Patient safety and the control of time in primary care: A review of the French tempos framework by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care

European Journal of General Practice

Volumn 21, Issue , 2015, Pages 45-49

  Brami, Jean ^a   Amalberti, René ^a   Wensing, Michel ^b  

^a Ancien Délégué Général de la Fédération de l'Hospitalisation Privée   (France)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

LINNEAUS collaboration; patient safety; primary care; Time management

Indexed keywords

ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; TIME MANAGEMENT; VALIDITY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; FRANCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TIME FACTOR;

FRANCE; HUMANS; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84941033790     PISSN: 13814788     EISSN: 17511402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043733     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Klemp K, Dovey S, Valderas JM, Rohe J, Godycki-Cwirko M, Elliott P, et al. Developing a patient safety incident classification system for primary care. A literature review and Delphi-survey by the LINNEAUS collaboration for patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015; 21 (S1): 35-38.
2. Vincent C, Adams S, Stanhope N. A framework for the analysis of risk and safety in medicine, Br Med J. 1998; 316: 1154-7.
3. Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R., Zsambok. Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ, USA: Ablex; 1993.
4. Hollnagel E. Time and time again. Theor Issues Ergon. 2002; 3: 143-58.
5. Hoc JM, Amalberti R. Cognitive control dynamics for reaching a satisficing performance in complex dynamic situations, J Cogn Decis Mak. 2007, 1: 22-55.
6. De Keyser V. Time in ergonomics research. Ergonomics 1995; 38: 1639-60.
7. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, Puopolo AL, Yoon C, Brennan TA, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145: 488-96.
8. Jacobson L, Elwyn G, Robling M, Jones RT. Error and safety in primary care: No clear boundaries. Fam Pract. 2003; 20: 237-41.
9. Østbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3: 209-14.
10. Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 1871-94.
11. Singh H, Giardina T, Meyer A, Forjuoh S, Reis M, Thomas EJ. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013: 173; 418-25.
12. Uijen AA, Bosch M, van den Bosch WJ, Bor H, Wensing M, Schers HJ. Heart failure patients experiences with continuity of care and its relation to medication adherence: A cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2012; 20; 13: 86.
13. Amalberti R, Brami J. Tempos management in primary care: A key factor for classifying adverse events, and improving quality and safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21: 729-36.
14. Bruchet C. Analyse des évènements indésirables en médecine générale: étude de 374 plaintes selon deux méthodes: la méthode de Makeham. Paris: Descartes; 2012.
15. Hidalgo Sai A. Analyse des évènements indésirables en médecine générale: étude de 374 plaintes selon deux méthodes: la méthode des Tempos. Paris: Descartes; 2012.
16. Makeham MA, Dovey SM, County M, Kidd MR. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: A pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002; 15;177: 68-72.
17. Sarkar U, Bonacum D, Strull W, Spitzmueller C, Jin N, López A, et al. Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: A multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21: 641-8.