Measurement of opening and closing angles of aortic valve prostheses in vivo using dual-source computed tomography: Comparison with those of manufacturers’ in 10 different types

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1012-1023

  Suh, Young Joo ^a   Kim, Young Jin ^a   Hong, Yoo Jin ^a   Lee, Hye Jeong ^a   Hur, Jin ^a   Im, Dong Jin ^a   Kim, Yun Jung ^a   Choi, Byoung Wook ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Dual source computed tomography; Measurement; Mechanical aortic valve; Opening and closing angles

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CLOSING ANGLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DUAL SOURCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INCREASED PRESSURE GRADIENT; LIMITATION OF MOTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPENING ANGLE; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; TRICUSPID VALVE DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84940926291     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1012     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bach DS. Echo/Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement: principles of interrogation and evaluation of high gradients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:296-304
2. Carrier M, Pellerin M, Basmadjian A, Bouchard D, Perrault LP, Cartier R, et al. Fifteen years of clinical and echocardiographic follow up with the carbomedics heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:67-72
3. LaBounty TM, Agarwal PP, Chughtai A, Bach DS, Wizauer E, Kazerooni EA. Evaluation of mechanical heart valve size and function with ECG-gated 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W389-W396
4. Konen E, Goitein O, Feinberg MS, Eshet Y, Raanani E, Rimon U, et al. The role of ECG-gated MDCT in the evaluation of aortic and mitral mechanical valves: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:26-31
5. Lee DH, Youn HJ, Shim SB, Lee SH, Jung JI, Jung SE, et al. The measurement of opening angle and orifice area of a bileaflet mechanical valve using multidetector computed tomography. Korean Circ J 2009;39:157-162
6. Suchá D, Symersky P, Vonken EJ, Provoost E, Chamuleau SA, Budde RP. Multidetector-row computed tomography allows accurate measurement of mechanical prosthetic heart valve leaflet closing angles compared with fluoroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014;38:451-456
7. Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y, Fu YC, Wang CC, Hsieh SR, et al. Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 2009;19:857-867
8. Teshima H, Hayashida N, Fukunaga S, Tayama E, Kawara T, Aoyagi S, et al. Usefulness of a multidetector-row computed tomography scanner for detecting pannus formation. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:523-526
9. Ueda T, Teshima H, Fukunaga S, Aoyagi S, Tanaka H. Evaluation of prosthetic valve obstruction on electrocardiographically gated multidetector-row computed tomography--identification of subprosthetic pannus in the aortic position. Circ J 2013;77:418-423
10. Park YJ, Kim YJ, Lee JW, Kim HY, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, et al. Automatic Tube Potential Selection with Tube Current Modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:184-190
11. Suh YJ, Kim YJ, Hong SR, Hong YJ, Lee HJ, Hur J, et al. Combined use of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction technique in coronary CT angiography. Radiology 2013;269:722-729
12. Symersky P, Budde RP, de Mol BA, Prokop M. Comparison of multidetector-row computed tomography to echocardiography and fluoroscopy for evaluation of patients with mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1128-1134
13. Aoyagi S, Arinaga K, Fukunaga S, Tayama E, Kosuga T, Akashi H. Leaflet movement of the ATS valve in the aortic position: unique behavior observed in 19-mm valves. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:853-857
14. Feng Z, Nakamura T, Fujimoto T, Umezu M. In vitro investigation of opening behavior and hydrodynamics of bileaflet valves in the mitral position. Artif Organs 2002;26:32-39
15. Parnell A, Swanevelder J. High transvalvular pressure gradients on intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography after aortic valve replacement: what does it mean? HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth 2009;1:7-18
16. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, Foster E, Gottdiener JS, Grayburn PA, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:975-1014
17. Tayama E, Feng Z, Oda T, Tomoeda H, Hayashida N, Fukunaga S, et al. ATS prosthetic valve motion: an in vitro analysis. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:408-414
18. Habets J, Mali WP, Budde RP. Multidetector CT angiography in evaluation of prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Radiographics 2012;32:1893-1905
19. Habets J, Budde RP, Symersky P, van den Brink RB, de Mol BA, Mali WP, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Nat Rev Cardiol 2011;8:466-478
20. Montorsi P, Arena V, Muratori M, Lavarra F, Cavoretto D, Repossini A, et al. Fluoroscopic functional evaluation of bileaflet prostheses: effect of different intraoperative valve orientation. Am J Card Imaging 1996;10:101-107
21. Cianciulli TE, Lax JA, Beck MA, Cerruti FE, Gigena GE, Saccheri MC, et al. Cinefluoroscopic assessment of mechanical disc prostheses: its value as a complementary method to echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:664-673
22. Cianciulli TF, Saccheri MC, Lax JA, Guidoin R, Zhang Z, Guerra JE, et al. Intermittent acute aortic regurgitation of a mechanical bileaflet aortic valve prosthesis: diagnosis and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:446-449
23. Kuniyoshi Y, Koja K, Miyagi K, Shimoji M, Uezu T, Arakaki K, et al. Pannus formation in aortic valve prostheses in the late postoperative period. J Artif Organs 2003;6:179-182
24. Teshima H, Hayashida N, Yano H, Nishimi M, Tayama E, Fukunaga S, et al. Obstruction of St Jude Medical valves in the aortic position: histology and immunohistochemistry of pannus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:401-407