiterer R., Morsdorf F., Gastellu-Etchegorry J.P., Lauret N., Pfeifer N., Schaepman M.E. Simulating imaging spectrometer data: 3D forest modeling based on LiDAR and in situ data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 152:235-250.
81. Shugart H.H., Saatchi S., Hall F.G. Importance of structure and its measurement in quantifying function of forest ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. 2010, 115(4):1-16.
82. Sierra C.A., Loescher H.W., Harmon M.E., Richardson A.D., Hollinger D.Y., Perakis S.S. Interannual variation of carbon fluxes from three contrasting evergreen forests: the role of forest dynamics and climate. Ecology 2009, 90(10):2711-2723.
83. Spies T.A. Forest structure: a key to the ecosystem. Northwest Sci. 1998, 72(2):34-36.
84. Tang H., Dubayah R., Brolly M., Ganguly S., Zhang G. Large-scale retrieval of leaf area index and vertical foliage profile from the spaceborne waveform lidar (GLAS/ICESat). Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 154:8-18.
85. Torabzadeh, H., Leiterer, R., Tuia, D., Schaepman, M.E., Morsdorf, F., 2015. 3D iterative tree crown delineation in a multi-layered forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, submitted for publication.
86. Treitz P., Lim K., Woods M., Pitt D., Nesbitt D., Etheridge D. LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in Ontario, Canada. Remote Sens. 2012, 4(4):830-848.
87. van Leeuwen M., Nieuwenhuis M. Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. Eur. J. Forest Res. 2010, 129(4):749-770.
88. Vastaranta M., Kankare V., Holopainen M., Yu X., Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H. Combination of individual tree detection and area-based approach in imputation of forest variables using airborne laser data. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 2012, 67(1):73-79.
89. Villikka M., Packalén P., Maltamo M. The suitability of leaf-off airborne laser scanning data in an area-based forest inventory of coniferous and deciduous trees. Silva Fennica 2012, 46(1):99-110.
90. Wagner W., Hollaus M., Briese C., Ducic V. 3D vegetation mapping using small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanners. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29(5):1433-1452.
91. Wagner W., Ullrich A., Ducic V., Melzer T., Studnicka N. Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner. ISPRS J. Photogram. Remote Sens. 2006, 60(2):100-112.
92. Wang Y., Weinacker H., Koch B. A Lidar point cloud based procedure for vertical canopy structure analysis and 3D single tree modelling in forest. Sensors 2008, 8(6):3938-3951.
93. White, J.C., Wulder, M.A., Varhola, A., Vastaranta, M., Coops, N.C., Cook, B.D., Pitt, D., Woods, M., 2013. A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. Information Report FI-X-010, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC.
94. Whitehurst A.S., Swatantran A., Blair J.B., Hofton M.A., Dubayah R. Characterization of canopy layering in forested ecosystems using full waveform lidar. Remote Sens. 2013, 5:2014-2036.
95. Wilkes P., Jones S.D., Suarez L., Haywood A., Woodgate W., Soto-Berelov M., Mellor A., Skidmore A.K. Understanding the effects of ALS pulse density for metric retrieval across diverse forest types. Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 2015, 81(8):33-43.
96. Wing B.M., Ritchie M.W., Boston K., Cohen W.B., Gitelman A., Olsen M.J. Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 124:730-741.
97. Wu J., Shen W., Sun W., Tueller P.T. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol. 2002, 17(8):761-782.
98. Wulder M.A., Coops N.C., Hudak A.T., Morsdorf F., Nelson R., Newnham G., Vastaranta M. Status and prospects for LiDAR remote sensing of forested ecosystems. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 39:S1-S5.
99. Wulder M.A., White J.C., Nelson R.F., Næsset E., Ørka H.O., Coops N.C., Hilker T., Bater C.W., Gobakken T. LiDAR sampling for large-area forest characterization: a review. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 121:196-209.
100. Xue B.-L., Kumagai T., Iida S., Nakai T., Matsumoto K., Komatsu H., Otsuki K., Ohta T. Influences of canopy structure and physiological traits on flux partitioning between understory and overstory in an eastern Siberian boreal larch forest. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222(8):1479-1490.
101. Yang R., Friedl M.A. Modeling the effects of three-dimensional vegetation structure on surface radiation and energy balance in boreal forests. J. Geophys. Res. D: Atmos. 2003, 108(16). GCP10-1-GCP10-11.
102. Zhao K., Popescu S., Meng X., Pang Y., Agca M. Characterizing forest canopy structure with LiDAR composite metrics and machine learning. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115(8):1978-1996.
103. Zhao K., Popescu S., Nelson R. Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass: a scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113(1):182-196.
104. Zimble D.A., Evans D.L., Carlson G.C., Parker R.C., Grado S.C., Gerard P.D. Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 87(2-3):171-182.