Prenatal Sex Selection and Girls' Well-Being: Evidence from India

Economic Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 587, 2015, Pages 1227-1261

  Hu, Luojia ^a   Schlosser, Analía ^b  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAMILY PLANNING; GENDER RELATIONS; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; WOMENS HEALTH;

INDIA;

EID: 84941024411     PISSN: 00130133     EISSN: 14680297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12259     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abrevaya, J. (2009). 'Are there missing girls in the United States? Evidence from birth data', American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 1(2), pp. 1-34.
2. Almond, D. and Edlund, L. (2008). 'Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States census', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105(15), pp. 5681-82.
3. Almond, D., Edlund, L. and Milligan, K. (2009). 'Son preference and the persistence of culture: evidence from Asian immigrants to Canada', Working Paper 15391, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Almond, D., Li, H. and Meng, L. (2010). 'Son preference and early childhood investments in China', Working Paper, Columbia University.
5. Ananat, E.O., Gruber, J., Levine, B. and Staiger, D. (2009). 'Abortion and selection', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 91(1), pp. 124-36.
6. Arnold, F., Choe, M.K. and Roy, T.K. (1998). 'Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India', Population Studies, vol. 52(3), pp. 301-15.
7. Arnold, F., Kishor, S. and Roy, T.K. (2002). 'Sex-selective abortions in India', Population and Development Review, vol. 28(4), pp. 759-85.
8. Barcellos, S., Carvalho, L. and Lleras-Muney, A. (2014). 'Child gender and parental investment in India: are boys and girls treated differently?', American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 6(1), pp. 157-89.
9. Becker, G. and Tomes, N. (1979). 'An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility', Journal of Political Economy, vol. 87(6), pp. 1153-89.
10. Becker, G. and Tomes, N. (1986). 'Human capital and the rise and fall of families', Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 4(3), pp. S1-39.
11. Ben-Porath, Y. and Welch, F. (1976). 'Do sex preferences matter?', Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 90(2), pp. 285-307.
12. Bhalotra, S. and Cochrane, T. (2010). 'Where have all the young girls gone? Identification of sex selection in India', Discussion Paper 5381, IZA.
13. Bharadwaj, P. and Nelson, L.K. (2010). 'Discrimination begins in the womb: evidence of sex-selective prenatal investments', Working Paper, University of California-San Diego.
14. Bhaskar, V. and Gupta, B. (2007). 'India's development in the era of growth', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 23(2), pp. 135-42.
15. Bhat, M.P.N. (2002). 'On the trail of 'missing' Indian females - II: illusion and reality', Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 37(52), pp. 5244-63.
16. Case, A. and Paxson, C. (2010). 'Causes and consequences of early life health', Demography, vol. 47S, pp. S65-85.
17. Chandran, S.A., Ramachandra, S.S. and Sekhar, P.S. (2011). 'National Family Health Survey-3 reported low full-immunization coverage rates in Andhra Pradesh, India: who is to be blamed?', Journal of Public Health, vol. 33(4), pp. 489-95.
18. Chhabra, R. and Nuna, S.C. (1993). Abortion in India: an Overview. New Delhi: Virendra Printers.
19. Currie, J. (2009). 'Healthy, wealthy and wise: socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development', Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 47(1), pp. 87-122.
20. Das Gupta, M. (1987). 'Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab', Population and Development Review, vol. 13(1), pp. 77-100.
21. Das Gupta, M. and Bhat, P.N.M. (1997). 'Fertility decline and the increased manifestation of sex bias in India', Population Studies, vol. 51(3), pp. 307-15.
22. Deaton, A. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: a Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. Donohue, J.J. and Levitt, S. (2001). 'The impact of legalized abortion on crime', Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 116(2), pp. 379-420.
24. Dreze, J. and Sen, A. (1997). Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Dubuc, S. and Coleman, D. (2007). 'An increase in the sex ratio of births to India-born mothers in England and Wales: evidence for sex-selective abortion', Population and Development Review, vol. 33(2), pp. 383-400.
26. Duggal, R. (2004). 'The political economy of abortion in India: cost and expenditure patterns', Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 12(24), pp. 130-7.
27. Duggal, R. and Ramachandran, V. (2004). 'The abortion assessment project - India: key findings and recommendations', Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 12(24 Suppl), pp. 122-9.
28. Dyson, T. and Moore, M. (1983). 'On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India', Population and Development Review, vol. 9(1), pp. 35-60.
29. Everett, J. (1998). 'Indian feminists debate the efficacy of policy reform: the Maharashtra ban on sex-determination tests', Social Politics, vol. 5(3), pp. 314-37.
30. George, S.M. (1997). 'Female infanticide in Tamil Nadu, India: from recognition back to denial?', Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 5(10), pp. 124-32.
31. George, S.M. (2002). 'Sex selection/determination in India: contemporary developments', Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 10(19), pp. 190-2.
32. George, S.M. (2006). 'Sex ratio in India', Lancet, vol. (9524), pp. 1725-26.
33. Goodkind, D. (1996). 'On substituting sex preference strategies in East Asia: does prenatal sex selection reduces postnatal discrimination?', Population and Development Review, vol. 22(1), pp. 111-25.
34. Hill, K. and Upchurch, D.M. (1995). 'Gender differences in child health: evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys', Population and Development Review, vol. 21(1), pp. 127-51.
35. International Institute for Population Sciences. (1995). National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning): India 1992-93. Bombay: International Institute for Population Sciences.
36. Jacobsen, R., Møller, H. and Mouritsen, A. (1999). 'Natural variation in the human sex ratio', Human Reproduction, vol. 14(12), pp. 3120-5.
37. Jayachandran, S. and Kuziemko, I. (2011). 'Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India', Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 126(3), pp. 1485-538.
38. Jefferey, R., Jefferey, P. and Lyon, A. (1984). 'Female infanticide and amniocentesis', Social Science and Medicine, vol. 19(11), pp. 1207-12.
39. Jensen, R. (2003). 'Equal treatment unequal outcomes? Generating sex inequality through fertility behavior', Working Paper, Harvard University.
40. Khanna, S.K. (1997). 'Traditions and reproductive technology in an urbanizing north Indian village', Social Science & Medicine, vol. 44(2), pp. 171-80.
41. Kishor, S. (1993). 'May god give sons to all: gender and child mortality in India', American Sociological Review, vol. 58(2), pp. 247-65.
42. Kishwar, M. (1995). 'When daughters are unwanted: sex determination tests in India', Manushi, vol. 86(1), pp. 15-22.
43. Krugman, A. (1998). 'Being female can be fatal: an examination of India's ban on pre-natal gender testing', Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 6(1), pp. 215-38.
44. Kulkarni, P.M. (2007). 'Estimation of missing girls at birth and juvenile ages in India', UNFP: Paper commissioned by the United Nations Population Fund.
45. Lin, M.-J., Liu, J.-T. and Qian, N. (2014). 'More missing women, fewer girls dying: the impact of abortion on sex ratios at birth and excess female mortality in Taiwan', Journal of European Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pp. 899-926.
46. Mallik, R. (2003). 'Negative choice' sex determination and sex selective abortion in India', Abortion Assessment Project - India. Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT), Survey 2804 & 2805. Maharashtra, India.
47. Miller, B. (1981). The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [Re-published with a new chapter, 'The girl child in India in the year 2000', pp. 197-217, Oxford University Press, 1997].
48. Miller, B. (1984). 'Daughter neglect, women's work and kinship: Pakistan and Bangladesh compared', Medical Anthropology, vol. 8(2), pp. 109-26.
49. Pande, R.P. (2003). 'Selective gender differentials in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings', Demography, vol. 40(3), pp. 395-418.
50. Petrin, A. and Train, K. (2003). 'Omitted product attributes in discrete choice models', Working Paper 9452, NBER.
51. Portner, C. (2010). 'Sex selective abortion, fertility and birth spacing', mimeo, University of Washington.
52. Ravindran, T.K.S. (2002). 'Gender gaps in research on abortion in India: a critical review of selected studies', New Delhi: The Gender and Reproductive Health Research Initiative. CREA.
53. Retherford, R.D. and Roy, T.K. (2003). 'Factors affecting sex-selective abortion in India and 17 major states', National Family Health Survey Subject Report no. 21.
54. Rose, E. (1999). 'Consumption smoothing and excess of female mortality in rural India', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 81(1), pp. 41-9.
55. Rosenzweig, M.R. and Schultz, P. (1982). 'Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intra-family resource distribution: child survival in rural India', American Economic Review, vol. 72(4), pp. 803-15.
56. Sen, A. (1992). 'Missing women', British Medical Journal, vol. 304(6827), pp. 586-7.
57. Sen, A. (2003). 'Missing women - revisited', British Medical Journal, vol. 327(7427), pp. 1297-9.
58. Shepherd, M.E. (2008). The Selective Abortion in India: The Impact on Child Mortality, Youngstown, New York: Cambria Press.
59. Simmons, G.B., Smucker, C., Bernstein, S. and Jensen, E. (1982). 'Post-neonatal mortality in rural India: implications of an economic model', Demography, vol. 19(3), pp. 371-89.
60. Subramanian, S.V. and Selvaraj, S. (2009). 'Social analysis of sex imbalance in India: before and after the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act', Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, vol. 63(3), pp. 245-52.
61. Sundar, R. (2003). 'Abortion costs and financing - a review', Abortion Assessment Project - India, Mumbai: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes.
62. Timaeus, I., Harries, K. and Fairbairn, F. (1998). 'Can use of health care explain sex differentials in child mortality in the developing world', in (United Nations, ed.), Too Young To Die: Genes Or Gender? pp. 154-78. New York: United Nations Population Division.
63. Visaria, P.M. (1971). 'The sex-ratio of the population of India', Census of India 1961, vol. 1: Monograph 10. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.
64. Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. World Health Organization (1995). 'Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry', WHO Technical Report Series 854.
66. World Health Organization. (2000). 'Effect of breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to infectious diseases in less developed countries: a pooled analysis', Lancet, vol. 355(9202), pp. 451-5.
67. World Health Organization (2003). Global Strategy for Infant and Child Feeding. Geneva: WHO.
68. Yamaguchi, K. (1989). 'A formal theory for male-preferring stopping rules of childbearing: sex differences in birth order and in the number of siblings', Demography, vol. 26(3), pp. 451-65.