Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of a chinese version of the japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 963-970

  Chien, Andy ^a,b   Lai, Dar Ming ^c   Cheng, Chih Hsiu ^d   Wang, Shwu Fen ^b   Hsu, Wei Li ^b   Wang, Jaw Lin ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

cervical myelopathy outcome; cross cultural adaptation; grading scale; JOACMEQ; mJOA

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARM; ARTICLE; BLADDER FUNCTION; CERVICAL SPINE; CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY; CHINESE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION CERVICAL MYELOPATHY EVALUATION; JAPANESE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATION CERVICAL MYELOPATHY EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE CHINESE VERSION; LANGUAGE; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NECK PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CHINA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PILOT STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPONDYLOSIS; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE); UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CHINA; CULTURE; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION; SPONDYLOSIS; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TRANSLATING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84901399317     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000313     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kailaya-Vasan A, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011; 14: 348-55.
2. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscien-tist 2013; 19: 409-21.
3. Yarbrough CK, Murphy RK, Ray WZ, et al. The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Adv Orthop 2012; 2012: 480643.
4. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, et al. Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 1013-6.
5. Vitzthum HE, Dalitz K. Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2007; 16: 2096-103.
6. King JT Jr, Roberts MS. Validity and reliability of the Short Form-36 in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 180-5.
7. Wilson JR, Fehlings MG, Kalsi-Ryan S, et al. Diagnosis, heritability, and outcome assessment in cervical myelopathy: a consensus statement. Spine 2013; 38: S76-7.
8. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. April 16, 2007. The Subcommittee of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 2009; 14: 348-65.
9. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 1. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 227-40.
10. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability: The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 526-32.
11. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: part 3. Determination of reliability. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 321-6.
12. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 25-31.
13. Nikaido T, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, et al. Surgical treatment assessment using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire in patients with cervical myelopathy: a new outcome measure for cervical myelopathy. Spine 2009; 34: 2568-72.
14. Wu JC, Ko CC, Yen YS, et al. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus 2013; 35: E10.
15. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32.
16. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 323-35.
17. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-91.
18. Kim HJ, Tetreault LA, Massicotte EM, et al. Differential diagnosis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: literature review. Spine 2013; 38: S78-88.
19. Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. J Consum Res 1994; 21: 381-91.
20. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226-32.
21. Singh A, Crockard HA. Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and postoperative improvement. J Outcome Meas 2001; 5: 798-818.
22. Wu S, Ma C, Mai M, et al. Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine 2010; 35: 1575-9.
23. Ackelman BH, Lindgren U. Validity and reliability of a modified version of the Neck Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 284-7.
24. Hoving JL, O'Leary EF, Niere KR, et al. Validity of the Neck Disability Index, Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 2003; 102: 273-81.
25. En MC, Clair DA, Edmondston SJ. Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. Man Ther 2009; 14: 433-8.
26. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Cote P, et al. Use of outcome measures in managing neck pain: an international multidisciplinary survey. Open Orthop J 2013; 7: 506-20.
27. Kalsi-Ryan S, Singh A, Massicotte EM, et al. Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 2013; 38: S111-22.
28. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B, et al. Anterior vs posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine 2013; 38: 2247-52.
29. Ding C, Hong Y, Liu H, et al. Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79: 338-46.
30. Liu Y, Qi M, Chen H, et al. Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 2428-35.
31. Ailliet L, Knol DL, Rubinstein SM, et al. Definition of the con struct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of valid ity. The Neck Disability Index as an example. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66: 775-82; quiz 82.e1-2.
32. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, et al. Prediction of lower limb functional recovery after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: focusing on the 10-s step test. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 1389-95.
33. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, et al. Validity of the 10-s step test: prospective study comparing it with the 10-s grip and release test and the 30-m walking test. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 1318-22.
34. Lebl DR, Hughes A, Cammisa FP Jr, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. HSS J 2011; 7: 170-8.
35. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. "Ten second step test" as a new quantifiable parameter of cervical myelopathy. Spine 2009; 34: 82-6.
36. Holly L T, Matz PG, Anderson P A, et al. Functional outcomes assessment for cervical degenerative disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 238-44.