Cost-effectiveness of cell saver in short-segment lumbar laminectomy and fusion (≤3 Levels)

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 17, 2015, Pages E978-E985

  Kelly, Patrick D ^a   Parker, Scott L ^b   Mendenhall, Stephen K ^a   Bible, Jesse E ^b   Sivasubramaniam, Priya ^a   Shau, David N ^a   Mcgirt, Matthew J ^c   Devin, Clinton J ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c CAROLINA NEUROSURGERY AND SPINE ASSOCIATES   (United States)

Author keywords

blood loss; cell salvage; cell saver; cost effectiveness; lumbar spine; spine surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY MASS; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; COMORBIDITY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LAMINECTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT HISTORY OF SURGERY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT SEGMENT LUMBAR LAMINECTOMY; SMOKING; SPINE FUSION; VERY ELDERLY; BLOOD AUTOTRANSFUSION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; BLOOD TRANSFUSION, AUTOLOGOUS; COHORT STUDIES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940984710     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000955     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine 2005; 30: 1441-5; discussion 6-7
2. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003. Spine 2006; 31: 2707-14
3. Pannell WC, Savin DD, Scott TP, Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States. Spine J 2015; 15: 1719-27.[Epub ahead of print
4. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1295-304
5. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2010; 35: 1329-38
6. Nuttall GA, Horlocker TT, Santrach PJ, Predictors of blood transfusions in spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery. Spine 2000; 25: 596-601
7. Johnson RG, Murphy M, Miller M,. Fusions and transfusions. An analysis of blood loss and autologous replacement during lumbar fusions. Spine 1989; 14: 358-62
8. Waters JH, Dyga RM, Waters JF, The volume of returned red blood cells in a large blood salvage program: Where does it all go? Transfusion 2011; 51: 2126-32
9. Ashworth A, Klein AA,. Cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 401-16
10. Weltert L, Nardella S, Rondinelli MB, Reduction of allogeneic red blood cell usage during cardiac surgery by an integrated intra- and postoperative blood salvage strategy: Results of a randomized comparison. Transfusion 2013; 53: 790-7
11. Owens RK 2nd, Crawford CH 3rd, Djurasovic M, Predictive factors for the use of autologous cell saver transfusion in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 2013; 38: E217-22
12. Canan CE, Myers JA, Owens RK, Blood salvage produces higher total blood product costs in single-level lumbar spine surgery. Spine 2013; 38: 703-8
13. Gause PR, Siska PA, Westrick ER, Efficacy of intraoperative cell saver in decreasing postoperative blood transfusions in instrumented posterior lumbar fusion patients. Spine 2008; 33: 571-5
14. Reitman CA, Watters WC 3rd, Sassard WR,. The Cell Saver in adult lumbar fusion surgery: A cost-benefit outcomes study. Spine 2004; 29: 1580-3; discussion 4
15. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Aebi M, Research and evidence about blood sparing in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 (Suppl 1): S1-2
16. Chanda A, Smith DR, Nanda A,. Autotransfusion by cell saver technique in surgery of lumbar and thoracic spinal fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 298-303
17. Davies L, Brown TJ, Haynes S, Cost-effectiveness of cell salvage and alternative methods of minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion: A systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England) 2006; 10: iii-iv, ix-x, 1-210
18. Esper SA, Waters JH,. Intra-operative cell salvage: a fresh look at the indications and contraindications. Blood Transfus 2011; 9: 139-47
19. Mathai KM, Kang JD, Donaldson WF, Prediction of blood loss during surgery on the lumbar spine with the patient supported prone on the Jackson table. Spine J 2012; 12: 1103-10
20. Tape T,. Interpreting diagnostic tests: The area under a ROC curve]., 2006. Available at: http://gim.unmc.edu/dxtests/ROC3.htm. Accessed 1/20/15, 2015
21. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R,. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2013