Responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire and neck disability index in postoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 17, 2015, Pages 1315-1321

  Chien, Andy ^a   Lai, Dar Ming ^c   Cheng, Chih Hsiu ^d   Wang, Shwu Fen ^b   Hsu, Wei Li ^b   Wang, Jaw Lin ^b  

^a CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

cervical spondylotic myelopathy; JOACMEQ; NDI; outcome measures; responsiveness

Indexed keywords

11 POINT GLOBAL RATING OF CHANGE SCALE; ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BLADDER FUNCTION; CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; CHINESE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GUYATT RESPONSIVENESS INDEX; HUMAN; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION CERVICAL MYELOPATHY EVALUATION; MALE; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL PATIENT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CERVICAL VERTEBRA; COHORT ANALYSIS; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; NECK; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; COHORT STUDIES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940971611     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG,. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 2013; 19: 409-21
2. Rao RD, Gourab K, David KS,. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1619-40
3. Wilson JR, Fehlings MG, Kalsi-Ryan S, Diagnosis, heritability, and outcome assessment in cervical myelopathy: a consensus statement. Spine 2013; 38: S76-7
4. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14: 348-65
5. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 1. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 227-40
6. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: the Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 526-32
7. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: part 3. Determination of reliability. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 321-6
8. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 25-31
9. Nikaido T, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, Surgical treatment assessment using the Japanese Orthopedic Association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire in patients with cervical myelopathy: a new outcome measure for cervical myelopathy. Spine 2009; 34: 2568-72
10. Wu JC, Ko CC, Yen YS, Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35: E10
11. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D,. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32
12. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X,. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 323-35
13. Chien A, Lai DM, Cheng CH, Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire. Spine 2014; 39: 963-70
14. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G,. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171-8
15. Kim HJ, Tetreault LA, Massicotte EM, Differential diagnosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: literature review. Spine 2013; 38: S78-88
16. Wu S, Ma C, Mai M, Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale. Spine 2010; 35: 1575-9
17. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM,. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005; 30: 1331-4
18. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM,. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 69-74
19. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2006; 31: 2541-9
20. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G,. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17: 163-70
21. Preston CC, Colman AM,. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol 2000; 104: 1-15
22. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 459-68
23. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL,. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 1109-23
24. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R,. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties. ? J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 1341-5
25. Azimi P, Rezaei O, Montazeri A,. An outcome measure of functionality and quality of life in patients with cervical myelopathy. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16: e8102