Chronaxie measurements in patterned neuronal cultures from rat hippocampus

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Stern, Shani ^a   Agudelo Toro, Andres ^b   Rotem, Assaf ^c   Moses, Elisha ^a   Neef, Andreas ^b  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DYNAMICS AND SELF ORGANIZATION   (Germany)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHRONAXY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITE; ELECTRIC FIELD; EMBRYO; HIPPOCAMPUS; NERVE CELL CULTURE; NERVE CELL GROWTH; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; RAT; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; AXON; DRUG EFFECTS; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIMARY CELL CULTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WISTAR RAT;

2 AMINO 5 PHOSPHONOVALERIC ACID; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; 6 CYANO 7 NITRO 2,3 QUINOXALINEDIONE; AMINO ACID RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; AMPA RECEPTOR; BICUCULLINE; BICUCULLINE METHOCHLORIDE; CALCIUM; FAMPRIDINE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR; POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT;

2-AMINO-5-PHOSPHONOVALERATE; 4-AMINOPYRIDINE; 6-CYANO-7-NITROQUINOXALINE-2,3-DIONE; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AXONS; BICUCULLINE; CALCIUM; CHRONAXY; DENDRITES; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EXCITATORY AMINO ACID ANTAGONISTS; GABA ANTAGONISTS; HIPPOCAMPUS; POTASSIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; PRIMARY CELL CULTURE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; RECEPTORS, AMPA; RECEPTORS, GABA; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE;

EID: 84940841412     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132577     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Flöel A, Rösser N, Michka O, Knecht S, Breitenstein C. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Language Learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2008; 20(8): 1415-22. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008. 20098 PMID: 18303984
2. Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Experimental Brain Research. 2005; 166(1): 23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6 PMID: 15999258
3. Hallett M. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Primer. Neuron. 2007; 55(2): 187-99. doi: 10.1016/j. neuron.2007.06.026 PMID: 17640522
4. Kincses TZ, Antal A, Nitsche MA, Bártfai O, Paulus W. Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(1): 113-7. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00124-6 PMID: 14615081
5. Pashut T, Wolfus S, Friedman A, Lavidor M, Bar-Gad I, Yeshurun Y, et al. Mechanisms of Magnetic Stimulation of Central Nervous System Neurons. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(3). doi: 10.1371/journal. pcbi.1002022
6. Radman T, Datta A, Ramos RL, Brumberg JC, Bikson M. One-dimensional representation of a neuron in a uniform electric field. 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. Minneapolis, MN; 2009
7. Rahman A, Reato D, Arlotti M, Gasca F, Datta A, Parra LC, et al. Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. The Journal of Physiology. 2013; 591(10): 2563-78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171
8. Wagner T, Rushmore J, Eden U, Valero-Cabre A. Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: Setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences. Cortex. 2009; 45(9): 1025-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.002 PMID: 19027896
9. Gustafsson B, Jankowska E. Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly. The Journal of Physiology. 1976; 258(1): 33-61. PMID: 940071
10. Nowak LG, Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 118(4): 477-88. PMID: 9504843
11. Rattay F. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience. 1999; 89(2): 335-46. PMID: 10077317
12. Braitenberg V, Schüz A. Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1998. 249 p.
13. Golding NL, Staff NP, Spruston N. Dendritic spikes as a mechanism for cooperative long-term potentiation. Nature. 2002; 418(6895): 326-31. doi: 10.1038/nature00854 PMID: 12124625
14. Gasparini S, Migliore M, Magee JC. On the Initiation and Propagation of Dendritic Spikes in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2004; 24(49): 11046-56. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2520- 04.2004 PMID: 15590921
15. Golding NL, Jung H-Y, Mickus T, Spruston N. Dendritic Calcium Spike Initiation and Repolarization Are Controlled by Distinct Potassium Channel Subtypes in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1999; 19(20): 8789-98. PMID: 10516298
16. Golding NL, Spruston N. Dendritic Sodium Spikes Are Variable Triggers of Axonal Action Potentials in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons. Neuron. 1998; 21(5): 1189-200. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00) 80635-2 PMID: 9856473
17. Kamondi A, Acsády L, Buzsáki G. Dendritic Spikes Are Enhanced by Cooperative Network Activity in the Intact Hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1998; 18(10): 3919-28. PMID: 9570819
18. Kim S, Guzman SJ, Hu H, Jonas P. Active dendrites support efficient initiation of dendritic spikes in hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Nature neuroscience. 2012; 15(4): 600-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.3060 PMID: 22388958
19. Ranck JB. Which Elements Are Excited in Electrical-Stimulation of Mammalian Central Nervous-System- Review. Brain Research. 1975; 98(3): 417-40. ISI:A1975AV77900001 PMID: 1102064
20. Brunel N, van Rossum MCW. Quantitative investigations of electrical nerve excitation treated as polarization. Biol Cybern. 2007; 97(5-6): 341-9. doi: 10.1007/s00422-007-0189-6 PMID: 18046573
21. Lapicque L. Recherches quantitatives sur l'excitation electrique des nerfs traitee comme une polarization. J Physiol Pathol Gen. 1907; 9: 620-35.
22. Weiss G. Sur la possibilité de rendre comparable entre eux les appareils servant à l'excitation électrique. Arch Ital Biol. 1901; 35: 413-46.
23. Plonsey R, Barr RC. Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2007.
24. Cartee LA, Plonsey R. The transient subthreshold response of spherical and cylindrical cell models to extracellular stimulation. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 1992; 39(1): 76-85. doi:10. 1109/10.108130 PMID: 1572684
25. Rattay F. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1986; 33(10): 974-7. PMID: 3770787
26. Nowak LG, Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 118(4): 489-500. Epub 1998/03/21. PMID: 9504844
27. Boinagrov D, Loudin J, Palanker D. Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010; 104(4): 2236-48. doi: 10.1152/jn. 00343.2010 PMID: 20702740
28. Rattay F, Paredes LP, Leao RN. Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes. Neuroscience. 2012; 214: 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004 PMID: 22516015
29. Rotem A, Moses E. Magnetic stimulation of one-dimensional neuronal cultures. Biophysical Journal. 2008; 94(12): 5065-78. ISI:000256231700047 doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125708 PMID: 18326634
30. Feinerman O, Rotem A, Moses E. Reliable neuronal logic devices from patterned hippocampal cultures. nature physics. 2008; 4(12): 967-73. ISI:000261386000021
31. Nagarajan SS, Durand DM, Warman EN. Effects of induced electric fields on finite neuronal structures: a simulation study. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 1993; 40(11): 1175-88. doi:10. 1109/10.245636 PMID: 8307602
32. Roth BJ, Basser PJ. A model of the stimulation of a nerve fiber by electromagnetic induction. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 1990; 37(6): 588-97. doi: 10.1109/10.55662 PMID: 2354840
33. Hoffman DA, Magee JC, Colbert CM, Johnston D. K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons (vol 387, pg 860, 1997). Nature. 1997; 390(6656): 199-. ISI: A1997YF49400061
34. Bordey A, Sontheimer H. Differential inhibition of glial K+ currents by 4-AP. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1999; 82(6): 3476-87. PMID: 10601476
35. Feinerman O, Segal M, Moses E. Signal propagation along unidimensional neuronal networks. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(5): 3406-16. Epub 2005/07/29. 00264.2005 [pii]. PMID: 16049148
36. Reilly JP. Peripheral-Nerve Stimulation by Induced Electric Currents-Exposure to Time-Varying Magnetic- Fields. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 1989; 27(2): 101-10. ISI: A1989T892400001
37. McNeal DR. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 1976; 23(4): 329-37. Epub 1976/07/01. PMID: 1278925
38. Downes JH, Hammond MW, Xydas D, Spencer MC, Becerra VM, Warwick K, et al. Emergence of a small-world functional network in cultured neurons. PLOS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(5): e1002522. Epub 2012/05/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002522 PMID: 22615555; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3355061
39. Hill AV. Excitation and Accomodation in Nerve. Proceedings Of The Royal Society. 1936; 119: 305-55.
40. Hines ML, Carnevale NT. The NEURON Simulation Environment. Neural Computation. 1997; 9(6): 1179-209. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1179 PMID: 9248061
41. Hsu KH, Durand DM. Prediction of neural excitation during magnetic stimulation using passive cable models. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 2000; 47(4): 463-71. doi: 10.1109/10.828146 PMID: 10763292
42. Breskin I, Soriano J, Moses E, Tlusty T. Percolation in living neural networks. Physical Review Letters. 2006; 97(18).
43. Soriano J, Rodriguez Martinez M, Tlusty T, Moses E. Development of input connections in neural cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(37): 13758-63. Epub 2008/09/06. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0707492105 PMID: 18772389; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2544527
44. Iles JF. Simple models of stimulation of neurones in the brain by electric fields. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005; 87(1): 17-31. Epub 2004/10/09. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.06.002 PMID: 15471588
45. Fox PT, Narayana S, Tandon N, Sandoval H, Fox SP, Kochunov P, et al. Column-based model of electric field excitation of cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004; 22(1): 1-14. Epub 2004/04/15. doi:10. 1002/hbm.20006 PMID: 15083522
46. Harnett MT, Makara JK, Spruston N, Kath WL, Magee JC. Synaptic amplification by dendritic spines enhances input cooperativity. Nature. 2012; 491(7425): 599-602. Epub 2012/10/30. doi: 10.1038/ nature11554 PMID: 23103868; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3504647
47. Vetter P, Roth A, Hausser M. Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(2): 926-37. Epub 2001/02/13. PMID: 11160523
48. West DC, Wolstencroft JH. Strength-duration characteristics of myelinated and non-myelinated bulbospinal axons in the cat spinal cord. J Physiol. 1983; 337: 37-50. Epub 1983/04/01. PMID: 6875936; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1199093
49. Shinoda Y, Zarzecki P, Asanuma H. Spinal branching of pyramidal tract neurons in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1979; 34(1): 59-72. Epub 1979/01/02. PMID: 103741
50. Warman EN, Grill WM, Durand D. Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: determination of excitation thresholds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992; 39(12): 1244-54. Epub 1992/12/01. PMID: 1487287
51. Higgs MH, Spain WJ. Kv1 channels control spike threshold dynamics and spike timing in cortical pyramidal neurones. The Journal of Physiology. 2011; 589(Pt 21): 5125-42. Epub 2011/09/14. doi:10. 1113/jphysiol.2011.216721 PMID: 21911608; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3225669
52. Peng Y-RR, He S, Marie H, Zeng S-YY, Ma J, Tan Z-JJ, et al. Coordinated changes in dendritic arborization and synaptic strength during neural circuit development. Neuron. 2009; 61(1): 71-84. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuron.2008.11.015 PMID: 19146814