A global perspective on the outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Results from the prospective multicenter aospine international study on 479 patients

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 17, 2015, Pages 1322-1328

  Fehlings, Michael G ^a   Ibrahim, Ahmed ^b   Tetreault, Lindsay ^b   Albanese, Vincenzo ^c   Alvarado, Manuel ^d   Arnold, Paul ^e   Barbagallo, Giuseppe ^c   Bartels, Ronald ^f   Bolger, Ciaran ^g   Defino, Helton ^h   Kale, Shashank ⁱ   Massicotte, Eric ^b   Moraes, Osmar ^j   Scerrati, Massimo ^k   Tan, Gamaliel ^l   Tanaka, Masato ^m   Toyone, Tomoaki ⁿ   Yukawa, Yasutsugu ^o   Zhou, Qiang ^p   Zileli, Mehmet ^q   Kopjar, Branko ^r   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^d Hospital San Juan de Dios Caracas   (Venezuela)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

ⁱ ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^j HOSPITAL SANTA MARCELINA   (Brazil)

^k UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

^l TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^m OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁿ TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^o CHUBU ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^p THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^q EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^r UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

30 m walking test; cervical spondylotic myelopathy; complications; international; modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale; multicenter; Neck Disability Index; Nurick score; outcomes; prospective cohort; safety; Short Form 36; surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LAMINOPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODIFIED JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSESSMENT SCALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NURICK SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADICULOPATHY; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SHORT FORM 36V2; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRA; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL OSTEOPHYTOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940994075     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000988     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG,. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013; 19: 409-21
2. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM,. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1986; 11: 521-4
3. Symon L, Lavender P,. The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurology 1967; 17: 117-27
4. Sadasivan KK, Reddy RP, Albright JA,. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Yale J Biol Med 1993; 66: 235-42
5. Kong LD, Meng LC, Wang LF, Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Exp Ther Med 2013; 6: 852-6
6. Clarke E, Robinson PK,. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 1956; 79: 483-510
7. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: current state of the art and future directions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: S1-8
8. Kadanka Z, Mares M, Bednanik J, Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27: 2205-10; discussion 10-1
9. Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD001466
10. Kadanka Z, Bednarik J, Novotny O, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1533-8
11. Cheung WY, Arvinte D, Wong YW, Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy-a prospective study. Int Orthop 2008; 32: 273-8
12. Gok B, Sciubba DM, McLoughlin GS, Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with anterior compression: a review of 67 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 152-7
13. Latimer M, Haden N, Seeley HM, Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16: 545-9
14. Al-Tamimi YZ, Guilfoyle M, Seeley H, Measurement of long-term outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 2552-7
15. Chiles BW III, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999; 44: 762-9; discussion 9-70
16. Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM,. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1995; 82: 745-51
17. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 1651-8
18. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1991; 4: 286-95
19. Nurick S,. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 1972; 95: 101-8
20. Singh A, Crockard HA,. Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet 1999; 354: 370-3
21. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 2010; 10: 469-74
22. Vernon H, Mior S,. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409-15
23. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE,. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-63
24. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 400-17
25. Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J 2009; 9: 802-8
26. Singh A, Tetreault L, Casey A, A summary of assessment tools for patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review on validity, reliability and responsiveness. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (suppl 2): 209-28
27. Schafer JL,. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1997
28. Harrell F, ed. Regression Modeling Strategies With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2001
29. Little R,. Regression with missing X's: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 1992; 88: 125-34
30. Rubin DB,. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveyed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1989
31. Karadimas SK, Erwin WM, Ely CG, Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38: S21-36
32. Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin WM, Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine 2013; 38: S55-67
33. Tetreault LA, Karpova A, Fehlings MG,. Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2015; 24 (suppl 2): 236-51
34. Fehlings MG, Jha NK, Hewson SM, Is surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy cost-effective? A cost-utility analysis based on data from the AOSpine North America prospective CSM study. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 17: 89-93
35. Handa Y, Kubota T, Ishii H, Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 173-9
36. Tetreault LA, Nouri A, Singh A, Predictors of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: a survey of members from AOSpine International. World Neurosurg 2014; 81: 623-33
37. Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 2005; 64: S30-S5
38. Matz P, Anderson P, Holly L, The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 104-11
39. Suri A, Chabbra RPS, Mehta VS, Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 2003; 3: 33-45
40. Jayakumar PN, Kolluri VRS, Vasudev MK, Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine in Asian Indians-a multiracial comparison. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1996; 98: 142-8
41. Matsunaga S, Sakou T,. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine 2012; 37: E309-14
42. Inamasu J, Guiot BH, Sachs DC,. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an update on its biology, epidemiology, and natural history. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 1027-38
43. Ohtsuka K, Terayama K, Yanagihara M, A radiological population study on the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987; 106: 89-93
44. Ono K, Yonenobu K, Miyamoto S, Pathology of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 359: 18-26
45. Trojan DA, Pouchot J, Pokrupa R, Diagnosis and treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine: report of eight cases and literature review. Am J Med 1992; 92: 296-306