Measurement of long-term outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically

European Spine Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2552-2557

  Al Tamimi, Y Z ^a,b   Guilfoyle, M ^a   Seeley, H ^a   Laing, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical myelopathy; Disability outcome; Short Form 36; Visual analogue score

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAND PAIN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT FORM 36; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPLICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPONDYLOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84890562257     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2965-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. King JT Jr, Moossy JJ, Tsevat J, Roberts MS (2005) Multimodal assessment after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2(5):526-534
2. Geigle R, Jones SB (1990) Outcomes measurement: a report from the front. Inquiry 27(1):7-13
3. Jankowitz BT, Gerszten PC (2006) Decompression for cervical myelopathy. Spine J 6(6 Suppl):317S-322S
4. Latimer M, Haden N, Seeley HM, Laing RJ (2002) Measurement of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically. Br J Neurosurg 16(6):545-549
5. Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM (1995) Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 82(5):745-751
6. Casey AT, Bland JM, Crockard HA (1996) Development of a functional scoring system for rheumatoid arthritis patients with cervical myelopathy. Ann Rheum Dis 55(12):901-906
7. Singh A, Crockard HA (2001) Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. J Outcome Meas 5(1):798-818
8. King JT Jr, McGinnis KA, Roberts MS (2003) Quality of life assessment with the medical outcomes study Short Form-36 among patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg 52(1):113-120 (discussion 121)
9. King JT Jr, Roberts MS (2002) Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 97(2 Suppl):180-185
10. King JT Jr, Tsevat J, Moossy JJ, Roberts MS (2004) Preference-based quality of life measurement in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(11):1271-1280
11. Rajshekhar V, Muliyil J (2007) Patient perceived outcome after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 68(2):185-190 (discussion 190-181)
12. Stoffman MR, Roberts MS, King JT Jr (2005) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy, depression, and anxiety: a cohort analysis of 89 patients. Neurosurg 57(2):307-313 (discussion 307-313)
13. Thakar S, Christopher S, Rajshekhar V (2009) Quality of life assessment after central corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparative evaluation of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief. J Neurosurg Spine 11(4):402-412
14. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361-370