The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in black samples

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2016, Pages e23-e30

  Davis, Don E ^a   Rice, Kenneth ^a   Van Tongeren, Daryl R ^b   Hook, Joshua N ^c   DeBlaere, Cirleen ^a   Worthington, Everett L ^d   Choe, Elise ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HOPE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Invariance; Measurement; Moral foundation theory; Politics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; CAUCASIAN; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MORALITY; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RELIGION; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MORALS; POLITICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940915991     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000056     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bontempo, D. E., & Hofer, S. M. (2007). Assessing factorial invariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Oxford handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 153-175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Boyd-Franklin, N. (2010). Incorporating spirituality and religion into the treatment of African American clients. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 976-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011000010374881
3. Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005-1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013193
4. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
5. Davies, C. L., Sibley, C. G., & Liu, J. H. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Social Psychology, 38, 1-6.
6. Dimock, M. D., Doherty, C., Kiley, J., & Vidya, K. (2014). Beyond red v. blue: The political typology. Fragmented center poses election challenges for both parties. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-26-14-Political-Typology-release1.pdf
7. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Glass, J., & Nath, L. E. (2006). Religious conservatism and women's market behavior following marriage and childbirth. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 611-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00278.x
9. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309353415
10. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
11. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
12. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
13. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon/Random House.
14. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573
15. Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don't we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352179
16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17. Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7, e42366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042366
18. Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 219-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274
19. Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring model fit. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm
20. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. New York, NY: Rand McNally.
21. Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.006
22. Mattis, J. S., & Grayman-Simpson, N. (2013). Faith and the sacred in African American life. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality: Vol. 2 (pp. 547-564). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/14045-030
23. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
24. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
25. Worthington, E. L., Jr., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., Mc-Cullough, M. E., Berry, J. W.,... O'Connor, L. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 84-96.