Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre reinforced composite laminates

Failure Criteria in Fibre-Reinforced-Polymer Composites

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 30-51

  Soden, P D ^a   Hinton, M J ^b   Kaddour, A S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b QINETIQ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELASTIC CONSTANTS; INPUT OUTPUT PROGRAMS; LAMINATED COMPOSITES; LAMINATES; SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS; STRESS ANALYSIS; STRESS-STRAIN CURVES;

COMPOSITE LAMINATE; FIBRE REINFORCED COMPOSITES; LINEAR ELASTIC ANALYSIS; LOADING CONDITION; LOADING DIRECTION; NON-LINEAR STRESS-STRAIN; STACKING SEQUENCE; STRESS-STRAIN BEHAVIORS;

LOADING;

EID: 84940865861     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50003-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. M J Hinton, A S Kaddour and P D Soden, 'The World-Wide Failure Exercise: Its Origin, Concept And Content', see Chapter 1 in this book.
2. Gotsis PK, Chamis CC, Minnetyan L Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fracture. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1137-1150. see also Chapter 3.1 in this book.
3. Eckold GC Failure criteria for use in the design environment. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1095-1106. see also Chapter 3.2 in this book.
4. Edge EC Stress based Grant-Sanders method for predicting failure of composite laminates. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1043-1044. see also Chapter 3.3 in this book.
5. McCartney LN Predicting transverse crack formation in cross-ply laminate. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1069-1082. see also Chapter 3.4 in this book.
6. Hart-Smith LJ Predictions of the original and truncated maximum strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1151-1178. see also Chapter 3.5 in this book.
7. Hart-Smith LJ Predictions of a generalised maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1179-1208. see also Chapter 3.6 in this book.
8. Puck A, Schürmann H Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1045-1068. see also Chapter 3.7 in this book.
9. Rotem A Prediction of laminate failure with Rotem failure criterion. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1083-1094. see also Chapter 3.8 in this book.
10. Sun CT, Tao JX Prediction of failure envelopes and stress strain behaviours of composite laminates. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1125-1136. see also Chapter 3.9 in this book.
11. Liu K-S, Tsai SW A progressive quadratic failure criterion of a laminate. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1023-1032. see also Chapter 3.10 in this book.
12. Wolfe WE, Butalia TS A strain energy based failure criterion for nonlinear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1107-1124. see also Chapter 3.11 in this book.
13. Zinoviev P, Grigoriev SV, Labedeva OV, Tairova LR Strength of multilayered composites under plane stress state. Compos Sci Techno 1998, V58:1209-1224. see also Chapter 3.13 in this book.
14. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ, Soden PD A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: Additional contributions. Compos Sci Techno 2004, V64:449-476. 2002, see also the up-date Chapter 4 in this book.
15. Tsai SW Composite design 1988, Think Composites, Dayton, Ohio. 4th edition.
16. Daniel IM, Yaniv G, Auser JW Rate effects on delamination fracture toughness of graphite/epoxy composites. 4th Int Conf Composite Structures 1987, V2:2.258-2.272. Paisely College of Technology, Scotland, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London. I.M. Marshall (Ed.).
17. Daniel IM, Ishai O Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
18. Tarnopol'skii YM, Kincis TY Static test methods for composites. Handbook of Composites, V3, Failure Mechanics of Composites 1985, 215-275. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. G.C. Sih, A.M. Skudra (Eds.).
19. Swanson SR, Messick MJ, Toombes GR Comparison of torsion tube and Iosipescu in-plane shear test results for a carbon fibre reinforced epxy composite. Composites 1985, V16:220-224.
20. Swanson SR, Toombes GR Characterisation of prepreg tow carbon/epoxy laminates. J Engg Mater Techno, Trans ASME 1989, V111:150-153.
21. Kim RY, Castro AS Failure of carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composites under combined loading. Proc. ICCM-9 1993, Vol V:15-22. University of Zaragona, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Spain. A. Miravete (Ed.).
22. Sun CT, Jun AW Compressive strength of unidirectional fibre composites with matrix nonlinearity. Compos Sci Techno 1994, V52:577-587.
23. P D Soden, M J Hinton and A S Kaddour, 'Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates', see Chapter 2.2 in this book.
24. Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR, Harik VM, Newill JF, Burns BP Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates. Compos Sci Techno 2004, V64:329-342. 2002, see also Chapter 3.15 in this book.
25. Cuntze RG, Freund A The predictive capability of failure mode concept- based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates. Compos Sci Techno 2004, V64:343-377. 2002, see also Chapter 3.14 in this book.
26. Mayes S, Hansen AC Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum theory. Compos Sci Techno 2004, V64:379-394. 2002, see also Chapter 3.15 in this book.
27. Huang Z-m A bridging model prediction of the tensile strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads. Compos Sci Techno 2004, V64:395-448. 2002, see also Chapter 3.16 in this book.
28. Hart-Smith LJ Expanding the capabilities of the ten-percent rule for predicting the strength of fibre-polymer composites. Compos Sci Techno 2002, V62:1515-1544. see also Chapter 3.17 in this book.